Ibn Sinas’ accounts of possibility and necessity argument and the Fallacy of composition

One of the well-known arguments for the existence of God is “the Argument from Necessity and Possibility”. It was Avicenna who first, in his works, formulated this argument. This argument has been criticized by Gazzali, Averroes, Molla Sadra, Hume, Kant, Russell and… in the world of Islam and in the west. One of critiques, that be accounted in the both Islamic world and west world, is that the whole of world has an independent and real being and this matter leads to the fallacy of composition. Mulla Sadra beliefs that Sikh Ishragh’s account of this argument has this problem. We can, by exactly, understand that accounts of Sikh Ishragh and Avicenna and also Mulla Sadra have this problem but have not the fallacy of composition. This article seeks to make clear, these objects extensively.