Place Differences in Productivity and Exploitation Rate in Rural Economy in Buin and Miandasht County (Isfahan Province)

The development of new ways to extract and use resources is one of the factors in the transformation of the earth. In spite of the large reserves of resources, the ability to utilize these resources is essential. On the other hand, numerous economic, political and social problems limit the availability of available resources to many societies. The availability of materials is not only a function of
resources, but also if the earth was homogeneous (the distribution of materials was the same), apart from the two solid ice and stone, there are no other sources (to the great extent) we currently use, The materials needed for health, well-being and survival of the community are dependent on the land resources, the productivity of the amount of the product obtained from the unit of production resources, namely labor, capital and land. Productivity refers to the degree of efficiency of an agent or a set of factors of production in the production of a product or a set of products. Today, the issue
of increasing productivity is a serious concern in most countries, one of the most important economic features in rural areas of Iran, The low productivity of production factors. A look at poverty statistics in developing countries shows that although poverty is seen in both urban and rural communities, most poor people live in rural areas, and the severity of poverty in rural areas is often higher, therefore, the study of the spatial difference between the rate of utilization and productivity in the rural economy is inevitable.
Methodlogy and material: The method of this research is descriptive-analytical, which has been written with sustainable rural development approach. The statistical population of the study consisted of farmers living in the villages of Buin and Miandasht. In order to collect data accurately and easily, the sample size of the research was selected from five villages in 46 villages of the city. Five sample village villages have been selected with characteristics such as proper dispersal at the village level, a suitable population, selection of different types of rural and one sample from each village. The samples were moderated by the Cochran formula, making up 110 questionnaires. The research indicators were derived from social, economic and environmental dimensions, which totally include 30 indicators. Data analysis method is performed using ELECTRE technique.
6
Geography and Development, 16nd Year, No.50, Spring 2018

Based on this, five sample villages in three villages have the least (more desirable) difference "in different indices, not one indicator", and two other sample villages in this study have a greater (less desirable) difference, but the results are fixed definitely The weaknesses of these villages are not in all indices. If a research in this area and sample villages of this study was carried out as Rural Water Resources Valuation in autumn of 2015 by Wicker ranking method, which indicates the less capacity of Dashkasan and Masum Abad villages in the index Other (water resources capability), so there is no rating, but in terms of privileges The analysis can be done with the differences in villages with varying degrees of varying degrees. The phenomena in the city as a whole, based on the findings of the active organizations in the city and the views of the authorities, are summarized in four groups of factors Less attention has been paid to this, existing capacities in the environment, progress barriers and some of the available resources in the geographical area of the city are divided. In analytical studies, the differences in productivity and utilization of crops It can be stated that the amount, area and quality of agricultural land, the amount of water resources suitable for the environment, and the
use of suitable and compatible equipment for cultivation are three key factors in the efficiency of production.

According to the results of the study, there is a significant difference in the rate of utilization and productivity among the villages. These differences, due to the natural and social conditions of each village, have different degrees in which the scattering of rural areas in the city is one of the factors of
this difference. On the other hand, border divisions have been effective in obtaining financial and natural resources and creating a spatial difference, and creating social and human factors creates a different way. Therefore, the proper pattern of the exploiters is the maximum productivity of agricultural production, avoiding waste of resources, which is not available due to the environmental capabilities of the area and considering the natural and human resources available with proper planning to improve the overall level of the area. It should be noted that the major contribution of spatial differences among the villages of Buin and Miandasht is due to environmental factors, which change is not practically possible, but by changing the attitude and proper setting in the use or
utilization of efficient equipment and on-going spatial differences to the minimum It has been achieved and will increase productivity.