Historiography of Afzal -ul-Mulk; lived experience in both traditional and modern life world

The aim of this article is that Afzal -ul-Mulk method and attitude in the historiography was discussed with the respect to his lived experience. We want to lived experience the historian are reflected in another form in the sphere of historiography. The Center of this lived experience is the transitional period that puts him in a limbo. Since he living in the beginning of the change, domination of the new lived experience that constitution is a symbol of its, is not evident. And hence it can be said that Afzal -ul-Mulk is involved between the two traditional and modern life world and feedback of this problem is evident in its writing, So sometimes conflicting concepts using like " tyranny" and "constitutional" and "Peasant" and "nation" and in the various positions of writing tend to find to one of those two. He lived due to breathing in the modern life world that is associated with the formulation of "Public Sphere " , different writing creating than the historiography of his several decades ago. Therefore, the basic themes of his writing takes paradoxical nature by the transition period. And this paradox show off in some positions in the field of defense and thinking of the past and in some other positions on the field side of the new system and puts its readers in a dualism .