Terror and contemplation; from habermas and Chomsky to Derrida (A formal and content critique of the book terror and contemplation')

In this article we have dealt with a critique and on the relationship between terror and contemplation based on the Eagleton, Derrida, Chamsky' viewpoints in the book" terror and contemplation". Since the present book is pivoted around different and sometimes opposite viewpoints about a controversial idea in political science( terror and contemplation), the reader is introduced with a theoretical challenge about a single phenomenon ( such as September 11th event); therefore, a complicated mentality is provided for readers to reflect more on the twisted societal phenomena. In a general criticism, all of the above_mentioned viewpoints about a historiograghy of a terrorist event ( each one from a specific perspective) have their own defects, and this has been acting as a block against making a comparison between terror and contemplation and consequently, having an understanding of a phenomenon with different dimensions that in the critiques that has been made we have tried to deal with them.