Feasibility Study on the Process of Rulemaking as the Bases of Diverse Rules in the Globalization (Does the Base of Legal Rules Turn to Objectivity?)

Lawmaking was related to the state sovereignty exclusively, more than the other government acts, and an interference of the another actors was forbidden. Then the answer of ‘why is a rule binding?’ referred to local reasons such as legitimacy, religious roots of rule or will of government. This circumstance has been changed by internationalization of law and international agreements became source of rights and obligations. Non-exclusive process of lawmaking continues so now rules are binding that neither government nor citizens have role in making them. Is there any evolution in the basses of law? Why is such a rule supposed to be binding by subjects of law? It can be explained by globalization as a non-legal phenomenon. Lifting out is the main element of globalization which is tied to abstraction and objectivity. Consequently transition of legal rules, with local and subjective bases, beyond political borders is impossible in global era. Applying the elements of good governance (like transparency, participation and consensusoriented) more over protecting and promoting of international human rights, as an element of good governance and alternative of global morality, lead to objectivity of the bases of rules.