A comparatives study of Unfair comptetion in iranin law with shiit jurisprudence and the paris convention

prudence and the paris convention Competition has different titles, but fair competition in recruitment make the benefits of a all society. But in some instance, competitor use irrecoverable harm to their compet-ing commercial interests by using illegal and unprotected methods. In this case, it is a type of competition in which business competitors use equipment unfairly and compete for unfair titles. Unfortunately, there is no exact definition of the meaning of unfair competition, but in addition to unfair competition, which is discussed in private law, there is no definite way of defining public rights and economic rights, which they call competition law. In the law of instance such as offensive and discriminatory pricing, monopoly, similarity of name and trademark, as well as cases in the field of industrial property rights, we can mention the obstacles to fair competition, in other words, unfair competition. In Imamieh jurisprudence, with its rich resources, it is prohibited to disor-derly competition, among which, in addition to many verses and narratives, it is possible to mention cases such as hoarding, reckoning, and the rule of lawlessness. Given the above, it is clear that the law defends a fair competition and request to reform the com-petitive relationship between individuals, which, assuming this important, can be seen as a Justice-centered economy. In this study, to clarify the nature of Fair competition , con-cept and examples of unfair competition, and to better understand the unfair competition law, compare it with some of the relevant institutions in the Paris Convention and other conventions.