Evaluation of Alphabetic Forms of " انما انما کل و این ما" and its Reflection in Persian Translations

One of the problematic issues in the translation and interpretation of Quran is paying attention to the particular alphabetic form of some words which are written in two different ways, causing different semantic interpretations exist. In line with this, the current article have analyzed duality of the alphabetic form of ÇäãÇ ÇäãÇ á ãÇ æ Çیä ãÇ based on the grammar of Arabic language and literature via a descriptive-analytic method, then through finding equivalence, has evaluated Persian translations of Quran. Finally it is concluded that some translators have paid attention to the differences between such alphabetic forms. They have chosen wrong equivalences while translating. However, by choosing appropriate meaning, the translators have understood such distinctions. Although the major problem of the translations refers to lack of attention to the original alphabetic form of the words, the basic problem refers to the translators weakness in recognizing morphological and syntactic structures of the source language which itself leads to choosing inappropriate equivalence in the target language. However, Rezaeis translation is the best among all.