جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « کنشگران مرزی » در نشریات گروه « علوم اجتماعی »

The duality of agency-structure regarding collective hypocritical behavior among Iranians has long been the subject of debate and controversy. In the meantime, some agency and others have considered the existing structure in the society as the main cause of this misbehavior. The current research aims to deeply investigate the causes of hypocritical behavior and provide a model to rectify it by focusing on the institution of education. The approach of qualitative and interdisciplinary research has been using data from sociology, psychology, law, literature, political science, international relations, etc. Data coding continued until theoretical saturation using the theme analysis method. The main categories are identified in the section on the cause of hypocritical behavior under the domination of the Giddens structure-action meta-theory. This theory considers the social norm as the result of agency-structure action. Doing so, oversimplification of hypocritical behavior, the negation of individuality, and historical determinism for the category of agency and state (organizational) monopoly, authoritarianism, the use of religion as a tool, and the autocracy of some managers, placing tradition against modernity and a sense of social despair against existing injustices emerged for the category of structure. Based on the requirements and limitations of the education proposal, meanwhile observing the theory of boundary actors, the categories of implementing the principle of meritocracy, and allocating competent resources, inserting the courses of moral philosophy and human rights in the curriculum, creating space for expert psychologists, trying to restore social capital, using every opportunity to create the context of modernity, implementing knowledge management, and consensus building in carrying out efficient civil action was also emerged as alternatives.

Tunisia in contrast with the other Arabic countries, why and how has a democratic transition (and relatively successful) after the revolutions of Arab Spring? To this short and simple answer, it couldn’t make the fast and brief response and necessarily, via contributing to a contextual theoretical framework, the archive consists of Tunisian endeavors (elites and the ordinary people) must be explored to specify the achievement of Tunisia and its 2011 revolution had not been gained instantly and accidentally. Moreover behind it, being of cumulative lived/historical experiences would be existing. So, as a methodological remark, the historical/cultural context of Tunisia - as a tolerating and peaceful context - is analyzed in this article to be shown which public policy makings of pre-revolutionary governments had institutionalized the political/legal superstructures on this cultural base to keep the achievements of Tunisia revolution. Finally, as a result, establishing of vice-presidential administration is suggested to practice dialogue and negotiating compromise; in particular consideration should be given by its public policy-makers to the main outcome of this research – as a methodological axiom – in which just through the peaceful cultural context with a communal cooperative sense (like Tunisia), then economical rising and public welfare in Iran will be ascertained.