علوم شناختی

 The current research was conducted with the aim of developing a creativity management model based on cognitive sciences and technologies in military universities. For this purpose, by using the capacity of the qualitative research approach and the focus group method, the dimensions and components of the studied model were identified. The data was collected using the purposeful sampling method of the criterion type and focus interview with 4 focus groups from among 12 experts in the field of cognitive science and analyzed using thematic analysis method.Structural capital includes components such as educational space, office space, welfare space, facilities and equipment, educational systems, software, network and internet equipment. Cultural capital includes components such as knowledge and expertise, organizational culture, educational and research resources, interactive space and social networks. Political capital includes components such as power and influence, leadership and management, networking and accountability. Cognitive capital includes components such as problem solving, learning, adaptability, knowledge production, trust, cohesion, interactions, participation and cooperation, organizational belonging, and reputation. The model presented in this research provides a comprehensive framework for creativity management in military universities. This model, taking into account different dimensions of capital (structural, cultural, political and cognitive), can help to improve the level of creativity in these universities. This research shows that cognitive technologies have the capacity to become a powerful tool for developing creativity in organizations. By supporting knowledge sharing, enhancing communication and facilitating collaboration in these four dimensions, cognitive technologies can empower individuals and organizations to achieve greater innovation.

Today, cognitive sciences and technologies are known as one of the most advanced fields of science and technology, and due to the great influence of this field on various social, political, economic, military, etc. aspects, significant costs are spent on these researches. to be The purpose of this article is to examine the various capabilities of cognitive sciences and technologies in the field of defense and security. This research is qualitative and the focus group method was used to collect data. In this method, the opinions of experts related to the subject have been collected and analyzed. The findings of this research show that cognitive sciences and technologies can be used in various fields of defense and security, such as strengthening the mind by creating cognitive flexibility, training and developing super soldiers to increase human performance, designing and producing weapons. cognitive to deal with the threats of cognitive warfare, fusion of man and machine, etc. Using the capabilities of science and cognitive technologies in the field of defense and security can achieve extensive achievements in the field of improving the detection and prevention of security threats, managing risks related to defense and security, and making it possible to collect, analyze and use a huge amount of data in the form of fast and smart, and not paying attention to these capabilities can have serious and unpleasant consequences. However, cognitive sciences and technologies have many capabilities to improve the defense and security capabilities of countries, and the use of these capabilities can help increase security and stability in the world.

Threats and hybrid wars are among the concepts that have become frequent in the new era. In order to achieve their strategic goals, actors of hybrid threats use a wide range of methods from cyber attacks, political propaganda, strengthening discontent and community building, political orientation, subversion, sabotage, economic blackmail, recruitment, networking, etc. in order to realize their plans. They are especially used in the field of armed forces. In response to mixed and dynamic threats, the aim of this research is to provide a model of alertness and intelligence of Faraja employees against threats.

The research method is mixed and applied. In the qualitative stage, by analyzing the content of articles and documents through MAXQDA software, the themes of alertness and intelligence of employees are identified, in the next stage, the reliability of the researcher-made questionnaire is calculated based on the content analysis, and in the final stage, the questionnaire is distributed and then From factor loading calculation and Friedman's test, the result has been evaluated with the CMMI maturity model.

The results of the qualitative phase were identified in the three main groups of emotional intelligence, intelligence quotient and emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence. In the quantitative phase, the reliability coefficient was 92%, and in the descriptive statistics phase, the maturity level of the calculated indicators was determined in the interaction of humans with technology for alertness and intelligence (with 40.3%), organizational cognitive sciences in alertness and intelligence (with 48.5%), Individual cognitive sciences in alertness and intelligence (with 48.2%) and are in the second level of the CMMI maturity model, i.e. the organized level.

Public participation as an indicator of political development has become increasingly important for governments. At the same time, indifference to political participation has challenged governments. By recognizing the social, the politicians want to motivate them to participate in the political process, so that the society can continue its democratic movement and the party or the political current to which they belong will win the elections. The question is whether an argumentative model can be used. Recognize individuals in political decision-making? In this study, researchers have identified the factors affecting the political reasoning model of voters by theoretically examining the application of cognitive sciences in political marketing, using the Delphi method with in-depth interviews with 28 experts in cognitive sciences, political science, and marketing science. And explain. Research Findings and Suggestions: Researchers have finally developed a model of political decision-making and based on their findings to governments, politicians, and political parties and suggest that this model be used to understand the method of reasoning of individuals and in political propaganda this Model to use.

Since the beginning of history, wars and strategic conflicts have had a cognitive dimension. In today's world, the increasing importance of paying attention to the cognitive war (managing the flow of information and its reading by the audience) as an endless battle, has been caused by the rapid growth of its territory in recent years. Cognitive warfare as a new concept is the product of a comprehensive and gestalt look at wars that are reproduced as warfare, information warfare, cyber warfare, electronic warfare, surveillance and reconnaissance war, and is implemented in a hybrid and multi-layered manner by targeting the attitudes and behaviors of the target society. It is based on perception management. In this research, the basic question is, what are the effects of cognitive warfare on the governance of countries and destabilizing the public institutions of the government? This research focuses on placing Russia as a case study as a research model by focusing on common concepts and procedures in the field of cognitive warfare, conceptual, structural and operational dimensions (principles, methods, tools and processes of action) with a descriptive approach. To study an analysis based on documentary-library data. The research method is qualitative.

The rapid development of communication technologies has led to the formation of a type of diplomacy in the form of media diplomacy, in the framework of which the media, as a tool of political propaganda of governments, plans the minds of the audience and the public to accept. Government policies are prepared. Therefore, familiarity with media methods of mind planning in the context of media theories is important. The present study examines the role of media diplomacy in politics and public opinion using the method of content analysis and media cognitive theories such as implantation and Limited effects Paradigm, and answers the important question of how this is analyzed in the framework of the cognitive approach. How media cognitive theories optimize media diplomacy. Based on the research results, the application of Limited effects Paradigm in value creation and orientation of public opinion in the context of temporary media effects, the role of mental implantation in identity formation and attitude change in the context of long-term and sustainable media effects and the application of cognitive-social theory in political education and shaping referred to stable political behaviours.

Discovering the relationship between the two essences of cognition the brain and mind are essential for understanding how humans make decisions. Of course, it is a difficult path related to analytical philosophy and cellular and molecular sciences. This article is trying to create a clear picture of these interdisciplinary relationships to understand better the policy maker's brain and mind in making the public policy agenda. The present study considers Kahenman's distinguishing human brain decisions into intuitive and logical systems. The allocation of 95% share to the intuitive system is a design bias and needs to be redefined and an optimal model based on interdisciplinary studies suggested in this article.  Scientific findings from different studies in the field of cognitive neuroscience confirmed that the decision process is influenced by determinants such as health and cellular efficiency of the decision maker's brain and their consciousness as well as the functionality of neurosensory receptors and their interconnectivity.  The decision can be formed under the influence of distorted external information from the environment or false internal information of the central nervous system and the resulting illusion. Receiving misinformation can be due to sensory receptors defect, brain injuries, pharmaceutical product or drug abuse. On the other hand, old age and brain damage can lead to diminished or heterogeneous brain neurons, dementia, and loss of identity memories. This type of brain tissue abnormality reduces the brain-mind decision-making capacity, causes cognitive biases, reduces the ability to make correct and timely decisions, or leads to abnormal decision-making. The scope of decision-making disorder can go beyond the individual sphere. In terms of the influence on the policymaker, social and national decisions and policies could be affected and as a result, causing misdirection of the ruling system and development in the country and the world. Testing this hypothesis will require conducting experimental cognitive neuroscience research on the target population of policymakers.

Nowadays, strategic using of language in the interpretation of texts and instruments in international law has been examined by the scholars of interdisciplinary studies. Along these lines, we can consider the usefulness of cognitive - pragmatic framing in studying legal interpretation. In cognitive framing, the question is that whether there is any relationship between strategic studies and international law texts. This article while examining this question claims that cognitive framing and strategic use of language have to do with how documents in international law are interpreted. For instance, the term “liberalization” stands for “military intervention” or "border wall" is used instead of "security fence". The strategic use of language shows that states are able to imply positive or negative framings to the minds of their audience and influence the interpretation of international legal texts and instruments.

Given that political marketing has come from the behaviors of reality in political affairs to universities, and has been theorized in the faculties of political science, so existing theories are usually the only ones explaining the facts and usually the deeper and deeper layers of science, the less these theories. Is taken into consideration. Accordingly, and as political market players need a more cognitive and cognitive model for conducting political affairs, in particular, understanding the factors that influence voter behavior, they can both effectively and accurately identify voter behavior. To predict behaviors and ultimately vote to avoid errors in political forecasting and planning, the researcher first criticizes existing political marketing theories and then presents a neural (cognitive) model of political marketing. Based on research by the researcher. The author's point of view in critiquing political marketing patterns is based on the marketing perspective and has been examined on this basis. Finally, the researcher presented the cognitive marketing model (basal nerve) as a functional model based on the function of the nerves and the way the human brain works. The model presented in this study is presented in three levels: Level 1, the level of voters and voters, which focuses more on the internal and psychological issues that have cognitive origins; And there are domestic laws; the third level, the political environment abroad, which includes the international media and international political institutions. The Delphi method was used to design the model. The Delphi panel was comprised of specialists in cognitive and neuroscience, political science, and marketing science. Given that the model should be tested, the researcher used a pls tool to test the model with 384 respondents from over 18 years of Iranian political affairs inside and outside the country using a questionnaire. Other parts of the model in this study have been tested by the Delphi method.

Cognitive science is one of the new knowledge. This discipline consists of subsets of neuroscience, psychology, linguistics, artificial intelligence and philosophy of mind and has been widely used in sub disciplines such as medicine, education, sociology, politics, information science, communication and media, medical engineering, command and control engineering, and even defense and war science. Cognitive enhancement emphasizes drug and non-drug techniques to enhance brain function and ability, and they are somehow aesthetic and empowering cognition While these techniques are essentially ethical or not, and the effects of each one can be applied to the social community, the researchers are in the position of the researchers. In this regard, the role of the government as a policymaker is very much in this area. This paper introduces cognitive science, cognitive enhancement, analyzes of ethical and social issues, and the role of the state as a policy-maker in this knowledge.

Cognitive psychology is a branch of cognitive sciences which studies the internal subjective processes as problem-solving, memory, understanding, cognition, language and decision making through concentration on mind. In fact, cognitive psychology aims to answer the question of what is the impact of human mind on decision making process. Decision making in foreign policy is affected by actors who have their own inputs, psychology, and aims. By taking benefit from new means to study the way of information analysis and give a different understanding of how the decisions are made, the present article aims to analyze cognitive psychology as the new area in foreign policy decision making and its shortcomings in analyzing decision making in foreign policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran.