Critique of government policy making in Iran Based on Snellen analytical model of the Case study on theJusticeSharesDistribution Plan

policymaking in Iran is done, because of the rupture of two-stage collection and execution, often different from what was promised, Academic communities due to the inevitable specialization gave analyses and different strategies and sometimes competing with their own perspective to policy-markers which does not have the capacity to repair the rupture . Therefore, the researchers by using multi-pattern analysis '' combined rationality'' Snellen made it possible to criticize government comprehensive policies in the scientific community, and subsequently provide consistent feedbacks having the strategic and repairing capacity to put on theire agendum(program).. Studying the case of the "Equity Distribution Shares Plan" in the form of Snellen's combined rationality, which includes four types of rationality (economic, political, legal, and professional), researchers are trying to resolve the foregoing paths of policy. The data collection method is a non-structured interview and data analysis method is analytical -structural. The statistical population of the study consisted of twenty interviewees who have been selected judiciously. Each field of rationality has been covered by five related experts. The findings show that the plan for the distribution of equity has been operationalized for reasons such as not paying attention to the requirements of practical and economic rationality and overlooking the requirements of different political rationality than promised. The proposed strategies also include legal, political, economic, and administrative areas.