Jurisprudential and legal analysis of tendering the seized vehicles by the security forces

For improving and progressing the statutes, and promoting the security of the property in the society and prohibiting an illegal possession, this paper examines the theories of legitimizing the tender of the seized vehicles by the security forces according to the intellectual arguments and jurisprudential and legal certainties. Similarly, in this regard, punishment of custody of something and the different legal dimensions of avoiding to return by the owner are examined. In this paper, the author restudies the rule of abandonment and the other causes of removing the ownership in the Islamic jurisprudence; and by analyzing the legislator`s intention in the very legislating the penalty of custody, and the theory of paying the fine for the road traffic offences, the author concludes that argumentation of the legal causes in order to remove the ownership and legitimacy of tendering is incomplete according to the legal and jurisprudential analysis. The author also believes that in some presumptions, the requirements of article 11 proceeding law of road traffic offences are contrary to the certain legal principles and jurisprudential rules; because, on one hand, these requirements make the legal effect of the article 6 of the mentioned law - being temporary of custody judgment - practically invalid, and prevent the owner to return to the vehicle, and on the other hand, they are contrary to the Islamic Shariat`s intensions based on the guaranty of social justice, and impact on the issue of ownership.