Impact of Hermeneutics on Jurisprudence and its Fundamentals

With the advent of Western Philosophy discussions in Islamic world, Islamic scholars have faced new topics in this regard. Hermeneutics is one of these sciences, which has raised lots of debates in the areas of understanding, knowledge and commentary in Islamic sciences. This article mentions only some of the debates of this area which are related to Jurisprudence. There exist questions such as whether there is a connection between these two branches of the science and or one of these fields can impact on the other or be impacted by. If assumed that the Hermeneutics is effective [on other sciences], then is it part of the Jurisprudence or is it an emerging juridical issue by itself? Among the issues being discussed in this article is how do the Hermeneutic approaches interact with the Jurisprudence or impact on. In this article after a brief explanation of the case and expressing the fundamental distinctions of the two approaches in Hermeneutics, first, a view that maintains no relationship between hermeneutics and Jurisprudence has been criticized and in the second stage, the status of the Hermeneutics in comparison to Jurisprudence and also this question whether the Hermeneutics is part of the Jurisprudence have been explained. Finally we try to consider how the two fundamental Hermeneutic approaches (i.e. Classic Hermeneutics and Philosophic Hermeneutics) independently impact on Jurisprudence.