Undiscovered mysteries in the field of " interpretation" in " Kashf-al-asrar" commentary

Meibodi has developed Khaje Abdollah Ansari, his professor’s commentary. Also, he has illustrated its illusions, facts, and subtleties, and then, he has called it “Kashf-al-asrar” and “Eddat-al-Abrar”. The advantages of this 6th -century heritage are expression beauty and Persian fluent prose. Taking apart translation from commentary and illusions are other ones. However, calling it “Kashf-al-asrar” has a reason. Meibodi’s main claim is to decode Quranic meanings, concepts, idioms, and phrases. Interpretation has been the most important matter from the early years of Islam so far. There are various meanings and different stances about interpretation in this commentary, but it implies that interpretation has still undiscovered mysteries. Therefore, its decoding by virtue of formalism in the text commentary, scolding speech interpretation of verses, and an attitude to mystical commentary have been doubled its complexity. As a result, Meibodi couldn’t decode interpretation’s mysteries.