Consideration of The Legal System of " Right to Strike" In The United States of America And The Laws of The Islamic Republic of Iran

The right to strike is required to a dependency relations and job contract that is created on the defense of job demands and the employer refused to accept them through protests or work slowdown or interruption of work that is caused by workers. Undoubted, the legal perspective of different countries according to the type of their rule, is different than the legal right to strike. Hence, this right which is required admission of syndicate organizations activity, considered as a tool to justify and agreement credit and treaties as well as the result of negotiations between the parties. In Iran's law, despite the fact this law has been mentioned implicity, but seems to have problems and shortcomings that undoubted, the resistance of lawmaker to not completing and not correcting them, applying this right is faced with numerous difficulties to their legal owners and the government. For this purpose, the authors have attempted in this paper to implement comparative consideration of this system in the rights of the United States of America and have identified it's shortcomings and strengths, and have focused on the current labor law and other relevant laws and regulations to compare them at the aim of attention and evaluation of legislators.