تولید علم

The aim of this study was to identify the experiences and perceptions of faculty members about the concept of research. The approach of interpretive research and its strategy was phenomenology and the field of research of Kurdistan, Hamedan, Kermanshah and Ilam universities. The sample size reached 15 people using semi-structured interview tools and with maximum diversity according to the criterion of theoretical saturation, which were selected by purposive sampling method and data were collected and by means of harmonization method. Data validation verified. Data analysis was performed with a descriptive-analytical approach using coding at both open and axial levels with the help of MAXQDA software. The results include four basic concepts and categories of research as a technical act, research as an individual action, research as a social action and research as a value. Each category has sub-components. Achieving all-round development and progress is not possible without proper use of research findings, so decision-making in decision-making systems requires that a suitable environment for the growth and development of researchers is a priority

This research begins with discussions in the field of “Methodology of Science”; and then it is followed up by proposing topics in the field of “epistemology of science” and finally, it tries to provide a research division for students of different educational levels based on them. Although the audience of this research is social science students; But it is also relevant for other fields of humanities. Acknowledging that some of the researches of Iranian students are considered to be of its top type; at the same time, we are of the opinion that most of them are not within the framework of a scientific work - in the sense that is intended by this article. We consider the reason for this deviation from scientific criteria to be their inability to reach the “expected problem”.Theoretical framework: the current research is data-based and therefore lacks a specific theoretical framework; however, its main idea, on which our proposed division of labor is based, originates from Randall Collins' views on “scientific society”.

The proposed work division of this article is the result of a “systematic review” of 51 scientific research articles written by masters and doctoral students. In the framework of the aforementioned proposed division of labor, the “Hijab issue” section; And during the systematic review of the previous researches that have been done regarding hijab; Formulated.

By planning seven types of process to reach the problem; we have shown which triple education level is suitable for each student.

Considering the importance of knowledge sharing as the most important factor in the science production process, this study investigated the relationship between these two variables from viewpoints of faculty members of Knowledge and Information Science at public universities in Tehran.  This study was an applied and descriptive-correlation study. The statistical population consisted of 48 faculty members of Knowledge and Information Science of Tehranchr('39')s public universities in 2019. Data gathering tools were two researcher-made questionnaires included: “knowledge sharing” with 23 questions in 5 dimensions and “science production” with 15 questions. Cronbachchr('39')s alpha method was used to measure the internal consistency reliability of the items that was 0.873 for “Knowledge Sharing Questionnaire”, and 0.854 for “Science Production Questionnaire". SPSS software version 23 was used for data analysis. The results showed that there is a positive and significant relationship among “knowledge sharing” and “science production” (p<0.001). Also, there was a strong and significant relationship between "production of science" and dimensions of “research” acceleration, “facilitating the use of knowledge” research barriers reduction”, “clarification of knowledge gained” and “research development” (p<0.001). Linear regression analysis also showed the effect of knowledge sharing on the science production. The results of this study showed that the success of the science production process is in applying knowledge sharing, and the development of scientific productions requires the use of tools, methods, suitable planning and scientific interactions.

The life of academic systems depends on the creation, evolution and scientific development. There is inextricable link between the humanities and cultural factors. The production of this science has made it complicated and difficult. Therefore, The goal of this research, Analyzing and explaining cultural components Affecting Humanities Production at Islamic University Been and It has been confirmed by the mix- method.  Used In the qualitative part of the grounded theory and in the quantitative part of the survey method. The data were collected by in-depth interviews With 20 experts in qualitative part. The questionnaire was completed by 190 Faculty Member of Payame Noor University of Isfahan and Chahar Mahal Bakhtiari.The validity of the interview questions and the questionnaire was confirmed by the content, concurrent method. Reliability was estimated by coefficient of agreement (90.06) and Cronbach's alpha (0.89, respectively).founding shows the impact of three cultural components: structural, attitudinal, managerial also 55 sub-components on the production of the humanities at Islamic University. Then tested in the current state of higher education. The results of correlation matrix, coefficient of determination and F value showed overlap and high explanatory power of these three cultural subscales with the criterion variable. The cultural attitude component has the highest share with the three components of scientific, administrative and social attitude. The cultural management component has had the smallest share in explaining the humanities production variable at Islamic University.

In this article, the status of research in Iran has been evaluated with a focus on the field of engineering and especially mechanical engineering. To achieve this goal, the quantity and quality of research have been studied and compared with developed and developing countries. The number of scientific publications has been used as the main quantitative index. In order to assess the quality of research, qualitative indicators such as the number of citations, the ratio of citation per document, the h-index, the scientific conferences and the top researchers have been analyzed. The results indicate that the quantity of the publications is favorable. In terms of the quantity of publications in the field of mechanical engineering, Iran ranked 14th in the world, and the ranking of the country is suitable for the h-index, which is a qualitative indicator of scientific production, while looking at the other qualitative index, which refers to the number of citation per document, the rank of Iran among the other countries is not suitable. In this article, suggestions have been made to improve the quality of research.

Humanities has such a special position and validity in the present age, so that some experts believe that reaching development is beholden to paying attention to this arena. In other words, humanities reviews and studies the foundations of human society, and argues that achieving awareness and cognizance highly depend on giving importance to this branch of science in the society. Therefore, it can be argued that humanities are the embodiment of self-awareness in any society and the most important element of civilization and integration in the structure of state organizations. Therefore, determining the importance, position and role of humanities as the infrastructure and platform for other branches of science is one of the most important issues that should be paid attention to in the policy- making arena. It is believed that humanities have strategic nature and performance; in addition, they determine the required framework for other branches of science. In fact, humanities determine the ultimate goal of the community and direct other sciences; hence, in all countries all over the world, especially in developed communities, humanities compared with other branches of science are of higher importance and priority, because other branches of science are of applied and technical type, and can play their own role in the framework of humanities in an efficient and significant way. Therefore, making efforts and planning for qualitative development, improving the level and position of humanities with respect to its special position in modern societies, on one hand; and taking into consideration the Supreme Leader's emphasis on the issue of "humanities" and its associated problems on the other, seems to be essential. Therefore, the present research aims at reviewing the importance and position of humanities from the Supreme Leader's viewpoint. Throughout the article, we will be dealing with the question "How important is humanities in Iran, and how can it be improved"?