A contemplation on punishing recidivism of filicide based on Imamate jurisprudence's capacities

For proving the retaliation, the Muslim jurisprudents` agreement on stipulation of termination of paternity is indisputable. Nevertheless, there are differences as to the problems related to that stipulation. One of the important issues which has been rarely considered among them, is recidivism of filicide or addiction to it. According to the philosophy of legislating retaliation or similar cases in jurisprudences such as realizing addiction to murder a man slave, it is possible to conclude that a father may be retaliated in the assumption of recidivism of filicide or addiction to it. Similarly, the evidence of necessity of murdering some ones who have perpetrated the mortal sins more than three times or also evidence of corrupting on the earth can be referred in this concern. In this paper, based on the absoluteness and generality of evidence connecting the exemption of a father from retaliation (however he may be killed in some above cases), it was shown that all these forms are not enough for proving retribution of a father, and if they have proved it in some cases, it is not for as a retaliation but for an another criminal title.