One of the most important events after the death of the Holy Prophet (PBUH) are the victories happened in wars during the rule of the early caliphs of Islam. Muslim scholars and thinkers have taken different approaches those victories. Some have likened them to Prophet's (PBUH) ghazvats, consider defending the foundation of Islam their main motive. On the other hand, some scholars have regarded those conquests as disasters. Therefore, the issue has raised a number of questions because of its importance. The present paper sought to answer this question: What was the position of Ahl al-Bait (AS) against the aforementioned conquests? To answer this question by examining the motives of the conquerors, as well as reviewing and evaluating the documents and evidence of the happiness of Ahlul-Bayt (as) because of the victories, such as the glad tidings made by Prophet (PBUH), consultation of the caliphs with Imam Ali (AS), some historians' belief in the participation of Hassan (AS) and Hussein (AS) in the conquests, the involvement of the companions of Imam Ali (AS) in the conquests and finally reviewing and evaluating the documents showing the disapproval of Ahlul-Bayt (AS) such as the narratives proving the illegitimacy of the conquests, and narratives that have expressed the legitimacy criterion of jihad (Imam's permission) from which it is possible to infer the illegitimacy of the conquests, we found that the approach by Ahlul-Bayt (AS) did not approve the conquests.
- حق عضویت دریافتی صرف حمایت از نشریات عضو و نگهداری، تکمیل و توسعه مگیران میشود.
- پرداخت حق اشتراک و دانلود مقالات اجازه بازنشر آن در سایر رسانههای چاپی و دیجیتال را به کاربر نمیدهد.