Comparative Study of morning report in conventional & Evidence Based Medicine forms, from the viewpoint of medical students Print

One of the most important educational method in medical sciences is Morning Report. Evidence Based Medicine (EBM) is a new approach that has been considered to improve the quality of clinical care. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare of morning report in regular & Evidence Based Medicine from the viewpoint of medical students.
A cross-sectional study was carried out on 87 students in OB&GYN departments of Besat hospital in Sanandaj in 2014. Sampling was done through consensus. Data was collected by a researcher- made questionnaire that include 3 Section and 26 Items including Demographic and educational factors, information about Structure and content of morning report, and Section about Improving students skills in regular and EBM method. The reliability of the questionnaire using Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.85. Data was analyzed by SPSS software and T-test and Chi-square test.
The results showed that 85 students (97%) declare 8 (A.M) as suitable time of holding morning Report in Routine and EBM group. The average duration of Morning Report in EBM group was 42.10 minutes and in Routine group was 38.6 minutes. There was significant difference between EBM and regular in presenting feedback (P0.05). In EBM group students ability was promoted more than routine group (p Conditions of Morning Report structure was observed within acceptable level in two groups. To improve Morning Report it should be more emphasized on the structure and content of meetings such as feedback, participation and interaction between the audiences and subjects about promoting the ability of students.