CONCEPTS AND CHALLENGES OF CURBING CORRUPTION IN PUBLIC PROCUREMENT CONTRACTS FOCUSING ON STAKEHOLDER ACCOUNTABILITY

Developing countries devote huge shares of their annual budget to Public Procurement contracts, which are awarded through standard processes to avoid discrimination and obtain the best price/quality. Thus, national contracts are meticulously scrutinized to make sure that the public budget is properly allotted to the best spending. Public sector management, as the main actor of Public Procurement contracts, is held accountable, for thedecisionsmadeinthecontractsandtovariousgroups of stakeholders. Actual or perceived corruption is increasing in the third-world countries. Iran is unfortunately low in the published transparency records. Many stakeholders are involved in public procurement processeswithdierentexpectationsanddemands. Payingattentiontotheirdemandsandcreatingaccountabilityincontractshelpcurbtheperceivedoractualcorruption. Literature is reviewed in public procurement and stakeholderaccountability. Corporatesocialresponsibility draws attention of public rms to their stakeholders and becomes increasingly more responsible and accountable, particularly in their contracts. Stakeholders are categorized into salient, urgent and import. The public, internal workers and managers, suppliers, and even competitors are stakeholders. \Thematic analysis" and \in-depth interview", as qualitative research methods, are used to extract the main topicsandelementsofcorruptioninpublicprocurement. A case study is used to develop a base model and use coding for the main themes. Three main themes of corruption in Iran's Public Procurement system are: weakness in organization communication which impedes the normal ow of organizational \Culture" and \Knowledge"; dysfunctional imbalance between leadership and managerial feature sof the public procurement contracts; deterioration of public procurement value chain in rentier economy. Solutions are oered to curb corruption.