To analyze “well-being” and “bad-being” of geographical territories

To be or not to be, this isn’t the question, “How-being”, is the question. this is not unknown for people that what territories and the dwellers of territories do live in the world? but the [important] question is this: “how do those live?” why are many geographic territories thriving territories and enjoy of “well-being” and many territories suffer [of their being] and struggle with “bad-being”? the findings of causal-experiential method in this article shows: there are “well-being” in the territories that have “good governance”. “good governance” increases competitiveness power of a territory, this process, provides higher rank of ‘globalization’ index for that territory and in final, that (higher rank territory in ‘globalization’ index) presents “well-being” to dwellers of territories. The strong correlation among ‘good governance’, ‘competitiveness’, and ‘globalization’ with ‘thriving’ shows: there is the difference of “well-being” [index] in among territories because there is the difference of “good governance” [index], and in the following, [the difference in] ‘competitiveness’ and ‘globalization’ [index]; as power of ‘competitiveness’ and the rank of territories in the ‘globalization’ [index] has a strong correlation with ‘good governance’. In final, “good live”of dwellings of territories is dependent on being of ‘good governance’ [pattern] in there.