Semiotic Analysis of genuine and un genuine crystallization in literary discourse: the case study of Persian folk tale entitled Sezaye - niki badist

The present research focuses on the question of genuine and un genuine in literary discourse by adopting the semiotic approach which regards discourse as process-oriented phenomenon in order to create semantic structures and investigate their effects on the interactive regime of actants based on Heidegger, Austin, Baudouin, Greimas and Tarasti thoughts in the field of semiotics and discourse analysis. At this point, to explain the language correlation with genuine and un genuine, our focus of attention as the corpus will be so–called Persian folk tale “Sezaye Niki Badist” by concentrating on this question that how folk narrative can replace the process of detecting genuine and un genuine by changing the signification production process. By genuine, we mean an utterance or statement which is linguistically and semiotically speaking the best choice according to the context and situation of discourse production and speaker's ontological point of view, while, un genuine refers to every property which disturbs or damages the natural process of signification production. The goal of the current research is to detect the conditions of realization of these opposite factors in language, according to selected corpus of Persian literary folk narrative to understand the manner of formation and their resulted changes in discourse. The main question in the current article is that what kind of factors intervene in the formation of these elements in the language and how these factors strength the discursive system, change and in some cases disarrange the realization of the signification and the reliability of the process.