Comparing and analysis moulanas view about the inherent of nature in mathnavi with Heraclitus ideas

Discussion about inner change of nature or dialectic is a theme that many of philosophers has took upon that at the course of the history of philosophy .this has been investigated from such these aspects as: relation of objects and phenomenon, movement and constantly change, negation of negative, evolution of the objects of the nature, unity of tow oppositions and… . Therefore, with focus on the course of the history of philosophy has been cleared that doctrine of consistence and change is from the more central discussions of the course. Although some of philosophers (like Parmenides) denies the Flux theory of nature, but Heraclitus is the pioneer of philosophers that can't think about nature unless they suppose movement of nature. Logos, Change, Opposition, and unity in plurality are foundations that he based his Flux theory on those. Mola'na' _ one of pioneers of mysticism in Islam- has think about change of nature, but metaphysically. For him nature has been changed because God wills that. God's will is why the nature changed and constantly phenomenon are concealed and unconcealed or die and revive. Now, along this article we try to analysis and compare the theories of tow thinkers and show that, differences of the thoughts of those are formal and ultimately will conclude the common points of thinkers about inner change of nature.