A Study of a Assurance for Moral Orders in Two Realistic and Anti-Realistic Approaches in Ethics

Given choosing an unrealistic ethical approach, moral, logical and practical safeguards can not be provided for the realization of ethical values, since if moral judgments taken as being based on human emotions, collective agreements or pure formal convention, they will not be real and may not be explained rationally and evoke the agent to act ethically; even though government laws could force the people of the community to comply with ethical rulings. In this case, what is observed is a legal law, not a moral one, and, therefore, will not have moral value. But if realism is accepted, various motivations for the realization of moral action can be presented, the highest of which is based on the divine absolute perfection. The action taken with this motive, while being the most valuable moral act, will have the most effective rational, real, and executive support. The paper has explained the various dimensions of the above issue.