شاخص سازی

Despite the importance of evaluating and judging cultural and artistic products, the lack of objective and clear criteria in film festivals, especially in Fajr Film Festival, has caused a lot of complaints and confusion among artists, and this important cultural, artistic and has faced many challenges. The first question that must be answered to evaluate movies is, what are the criteria for evaluating or judging the film? Unfortunately, there is no clear answer in this regard, and judges always use their knowledge and lived experience in judging without a brief or extensive explanation of the reasons for choosing or not choosing a film. Even if the arbitrator or group of arbitrators change, the selections and results of the arbitrator may also change. The reason for this is the lack of clear criteria for judging. Therefore, each judge makes criteria for himself based on the findings and aesthetic criteria he has for an art product and judges based on that. For this reason, in this research, an effort has been made to achieve the goal of turning the tacit knowledge of film festival judges and cinema experts into objective and explicit knowledge and providing clear criteria for evaluating movies and their jobs. This research has a qualitative approach and has used "database theory" as a research method. For this purpose, by using interviews, which is the most common method of extracting tacit knowledge at the individual level, the opinions of a group of experts related to the field of filmmaking, who have the record of judging various festivals, were collected, categorized and analyzed. placed Based on the collected data, criteria and indicators have been determined for each of the awards for the main filmmaking jobs. These criteria, which can be used in film festivals, are as follows in each section:Production: attention to the cultural needs of the society, creativity, importance of the subject, issues affecting the society, audience friendlinessCinematography: framing, image aesthetics, paying attention to the world of the text, helping the director to create the desired atmosphere, mastering the tools and technology, light and techniqueScreenwriting: importance of idea and subject, characterization, power of dialogue, plot, structureDirection: creativity, decoupage, mise-en-scène, story processing, paying attention to the cultural priorities of society Acting: mastery of the body and physical capacities in playing a role, awareness of one's individual capacity, mastery of speech in expressing dialogues,Attention to the world of the script, attention to the hidden details of the roleSuggestions: Based on the obtained results, in addition to presenting a basic suggestion and two correction suggestions, the application of indicators for conducting the judging process in the Fajr Film Festival has been emphasized with two conditions in the structural reform of the selection of selected works: the first condition is that the indicators Creating should not cause a qualitative process to become quantitative, and another condition is that the creation of indexes should not be considered as a monitoring tool to apply the opinion of managers and influence the artistic view of judges. Considering the mentioned conditions, it is suggested that the evaluation criteria of the movies in the desired jobs should be specified and informed to the participants through discussion with the judges before the festival, and university professors or critics who, in addition to paying attention to The formalist approach, they also pay attention to theoretical minutes, should be used in the group of judges.

Women's social security in urban spaces as multidimensional concept requires theoretical and conceptual studies in modeling and indexing stage .This study, by emphasizing importance of issue and need for study and policy-making for women's social security, to provide general model and indexing it. The study is developmental and applied in terms of purpose, and method, is Delphi and documentary. Studies in this field have been reviewed using documentary method and index have been designed and using Delphi method in three rounds and index have been reviewed and tested. Statistical population is professors, researchers in field of social security. Sampling was used to select panel members. In Delphi, in order to validate model and index, two groups of academic elites (experts in the field of social security) with eight people and law enforcement and security specialists (managers and social deputies of police organization and social deputy of justice) with four people have been used. After three rounds of model and index review by panel members, a multidimensional model has been obtained along with indexation of women's social security in urban spaces. This model is a multidimensional model in social, cultural, environmental and economic dimensions in which causal factors and mechanisms of social security in public spaces are specified. Result of presenting a general model and credit indexing has been found so that researchers and policymakers in this field can use it to study and promote women's social security in urban spaces.

The present study, considering the significant role of family social capital, has been used to measure and index the family social capital of police officers.

The main approach in this quantitative study was a survey and its statistical population included all law enforcement officers of East Tehran Province. 139 people were selected through random sampling and questionnaire with regard to two dimensions of social capital inside and outside the family and with emphasis on job background. Validity of the instrument by concurrent validity and high Cronbach's alpha coefficient (70%) indicated that the reliability of the research instrument was desirable. One-way and independent t-tests were tested using LISREL and SPSS software. Findings and

Based on the findings of the study, seven indicators were used to measure the social capital of the family of police officers: job perspective, social relationships, supervision, awareness and knowledge, family support, interaction between family members and family expectations. The results also show that the external social capital of the family is less important than the social capital within the police families, and therefore, the external dimension of social capital in police environments should be considered as in-house and inter-organizational think-tanks. It provided comprehensive planning by the Human Resources Department.

The goal of this article is to recognize criteria of the happy city approach through adapting it with urban space dimensions and access a model for measuring happiness rate in urban spaces. The research method is qualitative-quantitative, and in literature review it is based on content analysis. According to the historical position of Chahar Bagh-e-Abbasi Street and considering this issue that the street is also a realm for representation of such events, it was selected as the case. Sample case size for doing questionnaire technique was 200 users. The results show that for creating a happy urban space, both objective and subjective dimensions must be considered. Among this, the objective criteria affected on increasing happiness in street include factors like: creating limitation in accessing vehicles, beauty, vitality, utility of green spaces and townscape, cleanliness, and in subjective dimensions the criteria are: pride feelings, security, memory, night security and friendliness.

This study is about the indexation of police social status. Social status as a multidimensional concept requires theoretical and conceptual considerations at indexation and experimental stage in the development and formation process of measures. This study, emphasizing on the importance of this concept and the need for constant monitoring and assessing, seeks to design the indicator police social status provide its reliable measures.

The methods used in this study are Delphi and library studies. The previous studies have been criticized in the library study. Then, by analyzing the literature, extracting the key concepts and also using the strengths of previous studies, the theoretical models and indicators of police social status were formulated. Delphi also provided the framework to validate the indicators and measures seen by reference to a panel of experts in this field, expert opinions and their judgment about the indicators and measures were collected and employed.

After several rounds of review and the necessary reforms, the index of police social status was operationalized in three main dimensions with thirty-nine measures. In the end, the consensus of panel members about the applied standards and high quality of the measures and index to measure police social status was obtained. Because of its usability and whenever the researchers decide to measure police and security forces social status, the obtained index and standard questionnaire make it possible for them to include this index in their own statistical population and extract and use the results

Disruption in cohesion of society's institutions is studied in evolutionism and Functionalism- especially in transition period's discussions- and sociology. The purpose of this article is presenting a suitable index in macro experimental studies in sociology for measuring the disruption in Iranian society's institutions in current condition and its validity. Systemic cohesion and balance in functionalist theories has conceptual ambiguities, so measuring and building index will have some problems. Therefore at the first of this article concept of cohesion in Parsons Sociology is criticized on the basis of social entropy theory and finally the concept of disruption cohesion is replaced by cohesion and a suitable building index is done.

The most important concerns of every government in order to achieve social justice and development are to get rid of the social problems caused by poverty، illiteracy and unemployment،and to fulfill the economic، social and cultural needs of people to establish security and social justice. Therefore، it is forced to adapt appropriate policies for the allocation of resources and facilities available to different economic، educational، therapeutic and recreational sectors. To implement this issue، determining priority and the advantage of different sectors is the first step to be taken in order to allocate optimum sources and facilities. Obviously،with out social classification، planning for development would not be possible. One way to achieve the development of scientific classification is taxonomy. The main concern of this paper is to show the implementation of taxonomy method and advantages of this method for ranking different sectors، and، moreover، to explain how to determine the priority of each sector. This study is descriptive and the methodology used in ofthe document using secondary sources.

The present article is trying to show that how to recognize the indicators of power relationships within the families. Through qualitative research method it is shown how concepts and categories are constructed by using indicators collected through observation and deep interviews with spouses. Since the indicators can be very many and extremely varied، and much verbal and nonverbal behavior can be the indicators of power relationship between spouses، so all information collected are recorded and treated as raw data. After them (indicators) being classified and organized، the following 7 categories and the concepts stemming from them، seemed necessary for studying the power relationship in the families.