reliability
در نشریات گروه پزشکی-
Background
Recently, some theories and research have introduced another type of envy, which includes both the positive (benign) and negative (malicious) aspects of envy. It seems that primarily the malicious dimension of envy is the subject of much existing research. Therefore, a scale that can measure another dimension of envy, such as malicious envy, can be an attractive measure for research in this field.
ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to validate and investigate the psychometric properties of the Iranian version of the Benign and Malicious Envy Scale (BeMaS).
MethodsThe current research is of a descriptive-correlation type. A total of 429 people (138 males and 291 females) participated in the study. The participants answered the questions of the Sociodemographic Questionnaire, BeMaS, Performance Failure Appraisal Inventory (PFAI), and achievement motivation test (AMT). The obtained data were analyzed using SPSS and AMOS version 22 software. This study was conducted in 2021, and the questionnaires were designed and distributed online using the Porsline platform.
ResultsThe results of the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) support the two components of envy based on the original version (GFI = 0.95, CFI = 0.92, RMSEA = 0.08). The results showed a statistically significant value (P < 0.001) with χ² (df) values of 87.32. A significant relationship was observed between benign envy and achievement motivation (r = 0.18, P < 0.01), but no significant relationship was observed with fear of failure (r = 0.09, P > 0.01). Unlike benign envy, malicious envy has a moderate significant positive relationship with fear of failure (r = 0.35, P < 0.01) and a significant negative correlation with achievement motivation (r = -0.28, P < 0.01). The Cronbach’s alpha for benign envy was found to be α = 0.672, and for malicious envy, it was α = 0.745.
ConclusionsThe BeMaS showed good internal consistency in an Iranian adult sample. As a result, the Persian version of the BeMaS has good reliability and validity for assessing envy in the Iranian population.
Keywords: Envy, Psychological Tests, Reliability, Statistical Analysis -
Background
Labor is an important experience for women that affects them physically and emotionally. Women and their families need safety and a humanistic approach during labor. Measuring women’s perception of respectful maternity care provided in health facilities is important to provide holistic and humanistic care during labor.
ObjectivesThis study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the respectful maternity care (RMC) scale.
MethodsThis methodological study was conducted on 150 postpartum women in Adana, Turkey from January to June 2021. Data were analyzed in SPSS v.22 and AMOS v.22 using suitable analysis methods. Researchers studied the RMC scale for the reliability of language, content, construct, validity, and internal consistency. The validity analysis of the scale was examined using Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA), Comparative Fit Index (CFI), Goodness of Fit Index (GFI), and Adjusted Goodness of Fit Index (AGFI) were used for confirmatory factor analysis.
ResultsThe Turkish version of RMC has 12 items and three components. An analysis of the new results indicated a three-factor structure with a Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) value of .84 explaining 70.74% of the total variance. The results showed that the data had a good level of fit with the model, χ²/df = 2.148, CFI = .96, GFI = .92, NFI = .92, TLI = .94, RMSEA = .08. Cronbach’s alpha of the scale was calculated 0.870.
ConclusionThe Turkish version of the RMC scale is a valid and reliable scale for Turkish society.
Keywords: Respectful Care, Materntiy Care, Validity, Reliability, Labor -
Medical Hypothesis, Discovery and Innovation Ophthalmology Journal, Volume:13 Issue: 4, Winter 2024, PP 190 -200Background
The Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire was first introduced and developed in 1997 by the Outcomes Research Group, and was adopted by Allergan, Inc. (Irvine, Goleta, CA). While several tools are available for evaluating dry eye syndrome (DES), the OSDI questionnaire is known to have high reliability and validity. Additionally, although more complex questionnaires are available, the goal of the OSDI is to ensure a rapid diagnosis of ocular surface disease. The OSDI consists of a 12-item questionnaire designed to assess the visual disability caused by DES. The OSDI score can range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater disability. This language-inclusive mini-review aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of previous studies that translated the OSDI into various languages and validated the translated versions.
MethodsOSDI validation studies were identified through a PubMed / MEDLINE and Google Scholar search spanning the 27 years since the establishment of the OSDI, using the broad term “Ocular Surface Disease Index-12 questions” and keywords that is “ocular surface disease index-12,” “translation and validation,” “transcultural validation,” “development,” “cross-cultural adaptation,” and “reliability and validity.” We included original studies that validated the translated version of the OSDI in various languages, presenting the key findings with a focus on reliability and repeatability outcomes.
ResultsThirteen full-text articles were thoroughly reviewed, including those identified through targeted keyword searches and the reference lists of these studies. The papers examined the translation of the English version of the OSDI-12 questionnaire into nine languages: Italian, Arabic, Chinese, Chilean Spanish, Japanese, Filipino, Farsi, Bahasa Melayu, and Brazilian Portuguese. Key details regarding the development, translation, and validation phases were summarized. Most of the included studies adhered to standard guidelines throughout the translation process to create a final version of the OSDI questionnaire. This was followed by clinical validation of the final translated version. The majority of the translated versions were assessed for internal consistency, reliability, test–retest repeatability, and discriminant validity.
ConclusionsThe original English version of the OSDI was translated into validated versions to achieve a final version in nine different languages. The majority of the translated versions demonstrated high reproducibility and reliability. The different language versions of the questionnaire removed language barriers in informing the eye-care community, evaluating DES, and assisting physicians in advising and managing their patients more suitably. Therefore, the validated versions of OSDI can be used as tools for clinical practice and DES research. Validating the OSDI questionnaire in various languages is essential to eliminate the language barrier in the assessment of dry eye disease.
Keywords: Dry Eye Disease, Questionnaire, Validity, Reliability, Translations, Cronbach’S Alpha -
BackgroundThe present study was an effort for the validation and confirmatory factor analysis of the impulsive behaviors scale among a group of Iranian children.MethodsThe present study was a descriptive correlational study. The statistical population of the study included all children aged 8 to 12 years old in Tehran. 315 people were selected using available sampling methods. The scale’s face validity was confirmed after its translation with the acquisition of experts’ and subjects’ perspectives. SPSS and AMOS were used for statistical analyses.ResultsThe results of the confirmatory factor analysis, based on AMOS software, showed that the five-factor structure had a good fit with data of the Iranian sample. Internal consistency coefficients for the lack of perseverance, positive urgency, negative urgency, lack of premeditation and sensation seeking subscales were 0.69, 0.79, 0.66, 0.79 and 0.72, respectively.ConclusionThe results of the present research generally revealed that the children’s impulsive behaviors scale was a valid and reliable instrument capable of measuring impulsive behaviors and could be employed to evaluate impulsive behaviors in research and therapy centers.Keywords: Children, Impulsivity, Reliability, Validity
-
مقدمه
شیوع بالای بیماری های قلبی-عروقی در بین مراجعین دندان پزشکی لزوم آگاهی کافی در این مورد را می طلبد. هدف این مطالعه تدوین یک پرسشنامه روا و پایا برای سنجش آگاهی دانشجویان دندان پزشکی سال آخر درمورد بیماری های قلبی-عروقی بود.
روش بررسیپس از طراحی 38 سوال، چهار حوزه تعیین شد و برای تعیین روایی، 7 نفر متخصص از گروه های دندان پزشکی اجتماعی (2 نفر)، بیماری های دهان (2 نفر)، جراحی فک و صورت (2 نفر) و متخصص قلب (1 نفر)، شاخص های روایی را ارزیابی کردند و سپس برای سنجش پایایی، فرم نهایی با استفاده از روش test-retest به فاصله دو هفته بین 24 نفر دانشجوی سال آخر دندان پزشکی توزیع شد و آماره کاپا محاسبه گردید.
یافته هابرای تعیین روایی کل ابزار مقدار S-CVI از رویکرد توافق کلی برابر 94.73 درصد و در رویکرد میانگین برابر 87.84 درصد شد، همچنین مقادیر I-CVI هر سوال نیز بالای 0.70 بدست آمد. در نهایت از 38 سوال اولیه، 4 سوال به علت عدم سادگی حذف شد و ضریب کاپای 34 سوال باقیمانده به جز سه سوال مقادیری بالای 0.61 بدست آمد، میانه ضریب کاپای کل نیز برابر 0.77 شد.
نتیجه گیریبا توجه به حاصل شدن شاخص های روایی و پایایی در محدوده مطلوب، به نظر می رسد می توان این پرسشنامه را به عنوان ابزاری مفید برای سنجش میزان آگاهی دانشجویان دندان پزشکی از بیماری های قلبی-عروقی استفاده کرد.
کلید واژگان: پرسشنامه، روایی، پایایی، آگاهی، بیماری های قلبی-عروقیForensic Medicine, Volume:30 Issue: 4, 2025, PP 258 -266IntroductionThe high prevalence of cardiovascular diseases among dental clients requires sufficient knowledge in this regard. For this purpose, we aimed to develop a valid and reliable questionnaire to assess the awareness of cardiovascular diseases among final year dental students.
MethodsAfter designing 38 questions, four areas were identified and to determine the validity, 7 specialists from the departments of Community Oral Health (2 people), Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases (2 people), Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (2 people) and Cardiologist (n=1) evaluated the validity indicators and then to measure the reliability. The final form was distributed among 24 senior year dental students two weeks apart using the test-retest method and kappa statistics were calculated.
ResultsTo determine the total validity of the instrument, the S-CVI value of the general agreement approach was 94.73% and in the mean approach was 87.84%. Also, the I-CVI values of each question were above 0.70. Finally, out of the first 38 questions, 4 questions were removed due to lack of simplicity and the kappa coefficient of the remaining 34 questions, except for three questions, was obtained above 0.61, the middle of the total kappa coefficient was equal to 0.77.
ConclusionWith regard to desirable validity and reliability indices, it seems that this questionnaire is a useful tool to assess the awareness of dental students about cardiovascular diseases.
Keywords: Questionnaire, Validity, Reliability, Knowledge, Cardiovascular Diseases -
Background
Pediatric cancer significantly impacts children's physical, emotional, and social well-being, making quality of life (QoL) assessment essential. The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 3.0 (PedsQL™ 3.0) includes both child self-report and parent proxy versions, which are widely used to evaluate QoL in children with chronic conditions, including cancer. However, validating its psychometric properties across different cultural contexts is necessary.
Materials and MethodsA methodological research design was employed for a sample of 200 participants including 100 inpatient children with cancer (mean age ± SD: 9.30 ± 1.85 years) and their mothers (mean age ± SD: 33.61 ± 6.03 years). The content, face, and structural validities of the study were assessed using exploratory factor analyses. The test reliability was also measured through internal consistency calculated with Cronbach's alpha. Moreover, the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to evaluate the test-retest reliability.
ResultsThe results of the study demonstrated acceptable content and face validity for both the child and mother versions of the instrument. The structural validity analysis revealed a five-factor structure for the child version and a six-factor structure for the mother version. The reliability of the instrument was confirmed with satisfactory Cronbach's alpha values (α = 0.85) for both versions, indicating strong internal consistency. Additionally, the inter-rater reliability was assessed with ICC. The assessments yielded the values of 0.87 for the child version and 0.88 for the mother version, suggesting excellent agreement.
ConclusionThe Persian version of the PedsQL™ 3.0 is a valid and reliable tool for assessing the quality of life in children with cancer and their mothers.
Keywords: Cancer, Pediatric, Psychometrics, Quality Of Life, Reliability, Validity -
سابقه و هدف
فعالیت ها و خدمات گسترده ای توسط داروسازان در بخش مراقبت های دارویی در حال انجام است. بنابراین پایش کمی و کیفی این خدمات دارویی در بخش های بستری بیمارستان امری الزامی است. از آن جایی که پایش این گونه خدمات نیازمند ابزار معتبری است هدف این پژوهش تهیه و ارزیابی علم سنجی پرسشنامه ای برای تعیین کمیت کیفیت خدمات مراقبت های دارویی در بخش های عمومی بیمارستان است.
مواد و روش هااین مطالعه یک پژوهش روش شناختی، در جهت تهیه و ارزیابی پرسشنامه پایش خدمات بخش مراقبت دارویی بوده است که از ماه آذر 1402 لغایت ماه تیر 1403 انجام گردید. در جهت تدوین پرسشنامه، ابتدا حیطه ها مشخص شدند. سپس پرسش ها در خصوص حیطه ها در یک بحث گروهی متمرکز مطرح شدند. پس از آن روش بارم بندی مشخص و در نهایت پرسشنامه اولیه در دو بخش (فنی و حرفه ای) به صورت چک لیست تدوین شد. روایی محتوایی ابزار از نظر وضوح، ارتباط، سادگی و ضرورت هر سوال مورد سنجش قرار گرفت. همسانی درونی پرسشنامه با استفاده از آلفای کرونباخ ارزیابی شد.
یافته هامیانگین نسبت روایی محتوایی بخش فنی 0/84 و برای بخش حرفه ای 0/88 بود. هم چنین شاخص اعتبار محتوا برای بخش فنی 0/85و برای جلسه حرفه ای 0/84است. مقادیر آلفا برای بخش اول 0/771 و برای بخش دوم 0/773 بود که نشان دهنده سازگاری داخلی قابل قبول است.
استنتاجنتایج ما ضمن معرفی یک ابزار کاربردی، روایی و پایایی قابل قبولی برای آن نشان داد. این ابزار می تواند برای ارزیابی و کمی سازی خدمات مراقبت های دارویی در بخش های بیمارستانی و هم چنین به عنوان شاخصی برای یافتن مناطق پرخطری که ممکن است خطاهای دارویی رخ دهد مورد استفاده قرار گیرد.
کلید واژگان: داروسازی بیمارستانی، مراقبت های دارویی، پایش، پرسشنامه، پایایی، رواییBackground and purposePharmacists perform a diverse range of activities and services in the field of pharmaceutical care. Therefore, the quantitative and qualitative monitoring of these pharmaceutical services in hospital wards is essential. Since monitoring such services in hospitals requires a valid instrument, the aim of this research is to develop and conduct a scientometric evaluation of a questionnaire to quantify the quality of pharmaceutical care services in general hospital wards.
Materials and methodsThis methodological research was conducted between December 2023 and July 2024. To compile the questionnaire, the relevant areas were first identified. Subsequently, questions related to these areas were developed through a focused group discussion. Next, the appropriate scoring method was determined, and the initial questionnaire was constructed in two parts (technical and professional), formatted as a checklist. The content validity of the instrument was assessed in terms of clarity, simplicity, relevance, and necessity of each question. Internal consistency of the questionnaire was assessed using Cronbach's alpha.
ResultsThe mean content validity ratio of the technical part was 0.84 and 0.88 for the professional part. Also, the content validity index was 0.85 for the technical and 0.84 for the professional part. The alpha values were 0.771 for the first part and 0.773 for the second part, indicating an acceptable internal consistency.
ConclusionWhile introducing a practical instrument, our results revealed acceptable validity and reliability indices for it. This tool can be used to evaluate and quantify pharmaceutical care services in hospital wards, and also as an indicator to identify high-risk areas where medication errors could occur.
Keywords: Hospital Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Care, Monitoring, Questionnaire, Reliability, Validity -
Background
Due to the limited number of valid and reliable tools available to measure the opinions of service recipients regarding the quality of Primary Health Care (PHC), the aim of this study was to develop and validate a patient-centered questionnaire to measure the quality of PHC services.
MethodsThe initial questionnaire was designed through literature review, and then, nine Focus Group Discussion (FGDs) sessions with 102 participants were held. To determine the content validity of the questionnaire, two qualitative (experts’ opinions and suggestions) and quantitative (CVR & CVI) methods were used. A total of 26 experts and 650 Service Recipients (SRs) participated in the validation process of the questionnaire. To measure reliability, test-retest methods and internal consistency were utilized.
ResultsA total of 46 items in five dimensions were recognized as necessary, relevant and understandable by the experts. Content validity was confirmed by experts. According to the experts, the optimal model was explained in the form of five factors: “patient-centeredness”, “continuity of care”, “quality of facilities and basic amenities”, “access and availability” and “trust”. The fit of the extracted model was confirmed by confirmatory factor analysis at the desired level. The internal consistency of the constructs and all sub-constructs of the questionnaire was favorable (Cronbach’s alpha=0.942 and ICC=0.868). Also, the results of the test-retest in all constructs and all sub-constructs confirmed the reliability of the questionnaire.
ConclusionIn this study, a valid and reliable questionnaire was developed to measure the quality of PHC services from the perspective of service recipients. This measure could be applied for better management of PHC centers and improving the quality of services.
Keywords: Healthcare Quality, Patient Centered Care, Primary Health Care, Questionnaire Design, Validity, Reliability -
ObjectivesThe aim of the current study was to investigate the inter-tester reliability of the MSI classification test items in patients with neck pain.Methodssixty subjects with neck pain (18-65 years) participated in this cross-sectional study. The examination of each patient, included the evaluation of signs and symptoms during posture and movement tests and the MSI diagnosis of subjects with cervical pain, was performed simultaneously by three testers in one session. Kappa and gamma values were used to determine the measure of agreement between testers for each of the test items and classification judgment.ResultsThe kappa values for inter-tester reliability of the sign items ranged from 0.36 to 1. For the symptom items kappa values ranged from 0.36 to 1. The kappa values of inter-tester reliability for patients' classification judgments ranged from 0.71 to 0.73.ConclusionThe inter-tester reliability between three testers according to the MSI approach for neck pain classification, sign and symptom was generally acceptable. Level of evidence: IIIKeywords: Classification, Impairment, Mechanical Neck Pain, Movement System, Reliability
-
Background
The purpose of designing and evaluating the psychometric properties of an activity of daily living (ADL) questionnaire for heart failure (HF) patients is to improve the management of HF patients by accurately identifying their ADL needs and challenges.
MethodsThis study had two stages: (1) developing the ADL questionnaire and reviewing its items; and (2) evaluating the psychometric properties of the questionnaire. The questionnaire items were generated through a literature review. Face validity was assessed qualitatively and quantitatively. Content validity was determined using content validity index and content validity ratio calculations. Construct validity was examined by having 180 HF patients complete the ADL questionnaire and conducting exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Convergent validity was assessed through Pearson correlation, and inter-rater reliability was calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient.
ResultsAccording to the literature and a panel of experts, the questionnaire comprised 13 final items, all of which demonstrated good face validity. The content validity of all items was deemed appropriate. The scale showed a construct validity of 0.98 and a convergent validity of 0.73. It was also found to be reliable, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.97 and an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.9.
DiscussionThe final ADL questionnaire proved to be a valid and reliable scale for assessing ADL in HF patients, indicating its potential for evaluating disease-specific ADL challenges in this population.
Keywords: Activity Of Daily Living, Heart Failure, Validity, Reliability, Questionnaire, Psychometric Properties -
Background & Objective
Burnout is characterized by emotional exhaustion and affects diverse professionals, with healthcare students at high risk due to academic and clinical stressors. The Copenhagen Burnout Inventory–Student Survey (CBI-SS) has not been studied in healthcare students in the Indian context. This study aims to evaluate the psychometric properties of the English version of the CBI-SS.
Material & MethodsThis cross-sectional study, conducted in 2022, included 416 undergraduate and 107 postgraduate students from health profession institutions at a private university. The response rate was 65.45%. Descriptive and inferential statistics were evaluated for the CBI-SS with 25 items via JMP software. The tool was subjected to content and face validity. The interitem correlation was tested before the scale was subjected to Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). The EFA indices considered were Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin test (KMO) and the Bartlett test of specificity. The CFA fit indices included the degree of freedom, Tucker Lewis index (TLI), freedom ratio (χ²/df), Goodness-of-Fit Index (GFI), Comparative Fit Index (CFI), Root Mean Square Error Of Approximation (RMSEA), and Normed Fit Index (NFI).
ResultsThe content validity index averaged 0.9, and face validity was favorable. The Cronbach's alpha scores were between 0.7 and 0.8. The EFA yielded KMO values above 0.9, and Bartlett's test yielded chi-square = 8880.727, df = 300, p < 0.0001. The fit indices for CFA were the Tucker and Lewis indices, with a score of 0.919 and an RMSEA score of 0.068, demonstrating a relationship between the items and the constructs.
ConclusionThis study highlights the usefulness of the CBI-SS in assessing burnout in allied health science and dental student populations. The results indicate that the CBI-SS is a reliable and valid instrument for identifying student burnout and developing strategies to prevent burnout among potentially vulnerable student populations in the Indian context.
Keywords: CBI-SS, Burnout Syndrome, Reliability, Validity, Healthcare Professional Students, Indian Context -
Background
Stroke is recognized as the second leading cause of death and the third leading cause of both disability and mortality on a global scale. Over the past few decades, the burden of stroke has continued to rise. The CBI, a commonly used tool across various caregiver populations, has demonstrated its effectiveness in comprehensively evaluating the impact of burden. The study is methodological that to the aim of translation and evaluate the validation the Caregiver Burden Inventory among Caregivers of Stroke Patients (CBI).
MethodsThe 'forward-backward' procedure was applied to translate the questionnaire from English into Persian. One hundred and twelve caregivers of stroke patients were included in this study completed measure (translated version of the CBI). Validity was assessed using exploratory factor analysis and known group comparison. The Cronbach's alpha was used to assess reliability of the CBI.
ResultsThe mean age of caregivers of stroke patients was 47.06 (SD=9.07) years and the majority were woman (79.5%). The construct validity of the CBI was assessed using exploratory factor analysis, which identified four factors: Development and Physical health, time-dependence, emotional health and Social Relationships. Together, these factors explained 68.6% of the total variance observed. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the CBI was 0.94, with values ranging from 0.80 to 0.93 for its subscales.
ConclusionsThe results of this study provide evidence that the Persian version of the CBI is a reliable and valid tool for measuring burden among caregivers of stroke patients. These results can inform the development of interventions to improve caregiving outcomes for both caregivers and stroke patients.
Keywords: Translation, Validity, Reliability, Caregiver Burden Inventory, Stroke Patients -
Background
Depression literacy has notable advantages in the early identification and treatment of depression. The current study was conducted with the aim of translating and investigating the validity and reliability of the Depression Literacy Questionnaire (D‑Lit) in Iranian young adults.
MethodsThe current study entailed a descriptive‑analytical study in which the translation, validation, and preparation of the Persian version of D‑Lit were conducted. It had two stages: translation and validation. In order to check the composite reliability, the statistical population consisted of Iranian adults in the city of Mashhad, and 300 people participated in this study in the form of a census. The content validity ratio (CVR) and content validity index (CVI) indices were used for content validity.
ResultsThe results of the content validity evaluation of this questionnaire indicated that both the CVR and CVI indices have higher‑than‑average coefficients (0.78 and 0.83). Furthermore, the Cronbach’s alpha value for the components of the D‑Lit was found to be higher than 0.70. In the present study, the questionnaire’s reliability was assessed using the intra‑cluster correlation coefficient (ICC), and the difficulty coefficient for the whole questionnaire and its sub‑components was at a favorable level. Out of 22 questions, 17 questions of this questionnaire were retained and questions 1, 17, and 22 were removed due to low CVR and CVI in the validity stage, and questions 5 and 13 were removed due to common factor load in the factor analysis stage.
ConclusionAccording to the content validity and reliability in this study, this tool can be used to identify underlying factors, etiology, and treatment of depression.
Keywords: Depression Literacy Questionnaire, Reliability, Validity -
Background
An accurate assessment of food intake is necessary to monitor nutritional status. However, differences in cultures and dietary habits between communities make it necessary to create culturally specific tools to evaluate food intake. This study aimed to develop and validate a short food frequency questionnaire (SH‑FFQ) in Iranian adults.
MethodsThis perspective longitudinal study was conducted during four months. A total of 135 healthy adults over 18 years (both of sex) were included. The 24‑hour dietary recalls (24‑HDRs) (three times per month: A total of 12 numbers) were collected as reference for validation of SH‑FFQ. Participants completed two SH‑FFQ, once at the end of the fourth month for validity, and the second one week after the first administration for reliability assessing.
ResultsReliability analysis showed that the mean difference between the two SH‑FFQs was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). None of the correlation coefficients (rs ) were less than 0.4. There was a substantial or perfect correlation (r > 0.6) in 85.1% and a moderate correlation (r = 0.4–0.6) in 14.9% of food items. For validity assessment, the average values of two SH‑FFQ1 and SH‑FFQ2 (SH‑FFQ) were compared with the average values of 24‑HDRs. All of the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of between SH‑FFQ and 24‑HDRs were equal to or greater than 0.4 (except one item). Moderate correlation (ICC = 0.4–0.6) and substantial or perfect correlation (ICC > 0.6) were observed in 38.3% and 59.6% of food items, respectively.
ConclusionsThe current study showed that the developed SH‑FFQ is reliable and valid in Iranian adults. This developed SH‑FFQ can be used in nutritional assessments.
Keywords: Adult, Dietary Assessment, Iran, Reliability, Validity -
Psychometric properties of the Croatian version of the Multiple Sclerosis International Quality of Life QuestionnaireAims
This study aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of the Multiple Sclerosis International Quality of Life (MusiQoL) questionnaire for Croatian-speaking MS patients.
MethodsEighty-two patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) participated in the study (51 female and 31 male, average age 42.6±11.9 years). The instrument used in this study was MusiQoL questionnaire which was translated into Croatian language using forward-backward translation method. The data was descriptively analysed. Cronbach’s α internal consistency coefficient and test-retest analyses were conducted for reliability. Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) was used to analyse the relationship between the MusiQoL index and dimensions. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted to test construct validity.
FindingsThe mean value (±standard deviation) for MusiQoL index measured 64.18±17.13, while the dimension scores ranged from 54.73±28.12 to 84.05±18.85. High internal consistency was found for the MusiQoL index (Cronbach’s α: 0,93). All dimensions of the MusiQoL showed high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α: 0.75-0.95). The intra-class correlation coefficient of the MusiQoL dimensions and MusiQoL index were 0.949-0.971 and 0.911, respectively. There was a moderately to strong relationship between MusiQoL index with dimensions (r: 0.43-0.86). Bartlett's significance test of the correlation matrix is high and significant (χ2=2028.41, p<0.001). The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin coefficient was calculated as 0.801. The extracted factors explained 66.10% of the variance and the range of factor loading was 0.52-0.90.
ConclusionThe Croatian version of the MusiQoL questionnaire is valid and reliable in measuring quality of life among Croatian-speaking MS patients. It is especially useful for measuring health-related quality of life in terms of clinical practice.
Keywords: Croatia, Multiple Sclerosis, Quality Of Life, Patients, Reliability, Validity -
To perform effective prevention programs, we need to know how well people follow prevention protocols, like mask use and social distancing, measuring using standard tools. This study aims to develop and validate a brief questionnaire to assess the compliance with prevention protocols against infectious respiratory diseases pandemics including COVID-19 in pedestrians. This cross-sectional study was conducted using convenience sampling method in May and June 2021. Construct validity of the questionnaire was assessed using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA). Content validity was evaluated by quantitative method, thus, Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Content Validity Index (CVI) were calculated. For reliability of the questionnaire, the internal consistency using Cronbach’s alpha, and test-retest reliability using Spearman-Brown correlation coefficient were assessed. A total of 324 persons from three provinces of Iran participated in this study. The mean age (SD) of participants was 41.5 (16.7). The CVR values resulted in the elimination of two questions. The Scale level CVI/Average (S-CVI/Ave) was equal to 0.992; and Scale level CVI/Universal Agreement (S-CVI/UA) was 0.889. One factor with five items emerged from principal component factor analysis accounting for 51.99% of the variance. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient equal to 0.76 indicated an acceptable internal consistency and the Spearman-Brown correlation coefficient of 0.939 depicted stability of the questionnaire. This questionnaire is a brief tool with acceptable validity and reliability to evaluate the compliance with preventive protocols during infectious respiratory diseases outbreaks in order for policy-makers to make effective interventions to slow down the spread of disease.
Keywords: Validity, Reliability, Psychometric, Pedestrian, Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), Epidemiology -
زمینه و هدف
استیگما به نگرش ها و باورهای منفی و مخربی اشاره دارد که جامعه نسبت به برخی گروه های اجتماعی، مانند بیماران روانی، معلولان و یا نژاد خاصی دارد. در ایران پرسشنامه جامع و دقیقی درباره سنجش استیگمای معلولیت جسمی از دیدگاه جامعه شناختی وجود ندارد. بنابراین هدف از این پژوهش تعیین و روایی و پایایی پرسشنامه استیگمای معلولیت جسمی بود.
روش بررسیمطالعه حاضر یک مطالعه پیمایشی مقطعی است که در بین 620 نفر از معلولان جسمی ساکن شهرهای تهران و یاسوج به روش نمونه گیری در دسترس انجام گرفت. برای ارزیابی روایی پرسشنامه از اعتبار محتوایی، صوری، سازه، همگرا، واگرا، متقاطع اشتراکی و افزونگی و جهت ارزیابی پایایی از آلفای کرونباخ، روش لوپ و قابلیت اعتماد ترکیبی استفاده شد. داده های جمع آوری شده با استفاده از نرم افزارهای آماری SPSS و PLS تجزیه و تحلیل شدند.
یافته هانتایج نشان داد که اعتبار همگرا در سطح متغیرها (50/0< AVE) و در سطح گویه ها (40/0< بارهای عاملی) برقرار است؛ که نشان از اعتبار و دقت گویه های مورد بررسی برای اندازه گیری متغیرهای مربوط به خود بوده است. با توجه به مقادیر بارهای عاملی، در اندازه گیری استیگمای اجتماعی، بعد استیگمای خانوادگی (770/0)، در اندازه گیری استیگمای درک شده، بعد«احساس متفاوت دیده شدن (870/0)» و در اندازه گیری خودانگ زنی، بعد «استیگمای اجتناب (871/0) » بیشتر از دیگر ابعاد نقش داشته اند. هم چنین نشان داده شد که اعتبار واگرا در سطح متغیرها و گویه ها برقرار است و طبق شاخص فورنل لارکر جذر میانگین واریانس استخراج شده هر متغیر بیشتر از حداکثر همبستگی آن متغیر با متغیرهای دیگر است. نتایج قابلیت اعتماد ترکیبی نشان داد پرسشنامه از پایایی ثبات درونی قابل قبولی برخوردار است و پایایی مدل اندازه گیری مورد تایید است (70/0 < CR). در آخر نتایج روایی متقاطع اشتراکی و افزونگی نشان داد که مدل اندازه گیری از تناسب و قدرت پیش بینی خوبی برخوردار است (11/0 < Q2).
نتیجه گیریبا توجه به بررسی شاخص های روایی و پایایی ابزار اندازه گیری، می توان گفت که این پرسشنامه از نظر محتوا مناسب است و گویه ها توانسته اند متغیرهای مورد نظر خود را به خوبی اندازه گیری کنند. همچنین پرسشنامه مذکور از کیفیت خوب و مطلوبی برخوردار بوده و می تواند ابزار مناسبی برای اندازه گیری استیگمای معلولیت جسمی باشد.
کلید واژگان: استیگما، پایایی، روایی، معلولیت، پرسشنامهArmaghane-danesh, Volume:29 Issue: 5, 2024, PP 754 -778Background & aimStigma refers to negative and destructive attitudes and beliefs that society has towards some social groups, such as mental patients, disabled people, or a certain race. In Iran, there is no comprehensive and accurate questionnaire about the stigma of physical disability from a sociological point of view. Therefore, the purpose of this research was to determine the validity and reliability of the physical disability stigma questionnaire.
MethodsThe present survey-cross-sectional study that was conducted among 620 people with physical disabilities living in Tehran and Yasuj cities using convenience sampling method. In order to evaluate the validity of the questionnaire, content, face, construct, convergent, discriminant, Cross-validated Communality and redundancy were used, and Cronbach's alpha, loop method, and composite reliability were used to evaluate reliability. Data were analyzed using SPSS ans PLS analytical softwares.
ResultsThe results indicated that convergent validity was established at the level of variables (AVE > 0.50) and at the level of items (factor loadings > 0.40) which indicated the validity and accuracy of the investigated items to measure the related variables. According to factor loading values, in measuring social stigma, family stigma dimension (0.770); In the measurement of perceived stigma, the dimension of "feeling being seen differently (0.870)" and in the measurement of self-stigma, the dimension of "avoidance stigma (0.871)" had a greater impact than other dimensions. It was correspondingly displayed that divergent validity was established at the level of variables and items, and according to the Fornell-Larcker index, the square root of the extracted average variance of each factor was greater than the maximum correlation of that factor with other factors. The results of combined reliability indicated that the questionnaire had acceptable internal consistency reliability and the reliability of the measurement model was confirmed (CR > 0.70). Finally, the results of common cross-validity and redundancy revealed that the measurement model had good quality, appropriateness and predictive power (Q2 > 0.11).
ConclusionAccording to the validity and reliability indicators of the measurement tool, it can be said that this questionnaire was appropriate in terms of content. The items were able to measure the desired variables. Moreover, the questionnaire had a worthy and satisfactory quality and can be a proper tool for measuring the physical disability stigma.
Keywords: Stigma, Reliability, Validity, Disability, Questionnaire -
Background
The University of Washington quality of life questionnaire (UW-QOL) is widely used to evaluate the quality of life for head and neck cancer patients. The purpose of this study is translation of the UW-QOL questionnaire's into Persian.
MethodsAfter translation and cultural adaptation of the UW-QOL, the questionnaire was distributed among 100 head and neck cancer patients. Internal reliability of the translated UW-QOL was determined using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. The validity was determined by Spearman correlation coefficient between UW-QOL and 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12). The test – retest reliability was measured by Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) after one week.
ResultsCronbach's alpha coefficient was more than 0.75 and ICC coefficient was more than 0.80 in all variables. The UW-QOL questionnaire composite score had a positive significant association with SF-12 questionnaire total score (Spearman's Correlation Coefficient= 0.70, P< 0.0001).
ConclusionIn conclusion Persian translation of the UW-QOL questionnaire has acceptable reliability and validity and is as valid as the original English version in evaluating the quality of life for patients with head and neck cancer.
Keywords: UW-QOL Questionnaire, Validity, Head, Neck Cancer, Reliability -
مجله پزشکی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز، سال چهل و ششم شماره 4 (پیاپی 172، مهر و آبان 1403)، صص 419 -429زمینه
مطالعه حاضر با هدف تعیین روایی و پایایی ترجمه فارسی پرسش نامه استعداد حواس پرتی راننده (SDDQ) در تبریز صورت گرفت.
روش کاراین مطالعه از نوع مقطعی است. بدین منظور تعداد 411 نفر از بین رانندگان آژانس های تاکسی تلفنی درون شهری شهر تبریز (شمال غرب ایران) به صورت تصادفی خوشه ای دو مرحله ای انتخاب گردید. روند ترجمه نسخه فارسی ابزار بدین ترتیب بود که ابتدا پرسش نامه اصلی توسط یک مترجم دو زبانه از انگلیسی به فارسی ترجمه شد و سپس توسط متخصص دیگری به زبان اصلی ترجمه گردید. صحت محتوی ترجمه دو نسخه فوق مورد تایید نهایی تیم پژوهشی قرار گرفت.
یافته هاثبات درونی کل و زیر مقیاس های ابزار با استفاده از ضریب آلفای کرونباخ مابین 0/72 الی 0/90 بدست آمد. شاخص توافق روایی محتوی و با استفاده از ضریب کاپای اصلاح شده *k برای کل مقیاس، 0/88 بدست آمد. نتایج حاصل از مقایسه مدل سازی با معادله ساختاری برابر مدل های یک، سه و شش عاملی نشان داد که روایی سازه مدل شش عاملی از برازش ساختاری بهتری برخوردار بود. بر اساس نتایج حاصل از ضریب همبستگی پیرسون بین زیرمقیاس ها با کل پرسش نامه بین 0/41 الی 0/92 بود. ضریب همبستگی پیرسون با مقیاس ذهن آگاهی (MAAS) 0/39 و با مقیاس ADHD کانرز بزرگسالان (شدت علایم ADHD) 0/25 بود (0/01>P).
نتیجه گیرینسخه فارسی پرسش نامه استعداد حواس پرتی راننده از روایی و پایایی قابل قبولی برخوردار است و می تواند در مطالعات مختلف برای رانندگان استفاده گردد.
کلید واژگان: روایی و پایایی، ویژگی های روان سنجی، پرسش نامه استعداد حواس پرتی راننده، اپیدمیولوژیBackgroundThis study aimed to investigate the validity and reliability of the Persian translation of the Susceptibility to Driver Distraction Questionnaire (SDDQ) among the inner-city drivers in Tabriz.
MethodsIn this cross-sectional study, 411 telephone taxi drivers from Tabriz city (northwest of Iran) and selected using a two-stage cluster random sampling were included. To produce an accurate Persian translation of the SDDQ, first, some bilingual specialists were asked to render the questionnaire into Persian from English and, then, another bilingual expert was asked to back-translate the produced Persian translation into English using a standard "forward-backward" translation procedure. The accurate content agreement of the translation with the above-mentioned versions was finally approved by the research team. Data management and analysis were performed using SPSS 26.0 and LISREL 8.80.
ResultsThe internal consistency of the whole scale and subscales of the SDDQ was determined between 0.72 and 0.90 using Cronbach's α coefficient. The agreement between the original version and re-translation version was determined 0.66 to 1 using modified Kappa coefficient (k*). The results of the equal structural equation indicated that the construct validity of the six-factor model had a greater structural fit. Pearson's correlation coefficient between subscales and the whole-scale was found to be between 0.41 and 0.92. Furthermore, the correlation between SDDQ and Mindfulness Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) was 0.39, while the correlation between SDDQ and Conner’s Adult ADHD Rating Scales (severity of ADHD symptoms) was 0.25 (P<0.01).
ConclusionIn sum, the Persian version of susceptibility to driver distraction questionnaire may have been used as a valid and reliable scale for investigating the Persian-speaking drivers in Iran.
Keywords: Validity, Reliability, Psychometric Properties, Susceptibility To Driver Distraction Questionnaire, Epidemiology -
Objective
The Social and Emotional Competencies Questionnaire (SEC-Q) represents one of the existing tests for assessing these competences in students. The purpose of the present research was to examine the psychometric properties of the SEC-Q in Moroccan nursing students.
MethodA sample of 320 Moroccan nursing students, including 190 women and 130 men, was selected using a stratified convenience sampling method. Methodology consisted of forward and backward translations, linguistic adaptation, and pilot revision. Structural validity was investigated using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Reliability was assessed through test-retest analysis using Pearson's correlation.
ResultsFactor analyses produced a four-factor version of 16 items with a range of factor loadings from 0.72 to 0.89. Cronbach's alpha values were 0.92 for the self-awareness factor, 0.91 for the self-management factor, 0.90 for the social awareness factor, and 0.92 for the decision-making factor. These high values indicate excellent reliability. The test-retest coefficient for a 20-day interval between two assessments gave an rtt value of 0.92, demonstrating excellent response reliability. A strong correlation between the SECQ-AV, WLEIS and PSS-CP was found, demonstrating satisfactory convergent and divergent validity (P < 0.05).
ConclusionThe Arabic version of SECQ demonstrated its validity and reliability for assessing social and emotional competencies in Moroccan nursing students. However, the sample selected was drawn from a single nursing training institute, which limits the representativeness of the entire student population, and makes it difficult to generalize the results. A cross-sectional study will therefore produce much more varied results, by including a very large sample from different regions and different nursing training institutes in Morocco.
Keywords: Nursing Students, Psychometrics, Questionnaire, Social Competence, Validity, Reliability
- نتایج بر اساس تاریخ انتشار مرتب شدهاند.
- کلیدواژه مورد نظر شما تنها در فیلد کلیدواژگان مقالات جستجو شدهاست. به منظور حذف نتایج غیر مرتبط، جستجو تنها در مقالات مجلاتی انجام شده که با مجله ماخذ هم موضوع هستند.
- در صورتی که میخواهید جستجو را در همه موضوعات و با شرایط دیگر تکرار کنید به صفحه جستجوی پیشرفته مجلات مراجعه کنید.