A critique of Qaisar Aminpour’s poetry structure

Literature is not coherent entirely, including verse and prose, but some of them are at supreme while others are at medium and weak rank. This matter has caused critical professors to criticize its validity and invalidity. Literary criticism is setting to values of literary works, its good and bad exposed to its readers’ view. Considering this remark, it can be understood that a literary work especially poetry is that a critic to evaluate its phrases and content by deep and exact attitude. In structural criticism, the components of a poem should not be investigated one-dimentionally, but it should be analyzed in phonetic, lexical and syntactic categories. In phonetic study, especial attention should be given to the structure of rhythm, rhyme, line, the tone of speech and the meaning of poem. Regarding the description, the study of poetry structure is not possible except that be performed in the light of immaginary images. The poetry of Kaiser Aminpour, suffered poet of post-revolution takes steps in the same vein. Properties of Aminpour’s poetry are love and praise, beautiful imagery, protest religion, being depressed, repeating and playing with words, utilizing allusions, escaping from lexical and syntactic norms, inadequacy of rhythm and tone, redundancy, cheap and loose poetry, childish literature, research on other poets, making use of slang lexicon, and utilization of poetic taxonomy including simile, metaphor, synonymy, paradox, hyperbole, symmetry, phonetic structure, new compounds, contradiction, allegory and so on.