Estimation and Evaluation of Sustainability neighborhood in the City of Tehran, ‎Case study: Valiasr shomali Neighborhoods, Ashtiani, Niloufar and Imamiye

IntroductionNeighborhood as a constituent element and smallest part of social and spatial of city and ýlink citizens, it can also at least strengthen social capital, natural, human and economic, ýurban sustainable development to have at all levelsþ. þý In other words, the neighborhood as a ýnormative concept in which social obligations are formed based on shared values, and ýbecause of the relationship between humans and the environment and correct ýunderstanding and expectations commensurate with the natural and social competences, ýmay underlie the social and ecological justice and balance in relation with sustainable ýdevelopment is at different levels. Since theþ þwithout relying on local and national ýsustainable development as a primary focus of social life - ever, are not allowed. So in ýrecent years, serious attention to the sustainable development of city officials and urban ýplanners at different levels of social, economic and cultural, tangible aspects of urban life ýand lower levels (neighborhood) has attracted. The attention to the importance of ýsustainable development neighborhood in Tehran is very important because there are a lot ýof problems. ý
Tehran, the capital and largest city of the country, until the early part of this century, ýaccording to multiple sources and organizes all elements of Persian cities with Islamic ýelements in the visible region was dry. But in recent decades, neighborhood structure in ýthree steps, ýþ»þcentrality of the family unit neighborhood ýþ «þý, ýþ» þFew places combine family and ýcareerþ «þý and ýþ» þNeighborhood Removingþ«þý lost and the modern city and the neighborhood has ýbecome. So that today the neighborhoods 374 of Tehran, due to replacing the general ýsocial organizations rather than neighborhoods, failure to use and utilizes the power of ýpartnerships, and community residents to manage community, great migration, fatigue and ýlack of municipal buildings and mismatch them with new details regarding the identities ýand locations of human communities, neighborhood associations and relationships within ýtheir neighborhood is lost. So that today the neighborhoods 374of Tehran, due to replacing ýthe general social organizations rather than neighborhoods, failure to use and utilizes the ýpower of partnerships, and community residents to manage community, great migration, ýfatigue and lack of municipal buildings and mismatch them with new details regarding the ýidentities and locations of human communities, neighborhood associations and ýrelationships within their neighborhood is lost. Since the return of the old neighborhoods ýof Tehran is not feasible and reasonable. So keeping in mind the need to retrieve the ýidentity, values and meaning of the neighborhood - Iran and the role and function of the ýurban neighborhoods in Tehran could have, should lead to serious consideration of ýsustainable development places in the city. Accordingly, in this research, identify ýindicators of sustainable community development and Sustainable Development and ýevaluation of a neighborhood in the slums of Tehran and test hypotheses as 1- The study ýsites are located at different levels of development. 2- The social base - the residents of ýthe neighborhoods studied economics and sustainable development of the communities ýthere is discussed. ý
MethodologyThe aim of the present study was applied and methods descriptive - analytical. In this ýresearch, according with regard to a problem and aim of the study, the unit of analysis was ýselected households in the neighborhood. Then sample size was calculated using ýCochran's sample of 384 families, from families living in the city of Tehran was ýdetermined. Then classify the neighborhoods of Tehran in social - economic 4 class (High, ýmedium high, medium, low, low), a neighborhood of each category were selected using ýrandom sampling. Accordingly, the share of total population in each neighborhood to ýneighborhood site each sample was determined by sample size. Then required data were ýcollected from the families sampled in a systematic way. Then, using the Kruskal-Wallis ýtest is a test of the difference, the initial data matrix was prepared, then with Using ýAnalytical Hierarchy Process and Vikor Method Neighborhood sustainability, the study ýsites were assessed. Finally using the One-way analysis of variance and Pearson Statistical ýtests Hypotheses were examined. ý
Results and discussionThe results of the analytic hierarchy process for sustainable community development ýindices showed that Weighted index of social justice (0. 236), Safety and Security weighted ýindex (0. 208), Environmental indicators weight (0. 179), Identity and vitality index ýweight (0. 114), weighted index of the urban landscape (0. 102), Weighted satisfaction ýindex (0. 097) and Participation index weight (0. 064), The index of social justice and ýparticipation, Respectively the highest and lowest value, sustainable development ýindicators are compared to other neighborhoods. ý
The results of the Vikor model Showed that Niloufar neighborhoods with Q=0. 017 and ýneighborhood Valiasr shomali with Q=1. 000, respectively the best and worst of ýneighborhood sustainability indicators are and Ashtiani's and Imamiye neighborhoods with ýstability 0. 160 and 0. 613 ranked second and third in the neighborhood are sustainability. ý
ConclusionThe overall results of the study suggest different levels of sustainability in the ýcommunities studied, and the reason may be lack of municipal subdivisions in the ýneighborhood and ends with the establishment of the municipality in the area, clutter ýneighborhoods studied historical identity in the process of urban development and et al ýnoted. ý
To increase the level of success in achieving sustainable development, neighborhood ýlocalities studied following suggestions are offered. ý
Principal or district administrators and trustees elected from among the residents of the ýneighborhood; ý
Open green spaces and open and moderation in the housing of the prospect, air, noise and ýlight; ý
Spatial andþ þsocial structure of right and moderation in the economic and social groups; ý
According to the Environmental Planning andþ þpreserve environmental values in the ýneighborhood and the reduction of noise and air pollution expand the scope of public ýhealth and the environment; ý Increase social security in addition to the neighborhood police station by a guard and ýencourage a sense of community responsibility and local people, especially for women ýand children. ý