reaction

The Islamic Revolution of Iran in February 1979, as a major phenomenon like other great revolutions, has had wide-ranging global implications. Its Islamic nature, along with Iran's geopolitical and strategic position in the Middle East and the existence of corridors connecting Asia, Europe, and Africa, compelled the international relations scene to pay attention to this important development and its impact on the international arena. The purpose of this article is to answer the question of how the important theories of international relations have reacted to the actions and reactions of the Islamic Revolution in Iran? The emergence and spread of revolutionary theories and the creation of an ideology independent of dominant ideologies such as liberalism, communism, Arab nationalism, and Zionism led to a change in global beliefs and perspectives on new issues such as equality, human value in society, and divine nature. Therefore, if we consider the theories of international relations, which are mainly based on secularism, as machines with inputs and outputs, these machines were faced with a new undefined input that now needed to either change their definitions or ignore this input. This analogy shows that revolutionary theories have led to the emergence of a new perspective for the creation of complementary theories in order to be able to cover the shortcomings of these theories in combining religion and politics, just as the theory of balance of power covered the weaknesses of realism.

Reaction is a relative concept that is continuously used for the Islamic Revolution and all anti-colonial struggles. But the leaders of the Islamic Revolution believe that these struggles are anti-reactionary and positive movements. The present study examines this question that what is the meaning of the term reaction in the minds of the leaders of the Islamic Revolution and its opponents? ?(Problem) So analyzed the concept of reaction, its examples and contexts in the leaders of the Islamic Revolutions statements by Using author-centered hermeneutic method.(Method) And finally it was concluded that The possibility of changing the view from revolutionary Islam to passive Islam is the predominant meaning of reaction in the leaders of the revolutions statements, which they are constantly warning about its occurrence, but the Accusation of reaction arises from the arrogant approach of enemies Who consider any tendency that leads to the resistance of the people and challenges their colonial interests to reaction.(Results)

From the beginning of its victory until now, the Islamic Revolution of Iran has been involved in injuries and crises that were neutralized by the tact and instructions of the founders of the revolution and then the Supreme Leader of the Revolution and the vigilance of the people. The present study discusses reaction as a great harm to the Islamic Revolution from the perspective of the Supreme Leader; "Reaction" means to weaken, stop and return to the previous situationThis trait occurs after any revolution among individuals or groups in society who agree with the old, worn-out system and oppose progress. Reaction is one of the most important and dangerous components that threaten the Islamic Revolution.The hypothesis and the findings of the research show that the Supreme Leader considers reaction as a great danger for the revolution that arises by some revolutionaries and considers three factors as the reaction of the reaction; "Moving towards aristocracy", "trusting the affluent classes instead of paying attention to the oppressed and the weak" and "relying on foreigners instead of relying on the people". His Holiness considers the solution to this pest to be recognizing the goals of the revolution and its pillars.