Pathology of "a religious epistemic" in the era of Ibn Rushd and Sadr al-Din Shirazi

The present article reviews the status of "a religious epistemic" era of two Muslim philosophers Ibn Rushd (520-595 AH) and Mulla Sadra (979-1045) is based on two works, "al-maqāl season ..." Ibn Rushd and "The project has three principal "is Mulla Sadra.The aim of this study is to review each of these two philosophers pathological position adopted in the face of the Islamic society of his era recording processes have knowledge of such an account, the thinking part of the time.This research is descriptive - analytic.
In this article, we briefly discussed the socio-political situation era two philosophers, then examined the position of each of these two men in two books about the study, compared to the existing currents in contemporary religious thought.
And then, to compare the similarities and differences of thought and action in the field at the end of two philosophers to the conclusion that both thinkers, with different criteria intended to identify the "obstacles to the attainment of a religious epistemic" are. Through adoption of religious sciences such as jurisprudence, in a religious epistemic, Ibn Rushd damage from lack of rational methods of deduction is legitimate, and the adoption of the Hereafter in a religious epistemic, these terms of Mulla Sadra, lack of attention to "self-knowledge" and of the Apocalypse.