Expansion of debate of a happy-ending world presumption based on a debate of messianism

The theory of debate is simply providing an atmosphere of ideas in such a way that these ideas dominate and govern over the other areas of thinking till the time that it will form the behavioral pattern of the people. The debate is generated within an interactive atmosphere; interaction with the history, interaction with the social conditions, interaction with power and interaction with the social crises. There are two attitudes of a happy-ending world and an unhappy-ending world presumption in relation with the end of the Globe and the Being which are against each other. We claim that based on the Islamic teachings particularly the instructions of Shiite, a happing-ending presumption and future and full of hope and joy has been pictured for the human being and the world. Therefore, one can present such idea through media in the format of a predominant debate all over the world and develop a debate based upon wisdom, theism and the purposefulness of the creation. Since from one hand, The Islamic Republic of Iran is the only governing system and the country which explicitly declares itself as the believer and follower of the Shiite ideology. From the other hand, not only there isn’t any logical and harmonic explicitly regarding the idea of happy-ending presumption in other ideological, philosophical, speculative and political systems with respect to the finality of both history and the existence- but they tend towards the idea of unhappy-ending presumption - and/or there are attitudes which are close to messianist in some philosophical systems; however, neither of them are not as coherent as the philosophy of Recrudescence. Thus, a very welcome opportunity has been provided for Islamic Republic of Iran to be able to be a harbinger and pretender of such a debate.