The time of adducing evidence in civil suits

The matter of the time the evidence must be adduced by the claimant has been a source of controversy among jurists from a long time ago. The question is that is it posible to adduce the evidence during the procedure or all of evidences most be adduced at the beggining of the claim and annexed to the bill. Some strongly believe
that the litigants are not obligated to follow paragraph 6 of article 51 of civil procedure act and can present their evidences based on benefits and necessities and they use the court’s obligation to administer justice and the correspondence principle as their evidences and so they eventually consider freedom in adducing evidence acceptable. Another group also holds the belief that the evidences must be presented by the defendant on behalf of the plaintiff during the complaint in the first defense session and “not prolonging the proceeding” and “maintaining order” can be pointed out as the excuses they have to believe so. We have made an effort to empower the second idea which means the necessity to adduce evidence during the plaint with regard to the articles of the law which are related to the discussion and writings of the jurists.