The present paper is a critique of the article “Similarity between Monotheistic Religions; Distortion of the Bible and the Quran” which appeared in the 21st issue of the journal “Knowledge of Religions”. Pointing out the incompleteness of the suppositions and ideas in the article “Similarity between Religions”, the critic tries to render unsound answer to the doubt raised about “literal distortion of the Quran by resting on the traditions showing the similarity of between nations”. He argues that answering this doubt i.e. similarity is not complete; it is a rather right answer. He believes that traditions of similarity are related by one person and one cannot prove beliefs through such narrations. Moreover, he holds that the impossibility of comparing the Quran with the Bible does not answer the doubts raised by Mohaddeth Nuri. We should not regard the implication of traditions on similarity to be perfect and the idea of literal distortion of the Quran must be dismissed. Using new statements, this paper seeks to prove the claim that Mohaddeth Nuri has made a mistake when he compared the Qur’an with the Bible because this is a false analogy. Besides, a new reasoning called “traditions on similarity between religions and proving the literal infallibility of the Quran” was presented. It verifies the literal infallibility of the Quran”.