Effective Ways to Enforce Civil Sentences in Iran and France

When a court issues a civil judgment, but the convicted does not execute it voluntarily, if there are no effective remedies available to winning party to bind a losing party over the execution of a sentence, the court's decision becomes in practice a worthless piece of paper, hence, effective strategies to enforce the laws and provide justice are essential. Therefore, in addition to paying attention to specific sanctions, these strategies should benefit from effective science, including economics and communications, and be accompanied by successful experiences.
Undoubtedly, current solutions to the enforcement of civil sentences in Iran's law do not have the capacity to create executive power and prevent the convicted person from escaping from execution to satisfy the judgment. Therefore, it is necessary to make the necessary changes, including constituting a legal system for the identification of the convicted property. In France, with the establishment of this system, the civil code has found its judicial value due to the possibility of quick execution of the judgment out of the convicted person' properties and the prevention of the hiding of property by him. Thus, in this article, we have tried to study the effective strategies of the execution of civil judgments in both legal systems by a comparative study of French and Iranian law.