جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « جرم انگاری ابهام زا » در نشریات گروه « فقه و حقوق »

to emphasize the necessity of selectivity, which can provide minimal or Criminalization maximum in the area of different crimes. The important point in this regard is that the provision of any kind of crime is based on the internal capacity of the criminal law. Hence, in this article, with emphasis on the threefold criminal elements of the law (ambiguous legislation, new criminal offenses, and the reduction of legislative constraints), material (development in the subject, victim and criminal offender, absolute criminalization, and introductory and Also, independent crime) and psychological (criminalization with unwillingness, the development of unintentional crimes and the criminalization of criminal thought) .The criminalization of maximum offenses are presented with various examples in Iranian law. Strategies that demonstrate the establishment of a suppressive and security policy for Iran's legislature in relation to security threats against public security, and in particular against political sovereignty. Nevertheless, Iran's criminal policy on the use of some solutions, such as deprivation of crime, independently, the application of minimum constraints in legal texts, and criminalization with a general unwillingness to show a low degree of reluctance.

Increasing punishment is the main strategy which has been applied by governments against growth of serious crimes. Evolution of criminal law with regard to such serious crimes as crimes against security and public order in recent decades shows that strategies has been taken by States in making coercive criminal policy in this regard. The strategies focus on the internal capacities of criminal law when fighting against such categories of crimes. This paper sheds lights on the strategies relating to triple elements of crimes which widen the scope of criminalizing and a major part of research has been devoted to it. Thus the solution such as using certain terms and connecting it to the scope of criminalization, clauses with limited scope, ambiguous and controversial terms, changing the subject matter of the crimes, objective without considering the result, criminalization by general malicious intent as well as accepting unintentional crimes in this regard. Noting the solution can attract the attentions to the capacities of criminal law and reduces the importance of increasing punishment as a way of dealing with serious crimes