The Contradiction Between the Narrations Regarding Theft of the Properties in Herzwhich Sentenced to Had

Despite the disagreement regarding the issue of herz, all the jurists except IbnAbiAqil `Amani,believed that a Hadsentence would be issued for a thief when the stolen property has been taken from Herz-a place where usually people put their wealthy things in it. It is whilesome narrations indicate that being in herz for a stolen property is not required for Had, but the majority of these narrations can be come to an agreement with narration of herz. Those groups of narrations which contradict the narrations of herz would be ignored;due to the fame in narrations regarding the credibility of herz. At least, by considering many narrations which imply the credibility of herz in thefts sentenced to Had,and consequently uncertainty and doubt in the rule, and alsothe requirement of the Dar` rule (rejection of Had at the time of doubt and uncertainty), Had should be avoided when there is no evidence that proves the stolen property had been in herz.