decision
در نشریات گروه پزشکی-
Introduction
In the ever-evolving healthcare landscape, nurses are at the forefront of patient care. Nurses’ procedural skills are the lifeblood of quality care. Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a useful game changer that can change how we approach nursing practice. This scoping review of reviews was conducted with the aim of determining the potential of AI in improving nurses’ clinical, educational, decision-making, informational, and research skills.
MethodsEight electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, ProQuest, Microsoft Academic, and OpenGrey) were searched to find all studies (peer-reviewed and grey literature) published up to September 2024 using the keywords AI, nursing skills, and related terms. The Google Scholar search engine was used to find relevant sources and complete the search coverage. Data collected from included studies on each role that AI could play in nurses' skills were analyzed using narrative methods.
Resultsfinally, thirty review studies were included. Accordingly, AI has a beneficial effect on six main themes (education, decision, clinical practice, research, information, and psychiatric nursing) and thirty-three subthemes.
ConclusionThe results of our study showed that AI plays a fundamental role in improving the clinical, educational, decision-making, informational, and research skills of nurses. The integration of AI technologies not only fosters better patient outcomes but also equips nurses with the tools necessary for continuous professional development and efficiency. Future research should continue to explore specific applications and address any barriers to implementation to fully realize the benefits AI can bring to the nursing profession.
Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, Nurse, Skills, Education, Decision, Clinical Practice -
مقدمه
پرستاری بزرگترین حرفه موجود در نظام سلامت می باشد که متاثر از فرایند سیاست گذاری مدیران بخش سلامت می باشد. با این وجود پرستاران نقش کم رنگی در سیاست گذاری خدمات پرستاری دارند. این مطالعه با هدف تبیین چالش های سیاست گذاری حرفه پرستاری در قالب یک مطالعه کیفی انجام شد.
مواد و روش هاپژوهش کیفی حاضر از نوع تحلیل محتوی بود. جامعه پژوهش شامل مدیران، اساتید و برنامه ریزان پرستاری بودند که به صورت مبتنی بر هدف انتخاب شدند. جهت جمع آوری اطلاعات و استخراج نظر مشارکت کنندگان، مصاحبه های نیمه ساختار یافته با آنان انجام شد. پس از پیاده سازی متن مصاحبه ها تجزیه تحلیل آنها با روش تحلیل محتوی قراردادی صورت گرفت.
یافته هادر این مطالعه 14 مصاحبه با تصمیم گیران ارشد پرستاری (10 نفر زن و 4 نفر مرد) انجام شد که متوسط سابقه مدیریت افراد 2/9 ± 3/4 سال بود. 11 نفر از آنها کارشناس و مابقی کارشناس ارشد بودند. پس از تحلیل داده ها در نهایت دو طبقه اصلی «چالش های برون سازمانی و چالش های درون سازمانی » به دست آمد.
بحث و نتیجه گیریاین مطالعه نشان داد چالش های عمده در سیاست گذاری حرفه پرستاری در دو طبقه اصلی فراسازمانی شامل سیاست های بالادستی معیوب و عدم درک اقتضایات حرفه توسط قانون گذاران و درون سازمانی شامل کمبود صلاحیت سیاست گذاران، تاثیر پذیری از سایر حرفه ها و ضعف در اجرای سیاست ها می باشد که جهت رفع این چالش ها اقدامات متناسب ضروری است.
کلید واژگان: سیاست گذاری، حرفه پرستاری، تصمیم سازیIntroductionNursing is the largest profession in the health system, which is influenced by the policy-making process of health managers. Nevertheless, nurses play a diminutive role in nursing profession policy. This study aimed to explain the challenges of nursing profession policy in the form of a qualitative study.
Materials and methodsThis qualitative research was content analysis. The research population consisted of managers, faculty members and nursing planners who were selected based on the goal. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with them to gather information and extract opinion from the participants. After the implementation of the interviews, their analysis was profession out using conventional content analysis method.
FindingsIn this study, 14 interviews with senior decision-makers (10 women and 4 men) were conducted, with a mean of 4,3 ± 9,2 years. 11 of them were experts and the rest were senior experts. After analyzing the data, ultimately, the two main categories were "meta-Organizational Challenges and In-Organizational Challenges."
ConclusionThis study showed that major challenges in nursing policy-making in the two main meta-organization categories included defective upstream policies and the lack of understanding of profession requirements by legislators, and within the organization, including the lack of policymakers, the impact of other professions And a weakness in the implementation of policies that are necessary to address these challenges of proportional measures.
Keywords: policy, nursing profession, decision -
BACKGROUND
The most important reasons for choosing cesarean include negative attitude of pregnant women toward natural childbirth, and it is not easy for many women to make a decision about the choice of delivery, Midwives as responsible individuals, play an important role in providing maternal counseling and care during pregnancy and childbirth and the postpartum period. This study was carried out to determine the effect of individual counseling on attitudes and decisional conflict in the choice of delivery among nulliparous women.
MATERIALS AND METHODSThis clinical trial was performed on 90 nulliparous women with 28–30 weeks of gestational age, who were referred to health‑care centers in Mashhad. They were divided randomly into intervention and control groups. The intervention group received the counseling program individually during three sessions, while the control group received routine care, childbirth attitudes, and decisional conflict on choice of delivery were compared on women of 34–36 weeks of pregnancy. Data collection tools included demographic details form, Childbirth Attitudes Scale and Decisional Conflict Scale; data were analyzed using Chi‑square tests, Fisher’s exact test, Mann–Whitney test, t‑test, parried t‑test, and ANCOVA in SPSS v. 16, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTSAfter consultation, there was a significant difference in attitude score between the intervention group (86.577 ± 13.531) and the control group (69.955 ± 19.858) (P < 0.001), And there was a significant difference in decisional conflict score between the intervention group (0.614 ± 0.626) and the control group (1.216 ± 0.949) (P < 0.001), and there were significant differences between the two groups in terms of preferred delivery (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONAccording to the results of this randomized control trial, individual counseling in nulliparous women during pregnancy leads to a positive attitude toward natural childbirth, informed decision‑making, and increase in the selection of natural childbirth.
Keywords: Attitude, childbirth, counseling, decision -
BACKGROUNDCurrently, becoming beautiful is a value among Iranian society, although experts have suggested several complications of cosmetic surgery, but decision to have these surgeries has been dramatically increased in recent years. This increase has imposed high workload and costs on the health care system of the country. This study was conducted to explore the reasons why people perform cosmetic surgery in an Iranian context.METHODSTwenty-one subjects from both sexes who were 22-52 year-old and had undergone face plastic surgery between 1-5 years ago were enrolled and semi-structured data was collected via open interviews, while qualitative content were analyzed utilizing conventional analysis methods. Data analysis considered the theme “my face, my destiny” which contained 2 subcategories of “obtaining a chance for a better life “and” obtaining acceptance in society”.RESULTSThe participants considered cosmetic surgery as a blessing from God that played a major role in their future, so they accepted the risks of the surgery.CONCLUSIONUnderstanding experiences of these individuals may help health care team particularly nurses to consult them and other individuals who might think about doing cosmetic surgery through education to help them make a better decision for to do cosmetic surgery.Keywords: Face, Destiny, Content analysis, Decision, Cosmetic surgery, Iran
-
BackgroundSelecting the appropriate method for analysis of accidents is an important phase in accident investigation, due to the varieties of factors affecting the selection process, varieties of accident analysis methods, and their specific strengths and weaknesses.ObjectivesThis study was carried out with aim of determining the important criteria that accident analysis methods should have and selecting the optimal method for analysis of accidents in the Iranian oil industry.MethodsThe fuzzy analytical network process (FANP) technique was used to address the relative importance of the evaluation criteria and sub-criteria (pair-wise comparisons of criteria was carried out by oil industry safety expert) for selecting accident analysis methods. Fuzzy TOPSIS (technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution) were used for accident analysis methods prioritizing and ranking (methods was scored by occupational health post-graduate students).ResultsResults indicated that the multiple levels cause identification capability and provides solution are the most and least important criteria in comparison with the other criteria for selecting accident analysis method, respectively. Based on the studied criteria, it was concluded that tripod beta (CCi = 0.303) can be used as an optimal method for accident analysis in oil industry.ConclusionsThe present study found that Tripod beta has a greater ability to analyze oil industry accidents compared with the other methods under consideration. However, it has limitations, which can be addressed by other methods.Keywords: Accident, Decision, Oil
-
This study was done to investigate female heads of households decision-making process for remarriage and its barriers. Since an important part of these womens life was not researchable through questionnaires and details of their life would be omitted, it's felt the need to do qualitative work; therefore, it's a qualitative study by narrative analysis strategy in which we used both thematic analysis and structural analysis by using semi-structured interviews with 9 women in Gonabad. The results of this study showed these persons strongly felt the lack of husband due to the variety of needs, but barriers to remarriage have a deterrent role in the final decision to remarriage and this structural pressure is to the extent that put women in conflict for making final decision and this conflict will increase over time. In the final, 9 of them had feeling the need, tending to remarry, social perceptions, expectations originated from emotions, expectations originated from position, subjective norms and evaluating and expecting benefits.Keywords: Decision, Making, Remarriage, Narrative, Thematic
-
In their 2017 article, Mannion and Exworthy provide a thoughtful and theory-based analysis of two parallel trends in modern healthcare systems and their competing and conflicting logics: standardization and customization. This commentary further discusses the challenge of treatment decision-making in times of evidence-based medicine (EBM), shared decision-making and personalized medicine. From the perspective of systems theory, we propose the concept of individualized standardization as a solution to the problem. According to this concept, standardization is conceptualized as a guiding framework leaving room for individualization in the patient physician interaction. The theoretical background is the concept of context management according to systems theory. Moreover, the comment suggests multidisciplinary teams as a possible solution for the integration of standardization and individualization, using the example of multidisciplinary tumor conferences and highlighting its limitations. The comment also supports the authors statement of the patient as co-producer and introduces the idea that the competing logics of standardization and individualization are a matter of perspective on macro, meso and micro levels.Keywords: Standardization, Customization, Individualization, Guidelines, Decision, making, Tumor, Conferences
-
Context: Disasters are increasing worldwide, with more devastating effects than ever before. Hospitals must maintain their normal functions or have an evacuation plan due to the rate of damages at the time of a sudden disaster. The present study was conducted to determine the effective determinants and components in hospital evacuation decision- making.
Evidence Acquisition: In this systematic review study, which was conducted in 2016, bibliographies, citation databases, and other available records such as international guidelines, documents and reports of organizations and academic dissertations were used to find an answer to the following question: What are the effective components in hospital evacuation decision- making? Finally, 34 articles were included in this systematic review. This systematic review article was checked with PRISMA checklist.ResultsThe common factors affecting hospital emergency evacuation decision-making were classified into 4 general categories and 40 subcategories, which have been explored during thematic analysis. These 4 categories included hospital infrastructure consequences, threat, internal factors, and external factors. Level of risk was the most important component of threat category and it was mentioned in most of the reviewed literature. Loss of electricity and water, communication and transportation, resources such as staff, and removing patient devices were the most mentioned factors in hospital infrastructure consequences, external factors, and internal factors, respectively.ConclusionsDifferent variables affect the process of hospital emergency evacuation decision-making. Thus, further studies are needed to develop a decision-making tool for hospital emergency evacuations in Iran.Keywords: Hospital Evacuation, Decision, Making, Disasters, Emergencies -
زمینه و هدفامروزه نقش تبلیغات شفاهی در اتخاذ تصمیمات به ویژه در بخش خدمات از اهمیت خاصی برخوردار است. از این رو، هدف از این مطالعه بررسی تاثیر تبلیغات شفاهی بر رفتار تصمیم گیری زنان باردار جهت عضویت در بانک خون بند ناف رویان بوده است.مواد و روش هااین مطالعه از نظر هدف، کاربردی است و ماهیتی علی دارد. جامعه آماری این پژوهش 790 نفر از زنان باردار عضو بانک خون بند ناف رویان در شهر اراک می باشد که از این تعداد 294 نمونه به روش نمونه گیری غیر تصادفی در دسترس انتخاب شدند. داده های پژوهش به کمک پرسش نامه گردآوری گردید. تجزیه و تحلیل داده ها به روش مدل یابی معادلات ساختاری(SEM) و با استفاده از نرم افزار لیزرل نسخه 54/8 صورت گرفت.یافته هایافته ها نشان داد که تاثیر متغیر رسانه ارتباطی بر منبع اطلاعات شخصی و تبلیغات شفاهی معنی دار و مثبت است. به علاوه، تاثیر رهبران عقیده بر منبع اطلاعات شخصی و تبلیغات شفاهی معنی دار و مثبت بود و تاثیر معنی دار و منفی این متغیر بر ریسک ادراک شده مشهود گشت. منبع اطلاعات شخصی تاثیر معنی دار و مثبتی بر تصمیم گیری داشت. با این وجود، ساختار اجتماعی از هیچ گونه تاثیری بر تبلیغات شفاهی برخوردار نبود، عدم تاثیر تبلیغات شفاهی بر تصمیم گیری نیز از یافته های دیگر پژوهش بود.نتیجه گیریبا توجه به نتایج به نظر می رسد توجه به پیش نیازها و شرایط لازم جهت فراهم آوردن بستری مناسب برای ایجاد و گسترش تبلیغات شفاهی تاثیرگذار جهت تصمیم گیری برای پیوستن به بانک خون بند ناف رویان امری ضروری است.کلید واژگان: تبلیغات شفاهی، تصمیم گیری، مدل یابی معادلات ساختاریBackgroundToday, the role of word of mouth (WOM) in making decision particularly in service sector became important. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the effect of word of mouth on pregnant woman decision-making behavior to join the Royan Cord Blood Bank.Materials And MethodsThe research is operational and has a causal nature. The population of study was 790 pregnant women enrolled in Royan Cord Blood Bank in Arak city that 294 subjects were selected by available non-random sampling method. To collect data, questionnaire instrument was used. Data were analyzed according to Structural Equations Modeling (SEM) by LISREL (version 8.54) software.ResultsThe results of the study revealed that the effect of communication medium on personal information source and word of mouth was significant and positive. In addition, opinion leaders had a significant and positive influence on personal information source and word of mouth and also, the significant and negative effect of opinion leaders on perceived risk was seen. Personal information source had a significant and positive effect on decision-making. However, social structure didnt have any effect on word of mouth. Likewise, word of mouth didnt influence decision-making.ConclusionAccording to the findings of the research, it seems that paying attention to the prerequisites and conditions making a suitable bed for creating effective word of mouth and expanding it to making decision for joining the Royan Cord Blood Bank is very necessary.Keywords: Word of mouth, Decision, making, Structural equations modeling
-
Decentralisation has been described as an empty concept that lacks clarity. Yet there is an enduring interest in the process of decentralisation within health systems and public services more generally. Many claims about the benefits of decentralisation are not supported by evidence. It may be useful as an organising framework for analysis of health systems but in this context it lacks conceptual clarity and particularly often ignores level context issues given the focus on a principal-agent/vertical centre/local axis or other aspects of limits on autonomy such as standards for professional practice. Both these aspects are relevant in discussing the establishment of decentralised health centres in Fiji. In the end decentralisation may be nothing more than a useful descriptive label that can be used in an increasingly wide range of ways but actually have little meaning in practice as an analytical concept.Keywords: Decentralisation, Decision Space, Organisational Interdependence, Centralisation, Decision, Making, Autonomy
-
The aim of the current review wasto study the existing knowledge about decision-making and to identify and describe validated training tools.A comprehensive literature review was conducted by using the following keywords: decision-making, emergencies, disasters, crisis management, training, exercises, simulation, validated, real-time, command and control, communication, collaboration, and multi-disciplinary in combination or as an isolated word. Two validated training systems developed in Sweden, 3 level collaboration (3LC) and MacSim, were identified and studied in light of the literature review in order to identify how decision-making can be trained. The training models fulfilled six of the eight identified characteristics of training for decision-making.Based on the results, these training models contained methods suitable to train for decision-making.Keywords: Decision, making, Emergencies, Disasters, Crisis management, Training, Exercises, Simulation, Validated, Real, time, Command, control, Communication, Collaboration, Multi, disciplinary
-
Priority setting of health interventions is generally considered as a valuable approach to support low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) in their strive for universal health coverage (UHC). However, present initiatives on priority setting are mainly geared towards the development of more cost-effectiveness information, and this evidence does not sufficiently support countries to make optimal choices. The reason is that priority setting is in reality a value-laden political process in which multiple criteria beyond cost-effectiveness are important, and stakeholders often justifiably disagree about the relative importance of these criteria. Here, we propose the use of evidence-informed deliberative processes as an approach that does explicitly recognise priority setting as a political process and an intrinsically complex task. In these processes, deliberation between stakeholders is crucial to identify, reflect and learn about the meaning and importance of values, informed by evidence on these values. Such processes then result in the use of a broader range of explicit criteria that can be seen as the product of both international learning (core criteria, which include eg, cost-effectiveness, priority to the worse off, and financial protection) and learning among local stakeholders (contextual criteria). We believe that, with these evidence-informed deliberative processes in place, priority setting can provide a more meaningful contribution to achieving UHC.Keywords: Universal Health Coverage (UHC), Priority Setting, Cost, Effectiveness Analysis, Evidence, Informed Deliberative Processes, Decision, Making, Legitimacy
-
International Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine، سال چهاردهم شماره 9 (پیاپی 80، Sep 2016)، صص 589 -596مقدمه
عواملی که قصد فرزندآوری مردان را تحت تاثیر قرار می دهد در متون نسبتا ناشناخته است.
هدفاین مطالعه با هدف تعیین عوامل موثر بر تصمیم درباره زمان اولین فرزندآوری مردان انجام شد.
مواد و روش هادر مطالعه مقطعی حاضر، 300 مرد مراجعه کننده به مراکز دولتی و خصوصی منتخب شهر شاهرود از فروردین تا شهریور 1393به صورت تصادفی مورد بررسی قرار گرفتند. داده ها با استفاده از پرسش نامه های مشخصات دموگرافیک، کیفیت زندگی، شاخص رضایت زناشویی انریچ، امید به زندگی اشنایدر و مقیاس حمایت اجتماعی ادراک شده چند بعدی جمع آوری شد.
نتایجپس از حذف مسیرهایی که به لحاظ آماری معنی دار نبودند، سن ازدواج در مردان بیشترین اثرمستقیم (86/0=β) را بر تصمیم گیری اولین فرزندآوری در مردان داشت. رضایت زناشویی (09/0-=β) ، حمایت اجتماعی (06/0=β)، وضعیت اقتصادی (06/0=β) و کیفیت زندگی (08/0-=β) از دیگر متغیرهای تاثیرگذار بر تصمیم گیری اولین فرزندآوری در مردان می باشد. بعلاوه رضایت زناشویی و حمایت اجتماعی اثر غیرمستقیم معنی داری بر تصمیم گیری اولین فرزندآوری داشت (به ترتیب 04/0-=β و 01/0-=β).
نتیجه گیریعوامل بسیاری شامل عوامل فردی (سن ازدواج و کیفیت زندگی)، عوامل خانوادگی (رضایت زناشویی) و همچنین عوامل اجتماعی (حمایت اجتماعی) می تواند بر تصمیم فرزندآوری مردان تاثیرگذار باشد. تیم سلامت و سیاست گذاران باید راهکارهایی بیاندیشند تا ضمن تسهیل شرایط اجتماعی- اقتصادی و خانوادگی مناسب، زوجین بتوانند در زمان مناسبی تعداد فرزندانی را که می خواهند تحقق بخشند.
کلید واژگان: فرزندآوری، تصمیم گیری، عوامل موثر پدری، مردانBackgroundFactors that influence mens childbearing intentions have been relatively unexplored in the literature.
ObjectiveThis study aimed to determine the influencing factors about the first childbearing timing decisions of men.
Materials And MethodsIn this cross-sectional study, 300 men who were referred to private and governmental healthcare centers in Shahrood, Iran were randomly recruited from April to September 2014. Data were collected using a demographic questionnaire, the Quality of Life Questionnaire; ENRICH Marital Satisfaction Questionnaire, Synders Hope Scale, and the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support.
ResultsAfter removing the statistically insignificant paths, mens age at marriage had the highest direct effect (β=0.86) on their first childbearing decision. Marital satisfaction (β=-0.09), social support (β=0.06), economic status (β=0.06), and quality of life (β=-0.08) were other effective factors on mens first childbearing decisions. Moreover, marital satisfaction and social support had significant indirect effects on mens childbearing decisions (β=-0.04 and -0.01, respectively).
ConclusionMany factors, including personal factors (age at marriage and quality of life), family factors (marital satisfaction), and social factors (social support), can affect mens decision to have a child. Policymakers are hence required to develop strategies to promote the socioeconomic and family conditions of the couples and to encourage them to have as many children as they desire at an appropriate time.
Keywords: Childbearing, Decision, making, Influencing factors, Paternal, Men -
رضایت آگاهانه و حق تصمیم گیری بیمار درباره مراقبت های پزشکی خود، بر پایه اصل احترام به خودمختاری، از جمله مهم ترین مباحث اخلاق پزشکی است که ریشه در فلسفه اخلاقی لیبرالیسم دارد. در افراد فاقد ظرفیت، تصمیم گیری توسط فرد جایگزین صورت می پذیرد. این فرایند شامل سه بخش انتخاب فرد جایگزین، نحوه تصمیم گیری و ملاک های آن است، که اگر بر اساس مبانی اندیشه لیبرالیسم پایه ریزی شود، با چالش هایی مواجه خواهد شد، به طوری که راه برون رفت از آن را می بایست در سایر نظام های فلسفی جستجو کرد. از این رو مطالعه روایتی حاضر که به روش کتابخانه ای و تحلیل مبانی معرفتی انجام شده است، سعی دارد تا ضمن بیان خاستگاه های معرفتی تفکر اخلاقی لیبرالیسم و اصل احترام به خودمختاری، فرایند تصمیم گیری جایگزین بر پایه مبانی نظری لیبرالیسم را مورد تحلیل و نقد قرار دهد. بنابراین می توان نتیجه گرفت که اخلاق پزشکی مبتنی بر اندیشه ها و اصول لیبرالیسم، اگرچه به گونه ای ساختاریافته طراحی شده است و راه گشای برخی از مسائل مربوط به تصمیم گیری های اخلاقی در پزشکی است، اما با این حال می تواند با چالش های جدی مواجه گردد.کلید واژگان: لیبرالیسم، اخلاق پزشکی، خودمختاری، تصمیم گیری، جانشینیThe right of patients to make decisions about their medical care, based on informed consent rule and the principle of respect for autonomy rooted from philosophy of liberalism. Patients with capacity are responsible for decision-making, but in those lacking capacity, a surrogate decision maker is needed. This process consisted of three parts: choosing surrogate decision maker, how to make decision and its criteria, if they founded on the intellectual foundations of liberalism, will faced with the challenges, so, must be sought the its solution ways in other philosophical systems. This narrative research tries to analyze and criticize the process of surrogacy decision making based on theoretical essentials of liberalism, meanwhile descript epistemic sources of liberalism. In conclusion, although, medical ethics based on liberalism principles has been designed in a structured manner and can resolve some problems of ethical decisions in medicine, could be however faced with serious challenges.Keywords: Liberalism, Medical Ethics, Autonomy, Surrogate, Decision, Making
-
Although the importance of patient participation in the design and evaluation of health programs and services is well-documented, there is scarcity of research with regard to patient association (PA) participation in health policy decision-making processes. To this end, the present study aimed to validate further a previously developed instrument as well as to investigate the degree of PA participation in health policy decision-making in Cyprus. A convenient sample of 114 patients-members of patients associations took part in the study. Participants were recruited from an umbrella organization, the Pancyprian Federation of Patient Associations and Friends (PFPA). PA participation in health policy decision-making was assessed with the Health Democracy Index (HDI), an original 8-item tool. To explore its psychometric properties, Cronbach α was computed as regards to its internal consistency, while its convergent validity was tested against a self-rated question enquiring about the degree of PA participation in health policy decision-making. The findings revealed that the HDI has good internal consistency and convergent validity. Furthermore, PAs were found to participate more in consultations in health-related organizations and the Ministry of Health (MoH) as well as in reforms or crucial decisions in health policy. Lower levels were documented with regard to participation in hospital boards, ethics committees in clinical trials and health technology assessment (HTA) procedures. Overall, PA participation levels were found to be lower than the mid-point of the scale. Targeted interventions aiming to facilitate patients involvement in health policy decision-making processes and to increase its impact are greatly needed in Cyprus.Keywords: Patient Participation, Health Policy, Decision, Making
-
Governance in health is cited as one of the key factors in balancing the concerns of the government and public sector with the interests of civil society/private players, but often remains poorly described and operationalized. Richard Saltman and Antonio Duran look at two aspects in the search for new provider models in a context of health markets signalling liberalisation: (i) the role of the government to balance public and private interests and responsibilities in delivering care through modernised governance arrangements, and (ii) the finding that operational complexities may hinder welldesigned provider governance models, unless governance reflects country-specific realities. This commentary builds on the discussion by Saltman and Duran, and argues that the concept of governance needs to be clearly defined and operationalized in order to be helpful for policy debate as well as for the development of an applicable framework for performance improvement. It provides a working definition of governance and includes a reflection on the prevailing cultural norms in an organization or society upon which any governance needs to be build. It proposes to explore whether the evidence-based governance concept can be introduced to generate knowledge about innovative and effective governance models, and concludes that studies similar to the one by Saltman and Duran can inform this debate.Keywords: Governance, Evidence, Operationalization, Decision, Making
-
با توجه به تغییرات ایجاد شده در سازمان های مراقبتی، پرستاران مجبورند به معضلات اخلاقی بیش تر و پیچیده تری رسیدگی کنند که برای حل معضلات اخلاقی باید با روند تصمیم گیری اخلاقی آشنا باشند. لازمه ی تصمیم گیری اخلاقی برخورداری از توانایی استدلال اخلاقی است. مطالعه ی کنونی با هدف تعیین رابطه ی نمره ی استدلال اخلاقی با ویژگی های فردی و حرفه ای پرستاران؛ در یکی از بیمارستان های فوق تخصصی شهر تهران در سال 1394 انجام شده است.
در این مطالعه ی توصیفی - تحلیلی، کلیه ی پرستاران واجد شرایط جامعه ی پژوهش به روش سرشماری به تعداد 245 نفر شرکت کردند. جهت جمع آوری داده ها از پرسشنامه ی جمعیت شناختی و آزمون معضلات اخلاقی Crisham استفاده شد. برای تحلیل داده ها از آزمون های آماری توصیفی – تحلیلی و نرم افزار SPSS نسخه ی 22 استفاده شد. نتایج این مطالعه نشان می دهد که میانگین نمره ی استدلال اخلاقی پرستاران 72/6±81/40 است که پایین تر از نمره ی متوسط آزمون است، با افزایش سابقه ی کاری، میانگین نمره ی استدلال اخلاقی کاهش می یابد (05/0P≤) و مجردها نسبت به متاهل ها از میانگین نمره ی استدلال اخلاقی بیش تری برخوردارند (50/0P≤) و بین سایر ویژگی های جمعیت شناختی با نمره ی استدلال اخلاقی رابطه ی معنی داری مشاهده نشد. با توجه به پایین بودن توانایی استدلال اخلاقی پرستاران در این مطالعه، پیشنهاد می شود در مطالعات آتی در خصوص روش های ارتقای توانمندی تصمیم گیری اخلاقی پرستاران راه کارهای مناسب آموزشی شناسایی شود و به منظور جلوگیری از کاهش توانایی استدلال اخلاقی با افزایش سابقه ی کار ضروری است که علت شناسایی شود و متناسب با علل، راه کارهایی برای کمک به مدیران پرستاری و کمیته ی اخلاق بیمارستانی به کار رود.کلید واژگان: تصمیم گیری اخلاقی، استدلال اخلاقی، اخلاق پرستاری، پرستارانAs a result of the changes made in health care systems, nurses nowadays are faced with more complicated ethical dilemmas. Therefore, they need to be familiar with ethical decision-making procedures and have the ability to perform ethical reasoning. The present study aimed to evaluate this ability in nurses and investigate its relationship with demographic characteristics in a subspecialized hospital in Tehran during 2015. This was a descriptive-analytical study, and the research population consisted of 245 qualified nurses selected by census. A demographic questionnaire and Crishams Nursing Dilemma Test were used to collect the data. Descriptive-analytical tests and SPSS software version 22 were used for data analysis. Based on the, the mean value of the nurses ethical reasoning was 40.81 ± 6.72, which is lower than the average score of the test. Furthermore, increased work experience led to a reduction in the mean value of ethical reasoning (P ≤ 0.05). Overall, single subjects scored higher in the mean ethical reasoning than those who were married (P ≤ 0.05), but no significant relationship was observed between other demographic characteristics and the mean of ethical reasoning. Due to the nurses low ability to perform ethical reasoning, further studies will need to be conducted on proper training methods to promote ethical decision-making in nurses. As regards the reduced ethical reasoning ability in nurses with more work experience, it is necessary to identify the reasons and devise appropriate solutions with the help of nursing managers and hospital ethics committees.
Keywords: decision, making, ethical reasoning, nursing ethics -
سابقه و هدفتصمیم گیری پرخطر یکی از نقص های محوری در اختلال نارسایی توجه/بیش فعالی است. عوامل متعددی برای نقص در تصمیم گیری افراد مبتلا به این اختلال وجود دارد که از جمله آنها نقص در عملکرد های اجرایی از جمله حافظه کاری است. هدف از مطالعه حاضر نشان دادن رابطه بین حافظه کاری و تصمیم گیری پرخطر در کودکان مبتلا به اختلال نارسایی توجه/بیش فعالی است.مواد و روش هادر مطالعه مقطعی حاضر، نمونه گیری به شیوه در دسترس و شامل 45 نفر (19 دختر و 26 پسر) از کودکان مبتلا به اختلال نقص توجه/بیش فعالی بود که از طرف روانپزشکان ارجاع داده شده بودند. کودکانی که طبق تشخیص روانپزشکان اختلالات همراه داشتند از مطالعه کنار گذاشته شدند. عملکرد حافظه کاری با استفاده از تکلیف چند محرک پیشین (ان بک) و تصمیم گیری پرخطر با آزمون خطرپذیری بادکنکی (بارت) در کلینیک توانبخشی شناختی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفت.نتایجسه زیرمتغیر آزمون خطرپذیری همبستگی معنی دار با نمره دقت حافظه کاری داشتند (P<0/01) و نتایج تحلیل رگرسیون نشان داد که می توان با در دست داشتن نمره دقت حافظه کاری، نمره تنظیم شده آزمون خطرپذیری که اصلی ترین نمره این آزمون است پیش بینی کرد (P<0/01).نتیجه گیریبا کاهش ظرفیت حافظه کاری، خطرپذیری آزمودنی ها افزایش پیدا می کند و می توان با کمک نمره دقت حافظه کاری، خطرپذیری را در این کودکان پیش بینی کرد. به عبارت دیگر، پس از بالا بردن ظرفیت حافظه کاری، خطرپذیری در این کودکان کاهش می یابد.
کلید واژگان: حافظه کاری، عملکردهای اجرایی، اختلال نارسایی توجه، بیش فعالی، تصمیم گیریFeyz, Volume:19 Issue: 6, 2016, PP 504 -510BackgroundRisky decision-making can be considered as one of the main deficits in attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). There are various factors that lead to decision-making deficit in children with ADHD, including deficit in working memory as a component of executive functions. This study aimed to examine the relationship between working memory and risky decision-making in children with ADHD.Materials And MethodsIn this cross-sectional study, 45 children (19 girls and 26 boys) with ADHD were selected using the non-probability sampling method. Children with comorbid disorders were excluded from the study. The N-Back test and the balloon analogue risk task (BARAT) were used to evaluate working memory and risky decision-making, respectively.ResultsThe results of Pearson correlation showed that working memory was correlated with risky decision-making (P<0.01). Moreover, the results of step-wise regressions showed the predictive role of working memory in risky decision-making of the participants (P<0.01).ConclusionResults of this study show that working memory is negatively correlated with risky decision-making. Also, working memory scores can predict risky decision-making in children with ADHD. Therefore, it can be concluded that risk-taking will be reduced by improving working memory.Keywords: Working memory, Executive function, Attention deficit, hyperactivity disorder, Decision, making -
BackgroundAccording to general ethical and legal principles, valid consent must be obtained before starting any procedure..ObjectivesDue to the lack of a standard tool for assessing patients’ capacity to consent to medical treatment in Iran, the present study was carried out aiming to devise a Persian version of a cross-cultural adaptation of the MacArthur competence assessment tool..Patients andMethodsBy reviewing different methods of cultural translation and adaptation for assessment tools, and due to the lack of consensus on its processes, we selected Wild’s model as one of the most comprehensive methods in this regard. Wild’s (2005) 10-stage model includes preparation, forward translation, reconciliation of the forward translation, back translation of reconciliation, back translation review, cognitive debriefing and cognitive review, and finalization, proofreading and final reporting. Using this model, we translated the MacArthur assessment tool and made it adaptable to Iranian patients..ResultsThe MacArthur assessment tool is not dependent on any specific culture and language. As a result, if translation and its scientific adaptation are done based on an integrated and detailed model, the tool can be used for every culture and language. In other words, this tool is not culture-specific; so, it is applicable in cases where a translation is needed, and it can be culturally adapted to suit different societies..ConclusionsIn the present study, we are able to focus on and prove the efficacy and benefits of this measurement tool..Keywords: Decision, Making Capacity, Competency, Assessment Tools for Treatment, Translation, Cross, Cultural Adaptation, Macarthur Assessment Tool
-
مقدمهتصمیم گیری یکی از مفاهیم اصلی پرستاری است که بر کیفیت مراقبت از بیمار تاثیر مستقیم دارد. آگاهی از ارتباط بین سبک تصمیم گیری با صلاحیت بالینی پیش نیاز طراحی برنامه های آموزشی مناسب جهت ارتقاء سطح تخصص پرستاران است، با عنایت به کمبود اطلاعات در این زمینه، مطالعه حاضر با هدف تعیین همبستگی بین سبک تصمیم گیری عمومی با صلاحیت بالینی در پرستاران انجام گردید.روشاین مطالعه به صورت همبستگی در سال 1393 انجام شد نمونه ها شامل 204 نفر از پرستاران شاغل در بیمارستانهای آموزشی کرمانشاه بودند که به صورت تصادفی طبقه ای وارد مطالعه شدند، ابزار جمع آوری داده ها شامل پرسشنامه های صلاحیت بالینی بنر و سبک تصمیم گیری اسکات و بروس بودند. داده ها با مراجعه به محل کار نمونه ها و تکمیل پرسشنامه ها جمع آوری شدند، سپس با استفاده از نرم افزار SPSS 16 و آمار توصیفی و استنباطی مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفتند.یافته هامیانگین و انحراف معیار نمره صلاحیت بالینی کل برابر با 74/ 10±56/ 69 بود، نمره سبک تصمیم گیری عقلایی (07/ 3 ±97/ 17) و سبک تصمیم گیری شهودی (43/ 3 ±95/ 17) از سایر سبک ها بیشتر بودند. آزمون همبستگی نشان داد که بین سبک تصمیم گیری عقلایی (r=0.209 P=0.003) و شهودی (r=0.193 P=0.006) با صلاحیت بالینی ارتباط معنادار مثبتی وجود دارد.نتیجه گیریدر مطالعه حاضر ارتباط معناداری بین سبک های تصمیم گیری شهودی و عقلایی با صلاحیت بالینی در پرستاران یافت شد، لذا توصیه می شود برنامه های آموزشی مناسب برای تقویت این سبک های تصمیم گیری در دانشجویان و کارکنان پرستاری جهت افزایش سطح صلاحیت بالینی آنها طراحی شود.
کلید واژگان: تصمیم گیری، صلاحیت بالینی، پرستارانIntroductionDecision-making is the main concept in nursing, having a direct effect on nursing care. Awareness of the relationship between decision-making style and nursing clinical competence is a prerequisite for establishing proper educative programs over developing the nurses’ expertise. The current study was conducted to determine the correlation between general decision-making style and clinical competence of nurses.MethodsIn this correctional research, 204 nurses working in the educational hospitals in Kermanshah enrolled in the study using a stratified random method in 2014. The tools included clinical competence of Benner and Scott and Bruce decision-making styles questioners. Data were collected from work location of the participants and completing the questioners. Then they were analyzed using SPSS version 16 and descriptive and inferential statistics.FindingsMean and standard deviation of total clinical competence was 69.56± 10.74. The mean number of rational decision- making (17.97± 3.07) and intuitive decision-making (17.95± 3.43) styles was higher than other styles. There was a significant positive correlation between rational (r=0.209 P=0.003) and intuitive (r=0.193 P=0.006) decision- making styles with clinical competence.ConclusionThere was a positive relationship between rational and intuitive decision- making styles with clinical competence. Consequently, an appropriate educational program should be designed to strengthen the clinical competency of nurses and nursing students.Keywords: decision, making, clinical competence, nurses
- نتایج بر اساس تاریخ انتشار مرتب شدهاند.
- کلیدواژه مورد نظر شما تنها در فیلد کلیدواژگان مقالات جستجو شدهاست. به منظور حذف نتایج غیر مرتبط، جستجو تنها در مقالات مجلاتی انجام شده که با مجله ماخذ هم موضوع هستند.
- در صورتی که میخواهید جستجو را در همه موضوعات و با شرایط دیگر تکرار کنید به صفحه جستجوی پیشرفته مجلات مراجعه کنید.