Everyone is infallible on consciousness of himself An analysis and critique of the Locke's Cartesian explanation for mentioned belief and offer an alternative explanation based on the doctrine

We believe that everyone consciousness from himself is infallible while human consciousness from other things or even consciousness of other people to him is not infallible. How can explain this asymmetry? The most common response is usually based on the Locke''s Cartesian explanation. Initially، we reduce this explanation in to four hypotheses. We believe that everyone consciousness from himself is infallible while human consciousness from other things or other people''s consciousness to him is not infallible. How can explain this asymmetry? The most common response is usually based on the Locke''s Cartesian explanation. Initially، we reduce this explanation into four hypotheses and then we will show that why can (or should) we are looking for an alternative explanation. Finally، we will provide an alternative explanation with reliance on the views of the later Wittgenstein، which based on that، belief in the infallibility of human in the consciousness of itself returns only to a linguistic presupposition which prepares us to interpret our words.