Evaluation of Goodness or Badness of Human Nature Based on Transcendent Philosophy.

Evaluation of human nature and its goodness and badness has been an ancient and important issue being discussed in various religious and philosophical schools. For some of them¡ human is good-natured while for some others he is bad-natured and for another group human has no common nature. This paper probes accurate responses to three main questions including: firstly¡ what is the reality of human nature from an ontological perspective? Secondly¡ what is the main belonging of “goodness and badness” in regard to human nature? And thirdly¡ what is the source of bad actions of human? According to transcendental philosophy¡ human nature−which includes his natural and instinctive talents− refers to the manner of his existence. Every creature has a specific existential degree within every stage and it is a kind of blessing¡ goodness and perfection to the amount of its existential degree. The existential philosophy of natural and instinctive talents−the most important of which is reason−includes human perfection and his blissful survival. Therefore¡ from an ontological perspective¡ human nature is described only as “goodness” and because it includes the natural reason−which is the manager of human inclinations− it will be the source of rightful actions. The main belonging in regard to human nature is the goodness or badness of his actions and the source of bad actions of human are his inherited and acquired traits not their nature.