Grammatical and Vocabulary Archaism in Parvin Etesami's Five Minimal Stories

Archaism is one of highlighting and personazing methods of language. This method is one of unfamiliarity of ancient elements (archaic) of language. The use of historical language elements in texture of time after it is called archaism. Language units (such as morpheus, words, phrases, grammatical structures) have time seal on themselves, which means historical nature and language historicity. If we seperate past language elements from historical situations and transfer them to subsequent periods of language texture, then the speech time’s norm is broken and the speech takes distance from the historical texture which is born. Deep link of Parvin’s poem with Persian language and literature is clear and obvious in her various and perfect poetry. By passing centuries, Persian language has deserved her strength and authenticity dynamically. That shows richness of Persian language in vocabulary and content. Among contemporary poets, Parvin had tendency to classic poetry and she chose and used archaism as a place for making eloquence of language. Vocabulary and grammatical archaism in Parvin’s poetry has special position. In this research, I study four minimal stories of this famous poet based on the effect of ancient grammar and vocabulary in her poems that how much Parvin’s poetry was affected by which one of archaism types.