Comparative review of the performance of hybrid managers compared to Pure managers in the public sector from the perspective of professional and academic activists

The new public management is to enabling administrators for controlling and running affairs. For getting a management position, one of the important cases is manager specialty and the relation of expertise and organizational post. In some financial management and accounting position in organizations, there are some managers with non-accounting expertise that hybrid managers can be said to them. In contrast, in som cases, some managers with accounting and financial expertise with can be seen that pure managers are said to them. The aim of this research is to evaluate the comparative performance of hybrid managers compared to pure managers in the public sector from the perspective of professional and academic activists. This study is survey-functional. The study sample includes 15 groups of professional and academic activists that are studied by Delphi technique. This research tool is a questionnaire and to analyze the results after reviewing the normality of data by SPSS software version 22, in the form of two hypotheses, one sample t parametric test, and independent t was used. The results showed that with the viewpoints of all respondents, pure managers and controllers have more controlling and management quality. Also, this was confirmed by the viewpoints of the university instructors. In contrast, from the perspective of professional activists, hybrid managers and controllers have stronger control and management quality