Hartle-Hawking Wave Function Law and the Creation of Literally Nothing

Quentin Smith in his papers has claimed that believing in Hartle-Hawking wave function law as a kind of quantum cosmological model imply the denying of traditional theism, because they are in contradiction. There are many criticisms to his argument, but I criticize the argument by appealing to the concept of laws of nature.
The method of the present research is a logical and rational analysis with scientific achievements.
There are four main viewpoints about what is to be a law of nature, i.e. regularity theory viewpoint; universal theory viewpoint; antirealist viewpoint; and antireductionist viewpoint.
The author of the present paper introduces some important advocators of each viewpoint and concludes that the Smith interpretation of Hartle-Hawking wave function law is inconsistence with them.