جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "نظریه پردازی" در نشریات گروه "فلسفه و کلام"

The purpose of this study is to critique the status and role of proposal forms for doctoral programs in the humanities in the production of Islamic humanities.

In general terms, Rational; purpose, Fundamental; Nature, descriptive-analytical; data collection method, library-based.

the results of the survey indicate: 1. The difference between basic research and the foundation data method; 2. "Philosophical foundations" are the most important entry point for the introduction of indigenous values, norms and culture into theories; 3. The choice of research method goes back to the researcher's assumptions about methodology; 4. Method in basic research precedes theory; 5. The main factors in choosing the method are: the problem and the subject under study, the purpose of the research and the basics of ontology, epistemology, anthropology, arithmetic and methodology.

First, The current proposal forms are a roadmap that not only does not guide students to one of the foundational and ijtihad approaches to the production of science within the framework of Islamic thought, but also guides students in the opposite direction to the production of science and theorizing. Secondly, in the method of fundamental research, assumptions about the basics have a central place and these basics should be included in the proposal forms.

True questioning of Iranian and Islamic Aesthetics is the first step to reach better understanding of this field of study. In interpreting “art” and “beauty” we need to avoid prescriptive approaches, over generalizations, giving unnecessary holy meanings or basing our investigations on finding synonyms of “art” and “beauty” in ancient or classic texts. Normally, discussions on Iranian art and culture’s fundamental principles and theory start with finding synonyms of art and beauty in classic texts, without considering the fact that the meaning of these words have changed during the history, and also there is a fundamental theoretical difference between traditional and contemporary art. In contemporary aesthetics beauty and art is subjective and related to hand made human objects while in mystic approach (traditional one) beauty and art are supposed to be an ontological and existential products of God who creates nothing but beauty. Instead, we need to see the problem realistically through methodologically problem-based approach. The present study is about to avoid the usual starting point for finding the theoretical foundations of Islamic and Iranian Art and Aesthetics; i.e., finding the synonyms of “art” and “beauty” in mystic texts. We should consider the fact that beauty in classic and theoretical texts is considered to be an ontological characteristics of the world in general while in the contemporary world beauty is mostly considered as subjective feature. Iranian art is mostly decorative in architecture, and narrative in painting and illustration, and finally romantic and didactic in literature. Among these arts, we can only find some theoretical discussions in literature regarding the interpretation of beauty and evaluating the works of art (literary texts). Such discussions are gathered under the name of “Elme Badie” that is somehow synonyms with the meaning of rhetoric. Elme Badie is able to describe, and interpret all figures of speech with extended examples and advanced terminology. It seems that this field of study should be revived and used as the first step in aesthetics studies in order to understand the taste of Iranian and Islamic taste of beauty and art. Any investigation in Islamic or Iranian aesthetics ought to start from this first step to be able to formulate the problem realistically and methodologically. In fact, this paper proposes that instead of finding the roots of Persian Aesthetics, i.e., discussions on art and beauty in Islamic mystic texts, we should consider the fact that Persian Rhetoric or Elme Dabie has established itself as a alternative aesthetic theory; however, it remained mainly focused on literary discussions. Persian Rhetoric has long obsessive discussions on defining literary terms and finding proper examples for them. There are number of reasons why Persian Rhetoric never involved with aesthetics as the theory of visual arts like religious barriers, and authoritarian structure of the states who always encouraged conservative romantic and didactic literature instead of visual arts. Therefore, we can surely say that Persian Rhetoric developed to be an alternative theory of aesthetics in a social and political conditions where comprehensive aesthetics theory was not possible.

Man has always tried to achieve new scientific findings in order to know more about the world around him to the extent that there is a direct relationship between scientific progress and change in lifestyle and human beings enjoy the phenomena of the universe. In the meantime, understanding the essence, the end and ultimate of science in its specific meaning, that is, empirical knowledge, has long been a great question for thinkers. Accordingly, some consider the infinity of science and some other believe in the full maturity of science. Each of the the Three linear, rotational, and hierarchical theories have believers who have explained the evolution and end of science from their own point of view, however,Qur'anic logic-based knowledge suggest a different manifestation of the end of science and the long horizon of the border of science production. It seems that scrutiny in the semantic field of the verses of conquest in the Holy Quran is a great tool to obtain a solid Quranic theory which is different from the common theories of the evolution of common scientific knowledge in the world. From the Quranic point, human being has the capacity and potentiality to achieve whatever exists in the skies and the earth, so the end point of human science is the realization of that potential power.

This study tries to present a method for using the Grounded Theory (GT) in offering a theory based upon religious texts, by studying its compatibilities and incompatibilities with Islamic thought.
This study has employed second order studies and philosophy of knowledge methodology.
In order to use GT in religious texts, we need to provide some preconditions and steps. Several preparatory actions are needed: such as defining the subject and terminology, the use of methods for obtaining and correct reading of the Islamic texts, and determining the criteria for validating narratives. Also, the methods and ways of using the various stages of the GT and related texts, analyzing data and information and coding should always be considered.
The method of GT has capacities and the flexibility needed to construct a theory in all fields, especially in the use of religious texts.

The present research aims to assess the needs of curriculum syllabus of supplementarycourses of islamichumanities in order to improve and strengthen the theorization in the academic staff members of Department of humanities based on religious foundations.
This research benefited needs assessments with qualitative approach through interviews with key informants and snowball sampling. The data for two purposes (recognitionkey informants’ approach to humanities and islamic humanities and syllabus are suggested by the key informants) was analyzed.
The results showed that the dominant approach to key informants was west- selected approach and syllabus suggestedfor improve and strengthen the theorization in the academic staff members that was divided All syllabus obtained into 4 major topics of Islam, science and religion, humanities, and theory and theorization.
The authors concluded that if so, it seems this syllabus in these courses can be taken to make significant changes. With regard to the improvement and strengthening of theorizing based on religious teachings andthe islamic human sciences, the most important achievements in the humanities is an ending point to exclusivism of the west.

Localization of theories is becoming necessary for the application in special situations and various cultures. Because of religious requirements in religious societies, this issue is much more important. On this basis, islamization of theories in human sciences can be both the factor for development and dynamism of islamic society and their realizations. On this basis, our question is, which path we can walk in this field of knowledge and realization of theories in our society.
In this study, we used descriptive analysis which is among theoretical research group.
The results of the survey indicate that islamization of theories and knowledge, is not just theorizing according to Islam, but interaction, coordination and compliance of these theories with Islam and its regulations one hand and societies’ conditions on the other hand. And this is of important elements of islamization especially in the field of human sciences theories in general, which not only do not deny them, but it leads to restructuring and adapting of islamic requirements and our own conditions.
In this study, we find that what we learn about the world is only possible by islamization of theories and local theorization which both can meet efficiency and suitability for our country and have compatibility with teachings of islamic-iranian culture. In addition, religious (islamic) theorization in human sciences in every society refers to a set of structured and complicated concepts which involves the totality of culture, politics and society. In this regard, our position is based on attitude , moderation and virtuosity and compliance with traditions of islamic-iranian culture in order to make desirable knowledge

In spite of emphasis of Muslim logicians on the instrumental role of logical principles and regulations in the other acquired sciences as well as the entire spheres of human thinking، there has been no considerable effort to consolidate and actualize them by now. Thus in this paper we intend to analyze the efficiency of that knowledge and skill in the whole process of theorization، from the formation of the theory to its verification as well as inference of new hypothesis taken by the theories in question. Given that there are several methods of theorization in sciences، such as conceptualization، causal explanation، evidential explanation، inductive inference، and deduction، in this article، we try to explain these methods one by one and indicate the role and the efficiency of logical skill. In addition، we try to analyze the relation between two new western programs entitled “critical thinking” and “philosophy for children” as well as their impact on development of logical thinking، theorization and production of science. The necessity of embarking on the theoretical and actual education of the logical skills including formal logic and symbolic logic as well as consolidating the status of critical thinking in the national educational system are among the most important conclusions in this study. It can result in facilitating in the process of theorization and production of science in the various branches of sciences، either humanities or empirical sciences. Although some theorists are gifted an innate logic which regulates their thinking process inherently، they could certainly pave the road more easily by achieving the logical skills.

The purpose of this study is to analyze the barriers in developing free speech tables and scientific discussions based on the ideas of ghom Islamic azad university scientific members. The method of the present article is descriptive-survey and statistical community of the research included all scientific members and 120 of them were selected by random stratified sampling method. Data collection is through questionnaire and validity of. /89 based on likert scale. In order to analyze the data deductive statistical, Z test and variance (F) are used. The results of the survey indicate the preventing role of following factors in order: cultural, policy making system, official and structural, research services, and provocation factors. Based on the ideas of ghom Islamic azad university scientific members; cultural factors are the most important factor, lack of organizational support is the most effective factor and elites ignorance on the aims and structure of free speech tables is the least effective barrier. The author of the article concludes the major challenges in the way of free speech table's development as follow: culture development, research development, cooperation, knowledge sharing, and team work.

Nowadays، Thousands of English and Persian scientific articles are produced Annual and total of Journals and Depth research، are growing Tenfold than the past. So، is the Science growing such the total of articles and ISI in our country? In this article، being discussed with the Challenge to Common Criteria Journals of Research and Review gave no idea of the scientific Ideational method about the actual criteria scientific article. And finally، introduction and providing two criteria of the Benefit method and repeatability and Verification for the other researches along with the synergy of science and having new ideas as Fundamental standards of science as being an article. Also providing Procedures to produce scientific papers.

The relationship between theory and observation is among the subjects to which various schools of social sciences give different responses based on their ontological and epistemological views. Due to the different viewpoints existing in Islamic philosophy about the resources and means of knowledge on one hand and about the levels of reality and knowledge on the other hand, the nature, theory, observation and, naturally, the relationship between theory and observation will be different. From the viewpoint of Islamic philosophy, there are different types of theory, empirical, rational, intuitive and transformational, and each type can have critical and normative dimensions. Obviously, each category of these theories belongs to an appropriate source and its character is evaluated. Therefore, "observation" alone is not a suitable source for any of these theories and a "test" can assess only some aspects of empirical theories.

In spite of the special importance of the subject of humanities, due to the key role which this field of study plays in reviving the religio-national culture and in fostering technological advance, it has neither received due attention nor does it enjoy a good status in the universities in Iran. The present research attempts, through a theoretical analysis based on documentation, to investigate the condition of this subject in the light of thesupreme leader´s views. The result of the research shows that, according to the supreme leader´s view, the main challenges to the huminities in the universities in Iran are anti-religious and materialistic principles, western character, unconditioned acceptance of western models and products, ignoring the important status of the eletè, scholars and the institutes which are concerned with huminities activities. The research concludesthat in the view of the supreme leader the most effective ways of improving the present condition of the huminities are: extracting the principles of this field of study from religion, indigenousness, theorization, development of science, scientific innovations and giving special attention to the role of the eleté, scholars and the institutes concerned with huminities activities.

In the field of the philosophy of science, the process of knowledge development is based on three approaches, i.e. inductive, falsificationist, and paradigmatic. Despite their differences in their ontology, epistemology, and methodology, they all share in their relativistic approach to human understanding and knowledge. The authors in this article begin with introducing the three aforementioned approaches and their foundations. Then they turn to an Islamic approach towards the development of knowledge. The authors suggest a methodology they call “intermediate ijtihād” in which all four causes (efficient, material, formal, and final causes) are taken into account, and therefore culminate in rational certainty and religious authority. In this approach, the acquaintance with reality is possible through reason and authentic religious narratives, reality is not considered relative, and the basic principles of understanding will not change during time and in different places. It is also based on Divine worldview, and a cooperation of philosophy and science serves as an instrument, compensating for the shortcomings of modern sciences.