نظریه پردازی داده بنیاد

The Islamic city is one that embodies the principles and values of Islam, providing the conditions necessary for realizing an Islamic lifestyle. This embodiment manifests in various forms across different regions and climates. In this context, the fundamental Islamic principle that should be realized in the social life of Muslims and within the urban environment is the principle of justice. The primary aim of this research is to develop a scientific theory based on Islamic sources regarding social and spatial justice as one of the pillars of the Islamic city or the ideal city in Islam. This is approached through the production of indigenous and Islamic knowledge in urban management and planning, utilizing grounded theory methodology. Ultimately, this research seeks to contribute, however modestly, to the theoretical foundations of the Islamic-Iranian city, guiding the pursuit of an Islamic-Iranian model of progress. The findings of this research reveal significant foundations that provide a precise definition of social and spatial justice, elaborating on the dimensions of this concept—including principles, criteria, and consequences—within a conceptual model. This model offers a comprehensive explanation of the current state of injustice and the process of achieving social and spatial justice in society. For instance, based on the results of this research, the definition of social and spatial justice is the “entitlement” of citizens regarding the distribution of services and resources, achieved by “placing everything in its rightful position” based on principles of “equality,” “public benefit,” and “equal access” to “public rights,” while recognizing “inequality” in “acquired rights” in human settlements. Based on this definition and the reviewed sources, the principles of social and spatial justice include:Public benefit in public affairs, Equality in public law, Equal access to public services, Inequality in individual-social acquired rights. The criteria for social and spatial justice are: Membership, Need, Performance, Value of action, Time and place requirements.

Abstract Nowday, one of the most important problems that has taken the attention of architecture is the necessity of persistence and immortality in contemporary architecture. Many architectural works that are created may be confirmed at a particular time but will not end up to immortality works. Although in recent years, some of the conferences and meetings have examined the effects of immortal architecture in this regard, they have tried to find out how to create an immortal effect in the field of architecture. Nevertheless, the lack of a proper model of study and An examination of how to achieve sustainability and immortality (persistence forever) in architectural works is completely felt. Since Persistence in architecture can be examined from two perspectives: physical Persistence and Conceptual Persistence. The article is intended, by doing research on the "Conceptual Persistence" and how to achieve a practical solution to get out of this offer, In this way, it is possible to construct spaces that respond positively to the human's inner and spiritual needs at any time, and relate to a wide range of human beings. To explain the research problem, the method of Contextual Grounded Theory has been used. The findings of the research lead to the development of Conceptual persistence theory in the form of a coding pattern and writing of their relationships with each other. The results of the research are based on the fact that the use of common patterns of persistent works is a prerequisite for conceptual persistence in architecture, but not a sufficient condition. What works the common patterns alive is to make use of meaning and according to human nature in the form of mystery and symbol, which has an impact both on its culture and spirituality in the building.

Nowadays, planning is no more is considered as a scientific and technical profession or a governmental and state duty rather it is envisioned as a bridge connecting the planners to the institutional changes. In other words, the planning theory is not formed within social, economic and/or political considerations rather it is configured by the individuals in social situations with the objective of elaborating the current status and prescribing of more appropriate procedures and processes. The present study has been conducted with the objective of introducing the elaborative and prescriptive power of the structural-strategic programs on the institutionalism grounds for the enhancement of the capacity of their application in Iran’s urban planning system. To do so, grounded theory has been utilized as the study strategy. The data collection instruments of the present study are documentary and library research, interviews with the experts, managers and specialists and participatory observation in the study environment; the instruments are composed of two micro- and macro-levels. In the latter level, Iran’s urban planning system’s conditions and indicators are taken into account with a pervasive comprehensiveness; in the former level, the sample evaluation is carried out with the objective of investigating the local scales of urban planning and management in the development and civil planning of the city of Mashhad. Following these analyses, 159 concepts and 44 topics and 9 meta-topics were identified in relation to Iran’s urban planning system and structural-strategic planning under six titles using a coding method. Amongst the identified topics, institutionalism was selected in the structural-strategic plans as the pivotal issue and the paradigmatic model was delineated with an emphasis on the causal, background and intervening conditions and strategies and outcomes. Based on this analytical model, the structural-strategic planning provides the prerequisites for the development of the scales and various levels as the discourse framework and in respect to the social mobilization.