research

In today's world, knowledge and technology serve as the primary drivers of economic, industrial, and social development. Technological innovations are advancing at an unprecedented pace, reshaping lifestyles, production methods, and societal thought patterns. Within this context, universities play a crucial role in generating knowledge and training specialized human resources. Their collaboration with industry is widely recognized as one of the most effective means of translating knowledge into practical application. Despite Iran's significant scientific capacity, which includes over 2,138 higher education institutions and ranks 15th globally in scientific production, the connection between universities and industry remains weak. The country ranks 128th worldwide in this regard, highlighting an underutilization of university-generated knowledge to address the pressing challenges faced by its industry and economy. Additionally, despite its rich natural resources, Iran has primarily relied on the sale of raw materials due to shortcomings in technological exploitation, failing to develop high-yield processing industries. In this context, establishing a robust connection between academia and industry is not only essential for economic development, but also a vital strategy for enhancing employment, increasing productivity, reducing resource waste, and bolstering the country's economic resilience against sanctions and global crises.

In this study, a data-driven research methodology was employed. The research was conducted in Khuzestan Province, involving 44 provincial elites, including university professors and managers from knowledge-based companies and technology units. Participants were selected through theoretical and purposive sampling methods, with the theoretical sampling process continuing until saturation was achieved. Data collection involved in-depth and semi-structured interviews, while data analysis was conducted using theoretical coding techniques.

The results of this research revealed several key factors contributing to the persistent disconnect between industry and academia in Iran. These included government ownership of industries, a lack of prioritization for research within organizations, overreliance on government funding by universities, and inadequacy of internal research and technology centers within industries. Additionally, the focus on domestic markets for produced goods, a predominance of theoretical approaches over application-oriented methodologies in universities, and a misalignment between industry and educational institutions further exacerbated this issue. One of the most pressing challenges identified was the state-owned nature of the nation's economic structure, which limited competition among state-run companies. In this environment, industry managers were typically appointed by the government and received extensive financial support, encouraging a reliance on government budgets rather than fostering performance improvement and innovation. This dynamic diminished incentives for leveraging university resources and scientific expertise within the industry. Moreover, the abundance of natural resources, particularly oil, had intensified this reliance on primary production activities, detracting from efforts to innovate and adopt new technologies. As a result, industries experienced stagnation in innovation and a decline in product quality. In many sectors, research was often conducted more for show than for practical application, failing to enhance production processes or product quality. The structural organization of universities in Iran was primarily driven by governmental needs rather than regional planning and industrial requirements. This misalignment reduced incentives for universities to collaborate with industries in pursuit of income and credibility. Furthermore, the emphasis on theoretical education over practical applications hindered the development of effective connections between university and industry. Consequently, much university research remained unutilized, serving merely as a showcase. Additional barriers to collaboration stemmed from structural issues within organizations and industries, where internal research often yielded no tangible results. These challenges ultimately obstructed the establishment of a productive relationship between academia and industry in Iran. Therefore, this research underscores the urgent need for structural reforms in both the university and industry sectors to address these gaps and promote effective collaborations that will drive technological and innovative development in the country.

 In today’s complex and ever-changing world, the need to reconsider research methods and knowledge production is more pressing than ever (Shay, 2017). Restricting researchers to conventional qualitative methods steers new inquiries toward familiar frameworks, limiting advanced insights (Mazy, 2021). Thus, there is a demand for revisiting and innovating qualitative research approaches to address emerging challenges and generate new knowledge that yields distinct outcomes. The portrait method, as a research approach, facilitates deep exploration and higher understanding. By transcending rigid boundaries and imposed definitions, it offers an elevated comprehension of phenomena, replacing repetitive knowledge with creative insights that align with humanistic and societal ideals. This method transforms context, voice, relationships, and emerging themes into an aesthetic unity for researchers, participants, and audiences. Our understanding of portraiture continues to evolve (Holt, 2023). Despite numerous developments and perspectives, a significant gap remains in comprehending how these changes affect public perception and acceptance of portraiture (Silva, 2021). For instance, gaps exist in the analysis of portrait art (Kitcher, 2023) and its psychological and social dimensions (Yousimaki, 2021). Existing research in this field has substantial shortcomings in uncovering identity and emotions (Pful, 2021). As it stands, the gaps in contemporary portrait studies are vast, necessitating deeper research opportunities (Rabetsva, 2021). Engaging with this method requires sensitivity, empathy, and tolerance for ambiguity in both process and outcomes (Jangvard, 2015). Accordingly, this paper seeks to introduce the concept of portraiture, its advantages and characteristics, and its application principles (community, sampling, data collection, analysis, and validation) in humanities and social sciences research, particularly in educational management. 

 This study aims to explore portrait research methodology and employs a descriptive-analytical approach. Data were collected through a literature review, examining articles, academic documents, and primary sources on portraiture. The research was designed in several stages to provide a deeper understanding of this novel research approach. First, the concept of portraiture was described and explained, with a comprehensive review of key definitions and related concepts. Next, the core principles of the portrait method were examined, including participant voice reflection, the process of portrait formation in research, portrait analysis, validity in portraiture, and its use in educational settings. Finally, a summary of findings was discussed in the conclusion. This study offers a coherent and systematic analysis of portrait methodology, providing new insights in the field. As such, it serves as a valuable resource for researchers and students interested in innovative methods and restructuring existing frameworks.

Key findings from portrait research include:a) Reflecting Participant Voices: In portraiture, participants are active contributors to knowledge production, addressing societal needs. Knowledge is gathered through artistic and creative collaboration, stimulating active engagement. Researchers allow experiences to be described in ways influenced by political, economic, and cultural structures, fostering transformative change. The potential for decolonizing knowledge production leads to transformative learning. b) The Portrait Formation Process in Research: Portraiture is useful for exploring contextual relationships, documenting processes, and enabling researchers to engage with personal narratives in critical aspects of inquiry. The proposed analytical strategy serves two functions: detailing stories to illustrate processes and contexts, and revealing underlying causes and effects. Analytical steps include coding for characters, time, place, conditions, key events, and common themes (Rodríguez-Durán & Jacobs, 2020). c) Portrait Analysis: Data analysis in portraiture involves four stages after repeated engagement with participant voices: (1) receiving the story, (2) constructing poetry, (3) listening to opposing voices, and (4) writing the report (McCarthy, 2017). This interpretive balance between participant narratives and researcher reflections acknowledges participants as experts in their own lives (Anderson, 2012). This methodological effort to balance researcher interpretation with lived experience expertise defines narrative portraiture (Rodríguez-Durán & Jacobs, 2020). d) Validity in Portraiture: Ensuring integrity in portrait research rests with the researcher. Unlike quantitative research, where the investigator remains detached and objective, qualitative research—particularly portraiture—involves negotiation, proximity, and relational dynamics. According to Lightfoot (2005), crafting narrative portraits is a consultative, highly creative process requiring deep and flexible insight. Vital dynamics exist between documentation and narrative creation, reception and shaping, reflection and imposition, and improvisation. Coherence must emerge organically and interpretively (Lightfoot, 2005). e) Portraiture in Educational Settings: This method explores unique perspectives inaccessible through other research approaches, such as empirical studies. In portraiture, voices are discovered with varying degrees of constraint or presence, encompassing witnessing, interpretation, self-narration, and dialogue. These forms emerge through intersubjective relationships between researchers and participants in educational contexts (Rodríguez-Durán & Jacobs, 2020).

 Significant historical adaptations have been made to align with social, cultural, and technological developments (Stein, 2023). In 21st-century research, we have expanded our discourse to conceptualize data as stories, drawing from cross-cultural processes that emphasize collaboration in narrative construction (Woffen & Pickford, 2021). Portrait research primarily views inquiry as a tool for social change, emphasizing strengths and learning opportunities while minimizing the influence of socio-cultural, historical, and political contexts. This approach translates data into compelling, accessible narratives that resonate beyond academia. Each portrait emerges with its own meaning, learned through the images it creates. When shared with participants, their interpretations of lived experiences become evident. Researchers gain self-awareness through participant responses, perceiving themselves in varied and metaphorical ways. Portrait research resists conventional judgments, instead offering an art-based, phenomenological structure that provides rich interpretations of lived experiences. It occupies a middle ground between precision and quality, valuing portraiture as an unconventional yet meaningful companion in research.

This study aimed to design a competency model for faculty members of Farhangian University in Tehran Province. The primary objective was to identify and assess the required competencies of faculty members to enhance the quality of teaching and research in universities.

The research is applied in nature and employs an exploratory mixed-methods approach (qualitative-quantitative). The study population includes educational management experts in the qualitative section and all faculty members of Farhangian University in Tehran Province in the quantitative section. Data collection tools included semi-structured interviews in the qualitative section and questionnaires in the quantitative section. Data were analyzed using theoretical coding and confirmatory factor analysis.

The results showed that the competency model for faculty members consists of four main dimensions: ethical, scientific, communicative, and information technology competencies. Each of these dimensions includes several components and indicators that can help improve the quality of teaching and research at Farhangian University. For instance, ethical competencies encompass components such as decisiveness in performing duties and ensuring justice in the classroom.

The developed competency model can serve as a practical tool for assessing and improving the competencies of faculty members at Farhangian University. This model can help identify the strengths and weaknesses of faculty members and provide appropriate educational and developmental programs to enhance their performance.

The development of scientific, educational, and research collaborations requires extensive investigation and study, which is the focus of this research. The aim is to identify the development of defensive diplomacy of the Iranian Army Command and Staff University with friendly and allied countries through a scientific research approach. This study is applied in terms of its objective and descriptive in terms of method. The researcher utilized an exploratory mixed-method approach for data analysis. In the qualitative analysis process, dimensions and features were identified using a data-driven method, followed by path modeling using the Fornell-Larcker criterion. The statistical population for the quantitative section of the study consisted of 87 professors at the Iranian Army Command and Staff University in 2022, and sampling was done using Cochran’s table with simple random sampling. Therefore, 81 questionnaires, designed using the Likert scale, were distributed, and the data were analyzed using Smart PLS software. Based on the analysis of the codes extracted by the experts, three main categories were identified and classified: 1. Education with 10 subcategories, 2. Research with 9 subcategories, and 3. Requirements with 10 subcategories. The results of this research in the form of suggestions and based on the findings have been presented to the vice president of training and education, the vice president of planning and budgeting, the vice president of information and Command and Staff University.

From a humanist viewpoint, human reason elevates people above all other beings, positioning them at the pinnacle of the hierarchy and endowing them with rights. In posthumanism, however, the focus shifts away from humans as the center of the universe and questions their absolute control. This perspective challenges traditional hierarchies, highlighting the interconnectedness of everything throughout the world. By exploring the relationships between living and non-living entities, we can gain a deeper understanding of the universe. Posthumanism draws on the ideas of French philosophers Deleuze and Guattari, along with the theory of non-representation. Essentially, this perspective suggests that humans are part of a complex web of relationships with both living and non-living beings. The concept of non-representation emphasizes that it's not about how accurately we depict the world; instead, the focus is on how our experiences, emotions, and interactions with our surroundings, as well as with other humans and non-humans, are formed. Posthumanism indicates that a new paradigm is developing in humanities research, where the significance of matter, objects, and their roles in the research process is increasingly recognized. Barad suggests that in this paradigm, humans are not just causes or effects; they are integral parts of a world that is constantly evolving. This study, initially, aims to explore and clarify what post-humanist research is, and then, to examine how this kind of research is applied in the field of education. 

Considering the nature of this research, the approach taken will be both descriptive and analytical. Initially, the description, explanation, and analysis of post-humanism will be discussed. This will involve exploring the roots and foundations of this perspective, how this thought has developed, and the contexts surrounding it. Diverse data will be gathered from relevant sources, particularly primary texts and expert opinions in the field, along with a detailed description of posthumanism and its research methods. Next, the focus will be on posthumanism in education, aiming to describe, analyze, and clarify it. This part of the study will take the form of critical philosophical inquiry, with key goals including reducing ambiguity, enhancing understanding, and improving educational practices. Generally, this type of research aims to clarify and make concepts accessible to audiences, ultimately contributing to the advancement and enhancement of educational practices. Following the description, analysis, and clarification, various aspects of this approach and how it can be applied in education, considering both its strengths and weaknesses will be critically assessed.

At the heart of post-humanist education lie several key principles. This paper explores two vital tools for conducting this type of research: interviewing objects and observing their actions, as well as recording events. Interviewing objects is one of the primary methods in post-humanist research. This concept has two interpretations: the first involves directly engaging with the objects themselves, while the second pertains to interviewing humans while taking into account the presence and role of objects. The first interpretation is particularly relevant to digital objects and technologies, but this paper suggests that it aligns more with the idea of observation than with traditional interviews. The second tool involves closely observing how objects act and documenting events. This approach is significant in post-humanist research, especially in education, as it emphasizes the careful study of objects and their roles in different contexts. In humanist frameworks, objects are often viewed as passive beings without any real agency, leading us to overlook their potential contributions to research and knowledge creation. In contrast, the post-humanist perspective recognizes that all objects can exhibit some form of agency and can influence our actions and thoughts. Some researchers in this field frame the observation of object actions and the interactions between humans and non-humans within an ethnographic context, using terms such as materialist ethnography and post-humanist institutional ethnography.

In general, the post-humanist focus on the blurry lines between humans, animals, objects, and technologies raises concerns about the potential erosion of distinctly human traits like consciousness, creativity, and moral reasoning. The concern is that by merging these boundaries, posthumanism might weaken the unique status and moral standing of humanity. When humans are placed on the same level as other beings, it risks diminishing their status and could lead to a loss of their special dignity. If humans exist within a complex web of material, discursive, and technological influences, then the notion of education as a means to cultivate individual skills and autonomy becomes challenging. The emphasis on materiality, technology, and the world beyond humans in posthumanism may overlook the crucial social, cultural, and political aspects of education. Since post-humanist research often centers on the relational creation of knowledge with material objects, it primarily examines the relationship between humans and non-humans. As a result, the unique interactions among humans and the dynamics between students and teachers are frequently overlooked. This neglect can complicate our understanding of the educational process and its various dimensions. Additionally, it's important to note that many studies on post-humanist topics are abstract and theoretical, which may hinder their application in real-world contexts to tackle pressing ethical, political, and social issues.

Today, Max Weber is widely known as one of the founding fathers of sociology and his opinions are taught in universities. Many Iranian sociologists consider themselves influenced by Weber in various ways and take help from his opinions in their research to understand the social situation in Iran. In this article, an attempt has been made to show that Weber's presence in Iran can be better understood if we study him in the context of the "Cultural Cold War" which had affected the intellectual atmosphere of Iran during this period. In this view, Weber is considered a thinker who reached Iranians through Cold War interpretations, was reproduced in Cold War institutions, and influenced Iranians in the context of Cold War. In this framework, it will be shown that the Institute of Social Studies and Research at the University of Tehran played the most important role in introducing Weber's work to Iranians, and in this direction, the texts of two of Weber's most important commentators, Talcott Parsons and Raymond Aron, have played a significant role.

According to the establishment law of the Ministry of Science, Research and Technology, the task of planning, granting licenses, monitoring and evaluating research institutions (both private and public) is under the charge of this ministry. By the end of the spring of 1402,165 private research institutes recieved their licenses in five fields: humanities and social sciences, art and architecture, technical and engineering, basic sciences and agriculture. However, emerging some challenges including the increasement of research costs and the inability to attract and maintain specialized human resources, many of these institutions bankcrputed. Yet, comparing the performance of these institutions to peer institutions, bring out some doubts for STI policymakers concerning to their effectiveness. In this article, employing qualitative methods, thematic analysis and relevant techniques, The most important obstacles to the establishment and development of these institutions have been identified, and corresponding solutions have been proposed to the policy-making and implementing bodies in this field. The result of thie research shows the imbalance and heterogeneous distribution of private research institutes in Iran, such that Tehran province hosts 70% of private research institutes in the country, there is not any private research institution in 14 provinces of the country. It worth mentioning, the duties and position of private research institutes do not define in the roadmap of research activities in Iran.

The status of the Institute of Social Studies and Research, which commenced operations in the 1950s as part of the Faculty of Literature at the University of Tehran, is a pivotal inquiry in academic sociology in Iran. The majority of studies examining the institute regard sociology as an extraneous discipline unrelated to the field.This article employs critical history and document analysis to demonstrate that an examination of this position is unattainable without knowledge of the social environment in which the institution originated.The society of Iran has been depicted. Conversely, by addressing this inquiry, we are able to discern not only the prevailing trends in Iranian sociology, but also the origins and indications of the frailty and distress that currently afflict Iranian social sciences. With respect to this matter, the majority of analysts have examined the historiography of academic sociology in Iran. However, this perspective is disproportionate to the materials of this history, as we shall demonstrate that their primary emphasis is on the viability or rejection of social sciences in Iran.The findings will demonstrate that this scholarly establishment originated from the social concerns and requirements of Iran, and that throughout its development, sociology in Iran attempted to provide solutions to these issues and necessities. Our research indicates that historical information regarding contemporary Iranian society cannot be discerned by focusing solely on external factors.

The use of actor-network theory (ANT) as a methodological (and ontological) framework has been increased dramatically in recent years. Researchers from a variety of fields have found some methodological and ontological intuitions in ANT. However, there have always been some ambiguities in what this framework really is and how it is applicable in qualitative researches. In this paper, we reconstruct the methodological framework of ANT; we propose a four-step methodological framework in which data can be gathered, organized, and evaluated. First of all, we will extract the key ontological elements of actor-network theory and based on that, we will talk about some of its general methodological rules based on the main sources of this theory. Then, using the tools or concepts of semiotics, phenomenology, and ethnography, we propose a four-stage methodological framework for ANT-based qualitative research along with their strategies, methods, and tools, and we will answer some questions.

Due to its transdisciplinary nature, the field of future studies is a meeting place of various topics, one of the most important topics; The images are from the future. The aim of this research was to analyze scientific articles on the subject of images of the future in the most prestigious scientific journals in the world, which provided a mapping of scientific productions related to images of the future, regarding which fields, individuals, publications, organizations and countries contributed to the publication of articles on images of the future, as well as what highly cited articles and topics were trending between 2019 and 2024. The present research is of applied type and has been carried out by using scientific methods and in particular the analysis of synonyms and co-occurrence. The statistical population of this research is Web of Science (2019 to 2024) and VOS Viewer software was used to draw scientific maps. The results have shown that the fields of history and sociology are the most used fields, Russia has the most researchers, future images, artificial intelligence and science are trending topics, and people such as Arran Gare, Petri Tapio, and Victor Tito have done the most research on future images.

 The purpose of this study was to identify and analyze the functions of the higher education system with a regional management approach. In order to achieve this goal, a qualitative approach and case study method were used. The statistical population of the study was the director general and senior experts of the educational and research departments of the Ministry of Education and the Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution. Based on the theoretical saturation of the data, 11 of them were studied. In-depth interview method was used to collect data and inductive content analysis method was used to analyze them. The research findings showed that the functions that can be transferred to the higher education system include research functions, educational functions, student cultural functions, and staff functions. The results also showed that among the reliable research functions, prioritizing functions by organizing research facilities and creating and developing research units and technology centers, and among educational functions, prioritizing functions by creating, merging and deleting disciplines, and monitoring the quality of presentation. Courses, monitoring the outcomes of the disciplines and among the functions of the transferable staff, prioritizing the functions with the functions of student welfare, special case commissions at the district level, dealing with administrative violations, planning and holding festivals Student and among the transferable administrative and financial functions, welfare planning should be completely entrusted to the regions. According to the research results, in order to delegate functions to the regions,

The Ministry of Science, Research and Technology and its subordinate actors, as one of the crucial sub-systems in the national innovation system, play a vital role in the structure, functions, and performance of the national innovation system. In this regard, the current research was conducted with the aim of identifying and prioritizing the functions and sub-functions of the Ministry of Science, Research, and Technology in the national innovation system. In terms of methodology, this research is mixed research that has benefited from thematic analysis in the qualitative part and importance-performance analysis in the quantitative part. In the qualitative part, the review of international documents, laws and regulations, and upstream documents and the analysis of data related to focus groups with different stakeholders led to the preparation of a list of 60 sub-functions under the 7 main functions of the Ministry of Science, Research, and Technology. Then, to achieve the priority sub-functions of the Ministry of Science, Research, and Technology, the importance-performance questionnaire was sent to universities, research institutes, and science and technology parks, and 33 completed questionnaires were collected. Based on the importance-performance analysis, 40 sub-functions were selected as priority sub-functions (low performance and high importance) of the Ministry of Science, Research and Technology. Identifying the priority sub-functions of the Ministry of Science, Research and Technology can be a basis for a more accurate functional and performance analysis and formulation of policies and programs in order to strengthen the role of this Ministry in the national innovation system.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the factors affecting the qualitative promotion of science and research development in Kermanshah and Sanandaj Azad Universities. The research method was applied in terms of purpose and survey in terms of data collection. The statistical population of the study included all faculty members of Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj and Kermanshah branches (298 people), of which 222 people were selected as the sample size using simple random sampling method. A researcher-made questionnaire was used to collect data. The validity of the questionnaire was estimated through face and content validity and their reliability by experimental implementation of the questionnaire in a sample of 30 people through Cronbach's alpha 0.878. SPSS 22 software was used to analyze the data. The results of Friedman test showed that from the perspective of researchers and faculty members, the components of education, financial resources, specialized human resources, university organizational culture and management, respectively; affect the quality of research in the university. Among these indicators and factors such as evaluating the quality of graduates by obtaining the opinion of stakeholders, employers and other organizations and companies, selecting interested and talented researchers to encourage students, creating information technology infrastructure to facilitate access to scientific information and Technically, a specific program in order to self-govern parts of the university with the aim of financial independence and increase revenue and decentralization of financial management topped the items related to these factors.

In line with the development of innovation, one of the most important things that should be taken into consider by policymakers at different levels is to address the characteristics that distinguish firms active in a certain field.By taking into account the environmental and local differences, as well as the internal differences of the firms, how innovative activities are carried out, the type of research and development costs of the firms, the type of market they are considering and many other indicators that have been addressed by various researchers, they can Identify different firms and study their activities and set appropriate policies.In this research, by identifying the innovative activities, a new typology of firms in the oil and gas sector has been presented, and finally, according to the findings of the investigation of innovative activities and the data related to the national innovation survey plan of Iran, the appropriate framework for the development of innovation in this sector are suggested.By hierarchical clustering, 73 selected oil and gas Firms were classified into 4 clusters, which are: (1) firms focused on cooperation and networking and internal routines, (2) firms focused on research and development and internal routines, (3) firms focused on research and development and (4) firms focused on research and development and networking and cooperation. Then the policy framework in order to encourage innovation were presented and examined for each cluster.

"Methodology of Political Science" aims to collect, classify, describe and analyze research methods in political science. Dr. Haghighat's book entitled "Methodology of Political Science" has tried to review and critique most of the existing methodologies in the field of political science. The chapters of the book have a good consistency and the esteemed author has adopted a coherent method in reviewing and criticizing the methods. In some cases, paying attention to the indigenous atmosphere of Iranian society has made the contents of the book more useful. Paying attention to the distinction between research method and methodology is one of the highlights of the present study. On the other hand, obscurity in the definition of humanities and politics, lack of a clear criterion for classifying research methods, and ambiguity in methodological pluralism are among the most important shortcomings of the book. The respected author considers the methodology of social and political sciences as part of the philosophy of these sciences. But in the study of methods, the emphasized meaning of methodology has been seriously neglected. There is a conflict between the vagueness and the predicament of the concepts discussed in the book and the claim of uncertainty in the humanities. Pluralism is defended in the field of methodology, but the multiplicity and diversity of meanings of the concepts in political science in general and Iranian society, in particular, is rejected as a crisis and ambiguity.

The continuous monitoring and evaluation of research and technology provides a basis for policy makers to deal with evidence-based policymaking or reforming research and technology policies with a comprehensive view. Based on this, the main goal of this research is to analyze the extent to which the quantitative goals of research and technology have been achieved in the sixth development plan based on a systematic approach under the four categories of input, output, consequence and impact indicators and subsequently to extract key lessons in order to prepare the document for the country's future development plans. To this end, the qualitative methodology of document study has been used for the purpose of indexing analysis of performance evaluation of the sixth development program in the field of research and technology. The findings of the research indicate that from the perspective of conceptual design, the indexing system of research and technology under the sixth development plan lacks sufficient balance. In the final part, it is emphasized that as an alternative to the outdated approach of using absolute indicators, the use of relative and combined indicators brings the possibility of more accurate evaluations of the suitability, efficiency, effectiveness and usefulness of research and technology. Also, the policy makers should provide solutions to focus more on the long-term impact of research and technology at the community level by using appropriate indexing.

The current research was conducted with the topic of economic policy uncertainty and companyvalue: the mediating role of intellectual capital and research and development. The research is considered to beapplied in terms of purpose and in terms of descriptive-correlational method. The statistical population of thisresearch is all the companies of Tehran Stock Exchange during the years 2014 to 2016. The sample used wasalso selected through the method of systematic exclusion from the statistical population, in this order, 114companies have been selected as the research sample, to examine and test the hypotheses. Research dataanalysis was done using EVIEWS10 software and regression test. The results showed that there is a positive andsignificant relationship between economic policy uncertainty and social responsibility; Intellectual capital has apositive and significant effect on the relationship between social responsibility and company value; Intellectualcapital has a positive and significant effect on the relationship between corporate governance and companyvalue; Research and development has a positive and significant effect on the relationship between socialresponsibility and company value, and research and development has a positive and significant effect on therelationship between corporate governance and company value.

“Kelileh va Demneh”, translated by Abul Maali Nasrullah bin Muhammad Munshi, is one of the valuable and lasting works of Persian prose of the 6th century, which has been edited and published many times in Iran and abroad. Undoubtedly, the revised edition of Mojtaba Minavi in 1343 in Tehran is the best of them. Among the other corrections and explanations of this book, which researchers do not need to refer to when reading the text of “Kelileh va Demneh”, the correction and annotations are by Ayatollah Hassan Hassanzadeh Amoli, who published the sixth edition of it in 2019 from Bostan publisher. Although Ayatollah Hassan Hassanzadeh Amoli prepared this work from several manuscripts and with Arabic “Kelileh va Demneh”, and he also reminded me of the misreading, distortions, and other defects in the printed documents, the author has found errors and slips in the correction, research, and annotations of Ayatollah Hassan Hassanzadeh Amoli of “Kelileh va Demneh”, which he criticizes and evaluates some of them by comparing the printings of Minawi and Gharib as well as some other manuscripts in this essay.

Considering that the study of social systems is the basis of organizational research, the present study was conducted with the aim of analyzing the factors affecting the productivity of educational organizations with emphasis on social systems in a qualitative way from the Grounded Theory. The statistical population of the study was a group of experts in the field of productivity. 25 people were randomly selected as a sample. The data collection tool was a semi-structured interview with productivity experts. by conceptual analysis of data, 20 organizational factors affecting productivity, 16 organizational barriers to productivity, 12 organizational factors underlying productivity, 35 strategic organizational factors, 20 causal factors and 7 organizational outcomes around the five main axes of education, research, culture, student and credits and facilities were obtained. Finally, the results were presented as five hypotheses and a model.