The Place and Importance of Judicial Procedure in the Judiciary's Administrative Justice

In this research, the role and place of judicial proceedings in the judiciary's appeals has been examined. To apply the rules that are applicable to the determination of claims in the Supreme Court, one should rely on judicial procedure, since in contrast to the conflicting implications of the law, the doctrine's opinions differ in the provision of the rules; the judicial procedure of the Court, especially in some cases Which has led to the unanimity of the procedure; it is imperative; however, this procedure is ideally inferior to the jurisdiction of the Tribunal. The judicial system in identifying the applicable lawsuits, between the competence of the branches and the general board deliberately Has been made. If it was better to differentiate between the general jurisdiction of the Court and the Court, according to the general jurisdiction of the Court, and the coordinates of each dispute in relation to the ability to file a claim. By examining the unanimity of the Supreme Court and the Administrative Court and the possibility of confrontation between them, it became evident that in the event of a vote of opposition to the unity of the administrative justice system by the decision of one of the branches of the Supreme Court in the matter of jurisdiction, given the fact that the Verdict of the Uniformity of the Court of Justice in the sentence The law is the ruling of the Administrative Court. However, in case of opposition between the Verdict of the Unity of the State Court of Justice and the Unity of Administrative Justice, for the following reasons, the Supreme Court's Supreme Court's Supreme Court's Supreme Court has to accept the Supreme Court's Supreme Court's unanimity vote on other unanimity votes.