The Right to Imprisonment in Iran's Legal System

The courts have long disagreed about the scope of the right to imprisonment for women, and the majority of the courts have argued that only a specific obedience to Muscat is the right to sue the wife; in fact, this opinion was based on the famous jurisprudent views on how to crash the right to imprisonment. But by virtue of the unanimity of the 718 Supreme Court, which extends the scope of the right of imprisonment to marriage in absolute terms, we must consider that it is only in the general favor of Muscat that the right to imprisonment in marriage is due to the use of the word The duties in the 1085 and 1086 are absolute duties of marriage and, given the wide range of cases of subjugation, it is very difficult to assume marriage without proper subjection. Therefore, given the necessity for the unanimity of the vote of unity, we must ensure that the disagreements between the courts are over, and the general obedience of Muscat is the right of the husband to be imprisoned; nevertheless, most of the courts still vote in accordance with the previous procedure, Muscat is entitled to imprisonment. This article attempts to first clarify the concepts related to the wife's right of imprisonment, and then examine the evidence of the validity of this right in marriage, and examine this issue whether this right is based on the principles and objectives of marriage And then we will examine the unanimity of the Supreme Court of the Islamic Republic of Iran and its interpretation. The correct interpretation of this ballot makes it clear that in fact the wife's right of imprisonment has been eliminated from the family legal system.