An Analysis of the Role of Assent in Commitment Bequest
Abstract:
One of the challenges of civil jurisprudence is the nature of executorship of the will (commitment bequest = waṣiyyat ahdiyya) and the issue of assent (qabūl) in it. The renowned majority of Imāmī jurists believe that assent is not a precondition in commitment bequest. Article 834 of civil law has also approved this view. Although in agreement with the renowned majority of Imāmī jurists, this article contradicts a number of indisputable legal and judicial rules such as the principle of sovereignty and free will, necessity of assent in contracts, denial of loss, and distress and constriction. On the other hand, it is also impossible to ignore the bequeathers (muwassī) offer (ījāb) since the bequest would be left undecided and bring loss to him/her.
Besides the generally accepted view, there are other views in this issue, including that after the death of the bequeather, if the executor
(wasyy) has not accepted the execution of the will, he is entitled to reject or when the son is the executor of the father or if the execution of the will (wiṣāya) is not possible by anyone else except the executor himself, he should accept the execution of the will.
After refutation and confirmation of the viewpoints, this writing would accept Allāma Ḥillīs view with a slight difference as follows: the bequeather is legally and lawfully obliged to inform the executor of his object of bequest and to secure his assent before his (the bequeathers) death; in this case, no injustice is done neither to the bequeather nor the executor and the contradiction of the two principles of no harm would be eliminated.
Besides the generally accepted view, there are other views in this issue, including that after the death of the bequeather, if the executor
(wasyy) has not accepted the execution of the will, he is entitled to reject or when the son is the executor of the father or if the execution of the will (wiṣāya) is not possible by anyone else except the executor himself, he should accept the execution of the will.
After refutation and confirmation of the viewpoints, this writing would accept Allāma Ḥillīs view with a slight difference as follows: the bequeather is legally and lawfully obliged to inform the executor of his object of bequest and to secure his assent before his (the bequeathers) death; in this case, no injustice is done neither to the bequeather nor the executor and the contradiction of the two principles of no harm would be eliminated.
Keywords:
Language:
Persian
Published:
Islamic Jurisprudence & Its Principles, Volume:49 Issue: 109, 2017
Pages:
69 to 88
magiran.com/p1749916
دانلود و مطالعه متن این مقاله با یکی از روشهای زیر امکان پذیر است:
اشتراک شخصی
با عضویت و پرداخت آنلاین حق اشتراک یکساله به مبلغ 1,390,000ريال میتوانید 70 عنوان مطلب دانلود کنید!
اشتراک سازمانی
به کتابخانه دانشگاه یا محل کار خود پیشنهاد کنید تا اشتراک سازمانی این پایگاه را برای دسترسی نامحدود همه کاربران به متن مطالب تهیه نمایند!
توجه!
- حق عضویت دریافتی صرف حمایت از نشریات عضو و نگهداری، تکمیل و توسعه مگیران میشود.
- پرداخت حق اشتراک و دانلود مقالات اجازه بازنشر آن در سایر رسانههای چاپی و دیجیتال را به کاربر نمیدهد.
دسترسی سراسری کاربران دانشگاه پیام نور!
اعضای هیئت علمی و دانشجویان دانشگاه پیام نور در سراسر کشور، در صورت ثبت نام با ایمیل دانشگاهی، تا پایان فروردین ماه 1403 به مقالات سایت دسترسی خواهند داشت!
In order to view content subscription is required
Personal subscription
Subscribe magiran.com for 70 € euros via PayPal and download 70 articles during a year.
Organization subscription
Please contact us to subscribe your university or library for unlimited access!