The Rights of Access or Refusal to Clarify the Concept of Public Order (The Rights of Iran, Britain and France)

There has long been no compromise between the experts about an important subject such as public regularity. In spite of the high importance of public regularity concept in ordering the legal system and also confining legitimate rights of citizens and exposure of legal return, according to contravention, passing or deviation from it. Hence, two different proponents and opponents have tried to prove their own beliefs against each other according to applying reasons and each of them has offered some logics about their own rightfulness. The authors regarding the parties’ reasons, necessary pillars and criteria about this idea believe that, since in all topics related to public regularity, the target is to avoid doing any task, there identifying and defining the concept of public order is an important issue which cannot be overlooked easily. Authors defend a doctrine with different reasons that needs and necessitates presenting a definite description. It is also emphasized to explain this concept and remove the existing challenges need endeavor of legislators and lawyers in illustrating profits and social benefits as an undeniable subject.