سوره آل عمران

There is no doubt that contemporary translators have translated the verses of Surah Al-Imran based on the multiple meanings of the words. But this important issue is raised whether this difference in understandings of the structure of the unit of words also took place in the translations and interpretations of the early centuries. In this article, the issue of the existence of polysemous words in the Holy Qur'an and the application of how to translate them by translators has been investigated in a descriptive-analytical and inferential way, and the results have been presented using the most important and authentic translations and interpretations of the early centuries. The findings of the research show that most of the words and expressions of this surah follow the system of multiple meanings. The belief of the early translators and commentators in the principle of polysemy in the translation of the words of this surah is also evident in their works. The ancient Persian language is also so powerful that it has been able to translate the words of revelation with pure Persian constructions. The results of the analyzes make it clear that using the principle of polysemy in translation makes it possible to achieve the layers of meaning of the verses and provides the context for the Qur'an to respond to human needs.

Undoubtedly, one of the most important interpretive sources after the Holy Quran is the use of the hadiths of the infallible. In each period, the rate of use of these hadiths by commentators has been different. In contemporary times, utilizing hadiths in interpretation according to new questions has been of special importance. One of these interpretations with a new and idiomatic approach is sample interpretation. Now, the question is how much this interpretation has benefited from the hadiths of the infallible. One of the interpretations that have interpreted the Holy Quran with this approach is the sample interpretation. Now, the question arises as to what is the quantity and quality of using this interpretation of the hadiths of the infallible Imams. In this research using a descriptive-analytical method, looking at the sample interpretation and case study of Surah Al-Imran, it was concluded that he used the hadiths of the infallible in the following cases: Expressing the virtues and importance of the subject of the surah and verse, The reason for the revelation of the verses, Confirmation of the commentator's interpretive point of view, Determining and developing the meaning of the word, Explaining the examples of the verse, removing the ambiguity of the verse, and using hadiths in favor of an interpretation. By using these hadiths, he has been able to provide suitable and useful spiritual and intellectual food for the current generation.

One of the teachings of the Ahl al-Bayt (AS) in expressing the teachings of the Holy Quran is to open a new window in harmony with time called interpretation. The verses of the Qur'an, in addition to what their appearance is used, have interpretations and the best way to achieve the interpretation of the Qur'an is through the Ahl al-Bayt (AS); Because according to the hadith of Saqaleen, the Ahl al-Bayt (AS) are considered as the just of the Qur'an. In many narrations of Ahl al-Bayt (AS), the verses of the Qur'an have been interpreted. This research seeks to find an answer to the question that what kind of interpretations have been made towards the Commanders of the Faithful in the interpretive narrations of Surah Al-Imran? In this regard, based on the idiomatic meaning of Qur'anic interpretation in verses and narrations, interpretive narrations related to Imam Ali (AS) were extracted from the interpretive narrations of Surah Al-Imran and by descriptive-analytical method it was determined that five types of interpretations in these narrations about that Imam (AS) There are: the esoteric meaning of the verse, the esoteric instance of the verse, the instance of the atom of the application or the generality of the verse, the realization of the meanings of the verse and the meaning of the similar verse.

Comparative or comparative studies have been considered in the present century, because in this type of studies, the advantages and disadvantages of theories are revealed. The present study, in order to obtain the differences and commonalities of the three interpretations of Majma 'al-Bayyan, Al-Mizan and Tasnim, verses 83-81 of Surah Al-Imran in a descriptive-analytical and comparative method from the point of view of three commentators, namely Sheikh Tabarsi, Allameh Tabatabai And Ayatollah Javadi Amoli examines. In this research, first Surah Al-Imran and the desired interpretations will be introduced and then the relevant verses of all three interpretations will be considered and the theories of the commentators will be compared and compared with each other. The results of the article indicate that; While all three commentators have tried to interpret the verses that are in the same context, in one section and not separately, there is also a parallel between the comments of the commentators. Also, one of the best ways to deeply understand the verses of the Holy Quran and the influence of the divine verses in the heart and soul, is to use comparative interpretation.

Undoubtedly, in order to understand the Qurchr('39')an, the audience must be aware of the angles of the revelation of the Qurchr('39')an, culture, customs, environment, dignity and means of revelation.Such an understanding will not be achieved without concerning whatever said. This article is to examine the relationship between the first verses of the surah   Al-Imran and the event of Mubahila in three parts with the plan of dating Surah Al-Imran and the historical event of Mubahila, a study of signification and authenticity of  verses and narrations, correspondence and the arrival of tribes in Medina, gives a clear and correct understanding of the non-coincidence of the revelation of the verses of Surah Al-Imran and the event of Mubahila. The concurrence of verse 61 of Al-Imran with the occurrence of Mubahila, caused confusion caused by revelation and coincidence in revelation.  Surah Al-Imran has been revealed in the third year by examining the authenticity and signification, considering the narrations of the order of revelation and definite historical events in the verses. Despite the fact that Mubahila is a definite historical event, it does not coincide with the decline of Al-Imran. The article is written by descriptive-analytical method and using verses, narrations and historical documents.

Pragmatic application of the verses of social interaction of Islam with other montheistreligions with emphasis on verse 93 of sura Al-ImranAbstractApplied knowledge is a branch of linguistics that can be included in the field of interpretation of the Qur'an and reveal the semantic dimensions of these verses at the level of serious intent and to interpret and explain the meanings of the parts of the words during the application and based on the conditions and time and place of production of the parts.The Holy Qur'an has repeatedly addressed the issue of food, lawful and unlawful. This is always linked to one of the aspects of prophecy and mission, especially the need to follow the messenger and the chosen person of God to avoid going astray. According to verse 93 of Al-Imran, it can be said that among the God-fearing nations before the revelation of the Torah, the matter of sanctity and sanctity was returned to the religious leader.The practical approach to understanding this verse shows that the subject of food and eating is a matter of dimensions, the design of which is intertwined with different topics and concepts in the Holy Quran, and of course, the concept of monotheism and prophethood of the Prophet of Islam.

Abu Abdullah Muhammad Ibn Waqid was a 2nd century AH historian, who in his book “Al-Maghazi” at the end of studying each campaign of the Prophet based on the Quran’s Surahs, commented on the details of the story and clarified the words like a commentator who explained the meaning of the verses. Repeated references of different commentators to his book in various times in the history shows that it is not only an important source in the Islamic history, but also a trusted reference for the commentators. The present study, with an analytical – descriptive approach case study of the Battle of Uhud, tried to find different forms of Waqidi’s explanations in interpretation and the stances of other commentators from the third to the tenth century AH in three different areas of narrating, referencing, and rejecting his explanations. Based on the findings of this study, Waqidi’s narrations in commentaries of 17 verses from 22 verses especially in illustrating historical details based on Quran’s verses, Hadiths, and verses’s form were accepted by commentators. His narrations are traced in other references according to the time and the audiences, as his interpretations are more significant in narrative and ijtihadi commentaries of the sixth century AH