Bany-Abbas and their relationship to the signs of emergence

According to Ahlul Bayt accounts, the conflicts preceding and fall of the Bany-Abbas is expressed in the ranks of some of the signs of emergence, such as riots Sufyany.
In the analysis of these traditions, the probability is raised that this may not be the case. In this article, through a descriptive and analytical style, traditions of Ahlul Bayt explain how this relationship has been studied through six possiblities:1. Incorrect comparison between Bani Folan (the sons of anonymous) and the Bany-Abbas; 2. Falsifying the accounts; 3. Returning the government on the eve of the emergence to the Bany-Abbas; 4. The possibility on the Bada on this subject; 5. Pointing the narratives to a similar group as of Bany-Abbas, not the very Bany-Abbas; 6. The emergence of confusion between the signs and symptoms of emergence of the Saviour, detached from its threshold. Finally among the possibilities mentioned, it is stated that the probability of the latter is confirmed with evidence.
The atmosphere of the Shia and the serious waiting of the Shiite for emergence at that period of time reflects the fact that the differences and the fall Bany-Abbas, including news about the future Imams is in the coincidence with other news such as riots Sufyan, which has created the impression for some that the two events occur at a simultaneous time; while this is not proven.